D. Schlehöfer , H. Kittel , A. Vráblík , M. Dragoun
{"title":"加氢裂化和催化裂化原料与废轮胎和废塑料热解油渣的相容性","authors":"D. Schlehöfer , H. Kittel , A. Vráblík , M. Dragoun","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In contrast to residual fractions of petroleum hydrocarbons, pyrolysis oil residues (boiling above 360 °C) from chemical waste represent an underexplored feedstock. The primary issue that will need to be addressed in their coprocessing in oil refineries by cracking technologies will be compatibility with petroleum hydrocarbons. From a variety of recommended methods, a combination of SARA group analysis, standard and digitized spot test, and optical microscopy were used to evaluate the homogeneity and compatibility of standard feed for hydrocracking and FCC with scrap tires and waste plastics pyrolysis oil distillation residue in the concentration range of 0–100 wt%. A total of 40 samples were evaluated. It has been shown that the behavior of these blends is difficult to predict, as it is highly dependent on the particular blend and the concentration of the components contained. Notably, the most significant compatibility issues were observed at low concentrations of one feed in the other—a critical insight for the coprocessing of pyrolysis oil residues. Overall, blending hydrocracking feed with waste plastics pyrolysis oil residue, and FCC feed with scrap tires pyrolysis oil residue, showed the most favorable compatibility profiles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 102283"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compatibility of feed for hydrocracking and FCC with scrap tires and waste plastics pyrolysis oil residue\",\"authors\":\"D. Schlehöfer , H. Kittel , A. Vráblík , M. Dragoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In contrast to residual fractions of petroleum hydrocarbons, pyrolysis oil residues (boiling above 360 °C) from chemical waste represent an underexplored feedstock. The primary issue that will need to be addressed in their coprocessing in oil refineries by cracking technologies will be compatibility with petroleum hydrocarbons. From a variety of recommended methods, a combination of SARA group analysis, standard and digitized spot test, and optical microscopy were used to evaluate the homogeneity and compatibility of standard feed for hydrocracking and FCC with scrap tires and waste plastics pyrolysis oil distillation residue in the concentration range of 0–100 wt%. A total of 40 samples were evaluated. It has been shown that the behavior of these blends is difficult to predict, as it is highly dependent on the particular blend and the concentration of the components contained. Notably, the most significant compatibility issues were observed at low concentrations of one feed in the other—a critical insight for the coprocessing of pyrolysis oil residues. Overall, blending hydrocracking feed with waste plastics pyrolysis oil residue, and FCC feed with scrap tires pyrolysis oil residue, showed the most favorable compatibility profiles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Energy Institute\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Energy Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125003113\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125003113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Compatibility of feed for hydrocracking and FCC with scrap tires and waste plastics pyrolysis oil residue
In contrast to residual fractions of petroleum hydrocarbons, pyrolysis oil residues (boiling above 360 °C) from chemical waste represent an underexplored feedstock. The primary issue that will need to be addressed in their coprocessing in oil refineries by cracking technologies will be compatibility with petroleum hydrocarbons. From a variety of recommended methods, a combination of SARA group analysis, standard and digitized spot test, and optical microscopy were used to evaluate the homogeneity and compatibility of standard feed for hydrocracking and FCC with scrap tires and waste plastics pyrolysis oil distillation residue in the concentration range of 0–100 wt%. A total of 40 samples were evaluated. It has been shown that the behavior of these blends is difficult to predict, as it is highly dependent on the particular blend and the concentration of the components contained. Notably, the most significant compatibility issues were observed at low concentrations of one feed in the other—a critical insight for the coprocessing of pyrolysis oil residues. Overall, blending hydrocracking feed with waste plastics pyrolysis oil residue, and FCC feed with scrap tires pyrolysis oil residue, showed the most favorable compatibility profiles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include:
Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies
Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards;
Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS;
Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport
Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling
Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems
Energy storage
The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.