商业空间事故的独立安全调查:有关国际法及其影响研究

IF 1.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Chao-Ting Cheng
{"title":"商业空间事故的独立安全调查:有关国际法及其影响研究","authors":"Chao-Ting Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite recent developments advocating for independent safety investigations into commercial space accidents amid the rapid expansion of global space activities, no unified international framework currently exists, unlike the comprehensive system established for aviation accidents under ICAO’s Annex 13. While the independent safety investigation model found in international aviation law and maritime law provide instructive frameworks, the fundamental differences in the legal regimes governing space, air, and maritime domains constrain their direct applicability to space-related incidents. Existing space treaties, notably the Outer Space Treaty, the Liability Convention, and the Rescue Agreement, delineate state responsibilities and liabilities but do not establish detailed mechanisms for post-accident investigation. Furthermore, the development of an international investigative framework for space accidents is impeded by significant challenges, including national security considerations, export control regimes, and broader geopolitical dynamics. Nevertheless, this paper underscores the critical importance of international cooperation and transparency in advancing space safety. It concludes by calling for further scholarly inquiry and multilateral engagement, highlighting recent efforts by the United States and its allies to address export control limitations through bilateral agreements as a pragmatic step toward reconciling safety imperatives with national security concerns in the governance of commercial space activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 487-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent safety investigation for commercial space accidents: a research on relevant international laws and their implications\",\"authors\":\"Chao-Ting Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsse.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite recent developments advocating for independent safety investigations into commercial space accidents amid the rapid expansion of global space activities, no unified international framework currently exists, unlike the comprehensive system established for aviation accidents under ICAO’s Annex 13. While the independent safety investigation model found in international aviation law and maritime law provide instructive frameworks, the fundamental differences in the legal regimes governing space, air, and maritime domains constrain their direct applicability to space-related incidents. Existing space treaties, notably the Outer Space Treaty, the Liability Convention, and the Rescue Agreement, delineate state responsibilities and liabilities but do not establish detailed mechanisms for post-accident investigation. Furthermore, the development of an international investigative framework for space accidents is impeded by significant challenges, including national security considerations, export control regimes, and broader geopolitical dynamics. Nevertheless, this paper underscores the critical importance of international cooperation and transparency in advancing space safety. It concludes by calling for further scholarly inquiry and multilateral engagement, highlighting recent efforts by the United States and its allies to address export control limitations through bilateral agreements as a pragmatic step toward reconciling safety imperatives with national security concerns in the governance of commercial space activities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Space Safety Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 487-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Space Safety Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896725000825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896725000825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在全球空间活动迅速扩大的背景下,最近出现了主张对商业空间事故进行独立安全调查的事态发展,但与根据国际民航组织附件13为航空事故建立的全面制度不同,目前没有统一的国际框架。虽然国际航空法和海商法中的独立安全调查模式提供了指导性框架,但空间、空中和海洋领域法律制度的根本差异限制了它们直接适用于与空间有关的事件。现有的空间条约,特别是《外层空间条约》、《责任公约》和《救援协定》,规定了国家的责任和义务,但没有建立事故后调查的详细机制。此外,空间事故国际调查框架的发展受到重大挑战的阻碍,这些挑战包括国家安全考虑、出口管制制度和更广泛的地缘政治动态。尽管如此,该文件强调了国际合作和透明度在推进空间安全方面的至关重要性。报告最后呼吁进一步的学术研究和多边参与,强调了美国及其盟国最近通过双边协议解决出口管制限制的努力,作为在商业空间活动治理中协调安全要求与国家安全关切的务实步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent safety investigation for commercial space accidents: a research on relevant international laws and their implications
Despite recent developments advocating for independent safety investigations into commercial space accidents amid the rapid expansion of global space activities, no unified international framework currently exists, unlike the comprehensive system established for aviation accidents under ICAO’s Annex 13. While the independent safety investigation model found in international aviation law and maritime law provide instructive frameworks, the fundamental differences in the legal regimes governing space, air, and maritime domains constrain their direct applicability to space-related incidents. Existing space treaties, notably the Outer Space Treaty, the Liability Convention, and the Rescue Agreement, delineate state responsibilities and liabilities but do not establish detailed mechanisms for post-accident investigation. Furthermore, the development of an international investigative framework for space accidents is impeded by significant challenges, including national security considerations, export control regimes, and broader geopolitical dynamics. Nevertheless, this paper underscores the critical importance of international cooperation and transparency in advancing space safety. It concludes by calling for further scholarly inquiry and multilateral engagement, highlighting recent efforts by the United States and its allies to address export control limitations through bilateral agreements as a pragmatic step toward reconciling safety imperatives with national security concerns in the governance of commercial space activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Space Safety Engineering
Journal of Space Safety Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信