Amal Saleh Mohammed Al hothaufi , Yike Hu , Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi , Nour El Houda Ben Ameur , Ghada A. Alssadah , Haitham A. Ashah
{"title":"将未充分利用的城市空间转化为绿色基础设施:系统回顾","authors":"Amal Saleh Mohammed Al hothaufi , Yike Hu , Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi , Nour El Houda Ben Ameur , Ghada A. Alssadah , Haitham A. Ashah","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization in cities of the Global South has exacerbated environmental degradation and escalated pressure on land resources, leading to intricate challenges regarding sustainability, liveability, and equity. Repurposing underutilized land into multifunctional green infrastructure (GI) is urgent. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025, following the PRISMA protocol, to evaluate planning frameworks and methodological approaches for such transformations. The reviewed literature, covering case studies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, primarily focuses on brownfields, vacant lots, and underused public spaces. Analysis reveals four thematic clusters: (1) spatial analysis and site identification, (2) participatory and community-led planning, (3) governance and policy mechanisms, and (4) multifunctionality in GI strategies. Key gaps include the absence of a unified definition of “underutilized” spaces, reliance on static spatial datasets that overlook informal land use and changing vacancy patterns, and limited integration of justice dimensions specifically social, spatial, and procedural justice into GI planning. To address these gaps, the review recommends: (a) creating standardized classification systems that incorporate land tenure, contamination status, and historical use to counter definitional inconsistencies; (b) using hybrid geospatial data that integrate the temporal, spectral, and morphological dimensions data to overcome limitations of static datasets; and (c) prioritizing GI interventions in marginalized and high-risk communities to embed justice considerations. Finally, to overcome weak governance frameworks, inclusive models should be institutionalized to support co-design, prevent displacement, and strengthen resilience. These recommendations underscore the need for justice-oriented, context-specific GI strategies that reflect the socio-spatial and ecological complexities of Global South cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 106816"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming underutilized urban spaces into green infrastructure in Global South cities: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Amal Saleh Mohammed Al hothaufi , Yike Hu , Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi , Nour El Houda Ben Ameur , Ghada A. Alssadah , Haitham A. Ashah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rapid urbanization in cities of the Global South has exacerbated environmental degradation and escalated pressure on land resources, leading to intricate challenges regarding sustainability, liveability, and equity. Repurposing underutilized land into multifunctional green infrastructure (GI) is urgent. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025, following the PRISMA protocol, to evaluate planning frameworks and methodological approaches for such transformations. The reviewed literature, covering case studies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, primarily focuses on brownfields, vacant lots, and underused public spaces. Analysis reveals four thematic clusters: (1) spatial analysis and site identification, (2) participatory and community-led planning, (3) governance and policy mechanisms, and (4) multifunctionality in GI strategies. Key gaps include the absence of a unified definition of “underutilized” spaces, reliance on static spatial datasets that overlook informal land use and changing vacancy patterns, and limited integration of justice dimensions specifically social, spatial, and procedural justice into GI planning. To address these gaps, the review recommends: (a) creating standardized classification systems that incorporate land tenure, contamination status, and historical use to counter definitional inconsistencies; (b) using hybrid geospatial data that integrate the temporal, spectral, and morphological dimensions data to overcome limitations of static datasets; and (c) prioritizing GI interventions in marginalized and high-risk communities to embed justice considerations. Finally, to overcome weak governance frameworks, inclusive models should be institutionalized to support co-design, prevent displacement, and strengthen resilience. These recommendations underscore the need for justice-oriented, context-specific GI strategies that reflect the socio-spatial and ecological complexities of Global South cities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006894\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transforming underutilized urban spaces into green infrastructure in Global South cities: A systematic review
Rapid urbanization in cities of the Global South has exacerbated environmental degradation and escalated pressure on land resources, leading to intricate challenges regarding sustainability, liveability, and equity. Repurposing underutilized land into multifunctional green infrastructure (GI) is urgent. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025, following the PRISMA protocol, to evaluate planning frameworks and methodological approaches for such transformations. The reviewed literature, covering case studies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, primarily focuses on brownfields, vacant lots, and underused public spaces. Analysis reveals four thematic clusters: (1) spatial analysis and site identification, (2) participatory and community-led planning, (3) governance and policy mechanisms, and (4) multifunctionality in GI strategies. Key gaps include the absence of a unified definition of “underutilized” spaces, reliance on static spatial datasets that overlook informal land use and changing vacancy patterns, and limited integration of justice dimensions specifically social, spatial, and procedural justice into GI planning. To address these gaps, the review recommends: (a) creating standardized classification systems that incorporate land tenure, contamination status, and historical use to counter definitional inconsistencies; (b) using hybrid geospatial data that integrate the temporal, spectral, and morphological dimensions data to overcome limitations of static datasets; and (c) prioritizing GI interventions in marginalized and high-risk communities to embed justice considerations. Finally, to overcome weak governance frameworks, inclusive models should be institutionalized to support co-design, prevent displacement, and strengthen resilience. These recommendations underscore the need for justice-oriented, context-specific GI strategies that reflect the socio-spatial and ecological complexities of Global South cities.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including:
1. Smart cities and resilient environments;
2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management;
3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management);
4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities;
5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments;
6. Green infrastructure and BMPs;
7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management;
8. Urban agriculture and forestry;
9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure;
10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy;
11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities;
12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities;
13. Health monitoring and improvement;
14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies;
15. Smart city governance;
16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society;
17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies;
18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems.
19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management;
20. Waste reduction and recycling;
21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling;
22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;