{"title":"理解非基本行为冲击对贸易效率的不对称影响:来自中国贸易伙伴的证据","authors":"Chien-Chiang Lee , Farzan Yahya","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent global events and trade tensions have significantly impacted international trade dynamics, yet the role of non-fundamental behavioral shocks in shaping trade relationships remains understudied, particularly for major trading nations like China. This study investigates the impact of policy uncertainty and inflation expectations on China's trade efficiency. Using smoothed instrumental variable quantile regression (SIVQR) on a panel dataset of 24 trade partners from 1960 to 2023, we find that policy uncertainty indicators negatively affect China's trade efficiency only at lower to middle quantiles (10th to 60th), while inflation expectations show positive impacts particularly at higher quantiles. Our findings indicate that more efficient trade partners demonstrate higher resilience to policy uncertainty shocks, and this negative effect is more pronounced post-global financial crisis but less severe under free trade agreements, especially in the Asia-Pacific region. Our results are robust to alternative measures of policy uncertainty and alternative statistical techniques. To enhance trade efficiency and resilience, policymakers should prioritize implementing effective risk management strategies while fostering stronger partnerships with more efficient counterparts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 237-263"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the asymmetric impact of non-fundamental behavioral shocks on trade efficiency: Evidence from China's trade partners\",\"authors\":\"Chien-Chiang Lee , Farzan Yahya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent global events and trade tensions have significantly impacted international trade dynamics, yet the role of non-fundamental behavioral shocks in shaping trade relationships remains understudied, particularly for major trading nations like China. This study investigates the impact of policy uncertainty and inflation expectations on China's trade efficiency. Using smoothed instrumental variable quantile regression (SIVQR) on a panel dataset of 24 trade partners from 1960 to 2023, we find that policy uncertainty indicators negatively affect China's trade efficiency only at lower to middle quantiles (10th to 60th), while inflation expectations show positive impacts particularly at higher quantiles. Our findings indicate that more efficient trade partners demonstrate higher resilience to policy uncertainty shocks, and this negative effect is more pronounced post-global financial crisis but less severe under free trade agreements, especially in the Asia-Pacific region. Our results are robust to alternative measures of policy uncertainty and alternative statistical techniques. To enhance trade efficiency and resilience, policymakers should prioritize implementing effective risk management strategies while fostering stronger partnerships with more efficient counterparts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 237-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003716\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the asymmetric impact of non-fundamental behavioral shocks on trade efficiency: Evidence from China's trade partners
Recent global events and trade tensions have significantly impacted international trade dynamics, yet the role of non-fundamental behavioral shocks in shaping trade relationships remains understudied, particularly for major trading nations like China. This study investigates the impact of policy uncertainty and inflation expectations on China's trade efficiency. Using smoothed instrumental variable quantile regression (SIVQR) on a panel dataset of 24 trade partners from 1960 to 2023, we find that policy uncertainty indicators negatively affect China's trade efficiency only at lower to middle quantiles (10th to 60th), while inflation expectations show positive impacts particularly at higher quantiles. Our findings indicate that more efficient trade partners demonstrate higher resilience to policy uncertainty shocks, and this negative effect is more pronounced post-global financial crisis but less severe under free trade agreements, especially in the Asia-Pacific region. Our results are robust to alternative measures of policy uncertainty and alternative statistical techniques. To enhance trade efficiency and resilience, policymakers should prioritize implementing effective risk management strategies while fostering stronger partnerships with more efficient counterparts.
期刊介绍:
Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.