绵羊放牧制度对尼日利亚农业流域土壤、产量和物种多样性的影响

Q2 Environmental Science
Chukwudi Nwaogu , Modupeola A.O. Chukwudi , Bridget E. Diagi , Deborah Omozusi Diagi , Adaeze A. Ojiaku , Leonard U. Mgbeahuruike , Rapuruchukwu N. Unegbu , Kassim Ismail Abdullahi , Yakubu A. Ameh , Friday A. Edo , Victor A. Agidi , Chidinma A. Acholonu , Chinonye V. Ekweogu , Michael I. Nmecha , Abdulfatai A. Bello , Moses A. Abua
{"title":"绵羊放牧制度对尼日利亚农业流域土壤、产量和物种多样性的影响","authors":"Chukwudi Nwaogu ,&nbsp;Modupeola A.O. Chukwudi ,&nbsp;Bridget E. Diagi ,&nbsp;Deborah Omozusi Diagi ,&nbsp;Adaeze A. Ojiaku ,&nbsp;Leonard U. Mgbeahuruike ,&nbsp;Rapuruchukwu N. Unegbu ,&nbsp;Kassim Ismail Abdullahi ,&nbsp;Yakubu A. Ameh ,&nbsp;Friday A. Edo ,&nbsp;Victor A. Agidi ,&nbsp;Chidinma A. Acholonu ,&nbsp;Chinonye V. Ekweogu ,&nbsp;Michael I. Nmecha ,&nbsp;Abdulfatai A. Bello ,&nbsp;Moses A. Abua","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intensified grazing pressure and forest conversion to pasture affect biodiversity of the forest-grassland transition zone in Imo River watershed, Nigeria. This study assessed how different grazing systems influence soil properties and plant biodiversity in an intensively managed agricultural watershed. It is hypothesized that plant diversity and richness would decrease substantially with continuous grazing (CG) and heavy grazing whereas rotational grazing (RG) would enhance soil N, C, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), and biodiversity under light grazing. In a research period that covered two seasons (2023 and 2024), vegetation, soil, and climate data were collected. ANOVA was used to determine the differences and effects of the grazing systems on the vegetation parameters. Management systems (<em>P</em> = 0.011) and grazing intensities (<em>P</em> = 0.023) significantly affected the ANPP, NPPdiff (<em>P</em> = 0.045) and RGR (<em>P</em> = 0.000). Similarly, plants’ composition was significantly affected by different management systems (<em>P</em> = 0.016), grazing intensities (<em>P</em> = 0.001), and year (<em>P</em> = 0.035). Soil total N in RG was over 50 % higher than the content in CG and 15 % higher than that under UG. During the specified study seasons, species diversity and richness were over 30 % higher in RG than in CG and UG. In contrast, the specific plant height (SPH) and ANPP values observed in UG were over 40 % larger than those recorded in either RG or CG. Except for the forbs, all the species coverages were at least 10 % higher under light grazing compared to heavy grazing. Consequently, a sustainable grazing system (e.g. RG) with light or moderate stocking rate could increase soil N, plant diversity, and aboveground biomass productivity in Imo watershed. The study could be beneficial to the smallholder farmers and all the stakeholders in food security and production chain, especially in the prevailing climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of sheep grazing systems on soil, yield, and species diversity in an agricultural watershed, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Chukwudi Nwaogu ,&nbsp;Modupeola A.O. Chukwudi ,&nbsp;Bridget E. Diagi ,&nbsp;Deborah Omozusi Diagi ,&nbsp;Adaeze A. Ojiaku ,&nbsp;Leonard U. Mgbeahuruike ,&nbsp;Rapuruchukwu N. Unegbu ,&nbsp;Kassim Ismail Abdullahi ,&nbsp;Yakubu A. Ameh ,&nbsp;Friday A. Edo ,&nbsp;Victor A. Agidi ,&nbsp;Chidinma A. Acholonu ,&nbsp;Chinonye V. Ekweogu ,&nbsp;Michael I. Nmecha ,&nbsp;Abdulfatai A. Bello ,&nbsp;Moses A. Abua\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intensified grazing pressure and forest conversion to pasture affect biodiversity of the forest-grassland transition zone in Imo River watershed, Nigeria. This study assessed how different grazing systems influence soil properties and plant biodiversity in an intensively managed agricultural watershed. It is hypothesized that plant diversity and richness would decrease substantially with continuous grazing (CG) and heavy grazing whereas rotational grazing (RG) would enhance soil N, C, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), and biodiversity under light grazing. In a research period that covered two seasons (2023 and 2024), vegetation, soil, and climate data were collected. ANOVA was used to determine the differences and effects of the grazing systems on the vegetation parameters. Management systems (<em>P</em> = 0.011) and grazing intensities (<em>P</em> = 0.023) significantly affected the ANPP, NPPdiff (<em>P</em> = 0.045) and RGR (<em>P</em> = 0.000). Similarly, plants’ composition was significantly affected by different management systems (<em>P</em> = 0.016), grazing intensities (<em>P</em> = 0.001), and year (<em>P</em> = 0.035). Soil total N in RG was over 50 % higher than the content in CG and 15 % higher than that under UG. During the specified study seasons, species diversity and richness were over 30 % higher in RG than in CG and UG. In contrast, the specific plant height (SPH) and ANPP values observed in UG were over 40 % larger than those recorded in either RG or CG. Except for the forbs, all the species coverages were at least 10 % higher under light grazing compared to heavy grazing. Consequently, a sustainable grazing system (e.g. RG) with light or moderate stocking rate could increase soil N, plant diversity, and aboveground biomass productivity in Imo watershed. The study could be beneficial to the smallholder farmers and all the stakeholders in food security and production chain, especially in the prevailing climate change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025002379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025002379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放牧压力加剧和森林向牧场的转变影响了尼日利亚伊莫河流域森林-草地过渡带的生物多样性。本研究评估了不同放牧制度对集约管理农业流域土壤性质和植物生物多样性的影响。连续放牧(CG)和重度放牧会显著降低植物多样性和丰富度,而轮牧(RG)会提高轻度放牧下土壤N、C、地上净初级生产力(ANPP)和生物多样性。在一个涵盖两个季节(2023年和2024年)的研究期间,收集了植被、土壤和气候数据。利用方差分析分析放牧制度对植被参数的影响。管理制度(P = 0.011)和放牧强度(P = 0.023)显著影响ANPP、NPPdiff (P = 0.045)和RGR (P = 0.000)。同样,不同管理制度(P = 0.016)、放牧强度(P = 0.001)和年份(P = 0.035)对植物组成也有显著影响。RG处理土壤全氮含量比CG处理高50%以上,比UG处理高15%。在特定的研究季节,RG的物种多样性和丰富度比CG和UG高30%以上。相比之下,UG的比株高(SPH)和ANPP值比RG和CG高40%以上。除牧草外,轻放牧条件下各物种盖度均比重放牧条件下高10%以上。因此,轻度或中度载畜率的可持续放牧系统(如RG)可以提高Imo流域土壤氮、植物多样性和地上生物量生产力。该研究对小农和粮食安全和生产链中的所有利益相关者都是有益的,特别是在当前气候变化的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of sheep grazing systems on soil, yield, and species diversity in an agricultural watershed, Nigeria
Intensified grazing pressure and forest conversion to pasture affect biodiversity of the forest-grassland transition zone in Imo River watershed, Nigeria. This study assessed how different grazing systems influence soil properties and plant biodiversity in an intensively managed agricultural watershed. It is hypothesized that plant diversity and richness would decrease substantially with continuous grazing (CG) and heavy grazing whereas rotational grazing (RG) would enhance soil N, C, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), and biodiversity under light grazing. In a research period that covered two seasons (2023 and 2024), vegetation, soil, and climate data were collected. ANOVA was used to determine the differences and effects of the grazing systems on the vegetation parameters. Management systems (P = 0.011) and grazing intensities (P = 0.023) significantly affected the ANPP, NPPdiff (P = 0.045) and RGR (P = 0.000). Similarly, plants’ composition was significantly affected by different management systems (P = 0.016), grazing intensities (P = 0.001), and year (P = 0.035). Soil total N in RG was over 50 % higher than the content in CG and 15 % higher than that under UG. During the specified study seasons, species diversity and richness were over 30 % higher in RG than in CG and UG. In contrast, the specific plant height (SPH) and ANPP values observed in UG were over 40 % larger than those recorded in either RG or CG. Except for the forbs, all the species coverages were at least 10 % higher under light grazing compared to heavy grazing. Consequently, a sustainable grazing system (e.g. RG) with light or moderate stocking rate could increase soil N, plant diversity, and aboveground biomass productivity in Imo watershed. The study could be beneficial to the smallholder farmers and all the stakeholders in food security and production chain, especially in the prevailing climate change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信