Alessandra Lazazzara , Stefano Za , Andri Georgiadou
{"title":"探索人工智能支持的工作场所包容性的分类框架和流程模型","authors":"Alessandra Lazazzara , Stefano Za , Andri Georgiadou","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a taxonomy framework and a process model to explain how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes workplace inclusion through human resource management (HRM) practices. We analyze 25 empirical studies using a hybrid inductive–deductive method informed by <span><span>Nickerson et al.’s (2013)</span></span> taxonomy development framework. The resulting taxonomy classifies AI-enabled HRM practices according to their strategic goals, types of human-AI interaction, inclusion typologies, evaluation methods, and mitigation strategies. We extend this taxonomy with a process model that illustrates how different forms of AI agency – ranging from assisting to automating − shape inclusion outcomes and require differentiated mitigation strategies. Our analysis reveals three interconnected dimensions of AI-enabled workplace inclusion emerge in such contexts: inclusion in work (individual experiences), inclusion at work (organizational climate), and inclusion of work (human-AI interaction). Each dimension demands distinct context-sensitive mitigation strategies depending on the level AI agency involved By linking AI agency to differentiated forms of inclusion and tailored mitigation strategies, this study advances theoretical understanding of AI-enabled inclusion. It also offers actionable guidance for organizations implementing AI in HRM practices while safeguarding workplace inclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115697"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A taxonomy framework and process model to explore AI-enabled workplace inclusion\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Lazazzara , Stefano Za , Andri Georgiadou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study develops a taxonomy framework and a process model to explain how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes workplace inclusion through human resource management (HRM) practices. We analyze 25 empirical studies using a hybrid inductive–deductive method informed by <span><span>Nickerson et al.’s (2013)</span></span> taxonomy development framework. The resulting taxonomy classifies AI-enabled HRM practices according to their strategic goals, types of human-AI interaction, inclusion typologies, evaluation methods, and mitigation strategies. We extend this taxonomy with a process model that illustrates how different forms of AI agency – ranging from assisting to automating − shape inclusion outcomes and require differentiated mitigation strategies. Our analysis reveals three interconnected dimensions of AI-enabled workplace inclusion emerge in such contexts: inclusion in work (individual experiences), inclusion at work (organizational climate), and inclusion of work (human-AI interaction). Each dimension demands distinct context-sensitive mitigation strategies depending on the level AI agency involved By linking AI agency to differentiated forms of inclusion and tailored mitigation strategies, this study advances theoretical understanding of AI-enabled inclusion. It also offers actionable guidance for organizations implementing AI in HRM practices while safeguarding workplace inclusion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500520X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500520X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A taxonomy framework and process model to explore AI-enabled workplace inclusion
This study develops a taxonomy framework and a process model to explain how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes workplace inclusion through human resource management (HRM) practices. We analyze 25 empirical studies using a hybrid inductive–deductive method informed by Nickerson et al.’s (2013) taxonomy development framework. The resulting taxonomy classifies AI-enabled HRM practices according to their strategic goals, types of human-AI interaction, inclusion typologies, evaluation methods, and mitigation strategies. We extend this taxonomy with a process model that illustrates how different forms of AI agency – ranging from assisting to automating − shape inclusion outcomes and require differentiated mitigation strategies. Our analysis reveals three interconnected dimensions of AI-enabled workplace inclusion emerge in such contexts: inclusion in work (individual experiences), inclusion at work (organizational climate), and inclusion of work (human-AI interaction). Each dimension demands distinct context-sensitive mitigation strategies depending on the level AI agency involved By linking AI agency to differentiated forms of inclusion and tailored mitigation strategies, this study advances theoretical understanding of AI-enabled inclusion. It also offers actionable guidance for organizations implementing AI in HRM practices while safeguarding workplace inclusion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.