Alexander Mueller , Sabine Kuester , Sergej von Janda
{"title":"人工智能的社会(不可接受)错误:消费者对不同人工智能导致的错误的看法","authors":"Alexander Mueller , Sabine Kuester , Sergej von Janda","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) commonly errs in practice. This study investigates consumer responses to two distinct types of errors: technical errors stemming from technological disruptions in algorithmic processes and social errors, which involve violations of social norms. These distinctions are critical, as our research reveals different consumer response patterns based on error type and error severity. Grounded in the theory of mind perception and expectation disconfirmation theory, we present findings from multiple experiments demonstrating that severe errors, regardless of type, evoke negative consumer responses. In contrast, minor social errors seem anticipated and mostly elicit responses more akin to those for error-free AI performance. However, in the realm of self-learning AI, these minor social errors are problematic. They can perpetuate the stigmatization of minorities and ethnic groups, highlighting the urgent need to prevent AI from violating social norms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115673"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially (un)acceptable errors of AI: Consumer perceptions of different AI-induced errors\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Mueller , Sabine Kuester , Sergej von Janda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) commonly errs in practice. This study investigates consumer responses to two distinct types of errors: technical errors stemming from technological disruptions in algorithmic processes and social errors, which involve violations of social norms. These distinctions are critical, as our research reveals different consumer response patterns based on error type and error severity. Grounded in the theory of mind perception and expectation disconfirmation theory, we present findings from multiple experiments demonstrating that severe errors, regardless of type, evoke negative consumer responses. In contrast, minor social errors seem anticipated and mostly elicit responses more akin to those for error-free AI performance. However, in the realm of self-learning AI, these minor social errors are problematic. They can perpetuate the stigmatization of minorities and ethnic groups, highlighting the urgent need to prevent AI from violating social norms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socially (un)acceptable errors of AI: Consumer perceptions of different AI-induced errors
Artificial intelligence (AI) commonly errs in practice. This study investigates consumer responses to two distinct types of errors: technical errors stemming from technological disruptions in algorithmic processes and social errors, which involve violations of social norms. These distinctions are critical, as our research reveals different consumer response patterns based on error type and error severity. Grounded in the theory of mind perception and expectation disconfirmation theory, we present findings from multiple experiments demonstrating that severe errors, regardless of type, evoke negative consumer responses. In contrast, minor social errors seem anticipated and mostly elicit responses more akin to those for error-free AI performance. However, in the realm of self-learning AI, these minor social errors are problematic. They can perpetuate the stigmatization of minorities and ethnic groups, highlighting the urgent need to prevent AI from violating social norms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.