人工智能的社会(不可接受)错误:消费者对不同人工智能导致的错误的看法

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Alexander Mueller , Sabine Kuester , Sergej von Janda
{"title":"人工智能的社会(不可接受)错误:消费者对不同人工智能导致的错误的看法","authors":"Alexander Mueller ,&nbsp;Sabine Kuester ,&nbsp;Sergej von Janda","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) commonly errs in practice. This study investigates consumer responses to two distinct types of errors: technical errors stemming from technological disruptions in algorithmic processes and social errors, which involve violations of social norms. These distinctions are critical, as our research reveals different consumer response patterns based on error type and error severity. Grounded in the theory of mind perception and expectation disconfirmation theory, we present findings from multiple experiments demonstrating that severe errors, regardless of type, evoke negative consumer responses. In contrast, minor social errors seem anticipated and mostly elicit responses more akin to those for error-free AI performance. However, in the realm of self-learning AI, these minor social errors are problematic. They can perpetuate the stigmatization of minorities and ethnic groups, highlighting the urgent need to prevent AI from violating social norms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115673"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially (un)acceptable errors of AI: Consumer perceptions of different AI-induced errors\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Mueller ,&nbsp;Sabine Kuester ,&nbsp;Sergej von Janda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) commonly errs in practice. This study investigates consumer responses to two distinct types of errors: technical errors stemming from technological disruptions in algorithmic processes and social errors, which involve violations of social norms. These distinctions are critical, as our research reveals different consumer response patterns based on error type and error severity. Grounded in the theory of mind perception and expectation disconfirmation theory, we present findings from multiple experiments demonstrating that severe errors, regardless of type, evoke negative consumer responses. In contrast, minor social errors seem anticipated and mostly elicit responses more akin to those for error-free AI performance. However, in the realm of self-learning AI, these minor social errors are problematic. They can perpetuate the stigmatization of minorities and ethnic groups, highlighting the urgent need to prevent AI from violating social norms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在实践中经常出错。本研究调查了消费者对两种不同类型错误的反应:源于算法过程中的技术中断的技术错误和涉及违反社会规范的社会错误。这些区别是至关重要的,因为我们的研究揭示了基于错误类型和错误严重程度的不同消费者反应模式。基于心理感知理论和期望失证理论,我们提出了多个实验的结果,证明严重的错误,无论类型如何,都会引起消费者的负面反应。相比之下,轻微的社交错误似乎是可以预料到的,而且大多数情况下引发的反应更类似于没有错误的人工智能表现。然而,在自我学习的人工智能领域,这些小的社会错误是有问题的。它们可能使对少数民族和族裔群体的污名化永久化,凸显了防止人工智能违反社会规范的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socially (un)acceptable errors of AI: Consumer perceptions of different AI-induced errors
Artificial intelligence (AI) commonly errs in practice. This study investigates consumer responses to two distinct types of errors: technical errors stemming from technological disruptions in algorithmic processes and social errors, which involve violations of social norms. These distinctions are critical, as our research reveals different consumer response patterns based on error type and error severity. Grounded in the theory of mind perception and expectation disconfirmation theory, we present findings from multiple experiments demonstrating that severe errors, regardless of type, evoke negative consumer responses. In contrast, minor social errors seem anticipated and mostly elicit responses more akin to those for error-free AI performance. However, in the realm of self-learning AI, these minor social errors are problematic. They can perpetuate the stigmatization of minorities and ethnic groups, highlighting the urgent need to prevent AI from violating social norms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信