气候否认的多模式叙事:一种新颖的、视觉优先的方法,用于分析Instagram上的阴谋论话语

IF 3.1 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Caroline Gardam, Michelle Riedlinger, Daniel Angus, Xue Ying (Jane) Tan
{"title":"气候否认的多模式叙事:一种新颖的、视觉优先的方法,用于分析Instagram上的阴谋论话语","authors":"Caroline Gardam,&nbsp;Michelle Riedlinger,&nbsp;Daniel Angus,&nbsp;Xue Ying (Jane) Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Problematic information about climate change in online spaces can impact public awareness about climate change’s causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies, contributing to declining trust in science and diminished effectiveness of climate policies. Problematic climate discourses often overlap with conspiratorial material in denial communities; members may hold low levels of trust in social institutions. On social media, misinformation travels further and faster when it is multimodal, yet this area of scholarship remains relatively unexamined, particularly on the distinctly multimodal platform, Instagram. This paper uses a corpus of Instagram posts labelled with the hashtag #climatechangehoax to develop a visual-first methodology for analysing problematic climate change content on social media. Combining unsupervised machine learning, co-hashtag analysis, and multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA), we identify dominant visual clusters and examine how the semiotic resources present within a cluster’s posts can articulate meaning. The most salient visual signature that we identified aligns climate denial and the chemtrails conspiracy theory; this signature predominantly comprises photographs of skies containing clouds or condensation trails. Within this cluster, other modalities entreat the viewer to use their own senses for proof, together representing an interdiscursive formation where embodied perception (“Look to the skies”) is privileged over scientific authority. Here, visual cues are reconfigured as evidence of elite deception. Hashtags in post text reinforce these conspiratorial meanings and, through co-hashtag networks, structurally align climate denial within an assemblage of anti-elite, post-truth discourse, and the broader conspiratorial community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 100946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal narratives of climate denial: A novel, visual-first methodology for analysing conspiracy theory discourse on Instagram\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Gardam,&nbsp;Michelle Riedlinger,&nbsp;Daniel Angus,&nbsp;Xue Ying (Jane) Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Problematic information about climate change in online spaces can impact public awareness about climate change’s causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies, contributing to declining trust in science and diminished effectiveness of climate policies. Problematic climate discourses often overlap with conspiratorial material in denial communities; members may hold low levels of trust in social institutions. On social media, misinformation travels further and faster when it is multimodal, yet this area of scholarship remains relatively unexamined, particularly on the distinctly multimodal platform, Instagram. This paper uses a corpus of Instagram posts labelled with the hashtag #climatechangehoax to develop a visual-first methodology for analysing problematic climate change content on social media. Combining unsupervised machine learning, co-hashtag analysis, and multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA), we identify dominant visual clusters and examine how the semiotic resources present within a cluster’s posts can articulate meaning. The most salient visual signature that we identified aligns climate denial and the chemtrails conspiracy theory; this signature predominantly comprises photographs of skies containing clouds or condensation trails. Within this cluster, other modalities entreat the viewer to use their own senses for proof, together representing an interdiscursive formation where embodied perception (“Look to the skies”) is privileged over scientific authority. Here, visual cues are reconfigured as evidence of elite deception. Hashtags in post text reinforce these conspiratorial meanings and, through co-hashtag networks, structurally align climate denial within an assemblage of anti-elite, post-truth discourse, and the broader conspiratorial community.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse Context & Media\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse Context & Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695825000959\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695825000959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线空间中关于气候变化的有问题的信息可能影响公众对气候变化的原因、影响和缓解战略的认识,从而导致对科学的信任度下降,气候政策的有效性降低。有问题的气候话语经常与否认社区的阴谋材料重叠;成员对社会机构的信任度可能较低。在社交媒体上,多模式传播的错误信息传播得更远、更快,但这一领域的学术研究相对而言仍未得到研究,尤其是在明显的多模式平台Instagram上。本文使用带有#climatechangehoax标签的Instagram帖子语料库来开发一种视觉优先的方法,用于分析社交媒体上有问题的气候变化内容。结合无监督机器学习、共同标签分析和多模态批评话语分析(MCDA),我们确定了占主导地位的视觉聚类,并研究了聚类帖子中存在的符号资源如何表达意义。我们发现的最显著的视觉特征是否认气候变化和化学痕迹阴谋论;这一特征主要包括包含云或凝结痕迹的天空照片。在这个集群中,其他形式恳求观众用自己的感官来证明,共同代表了一种话语间的形成,在这种形成中,具体化的感知(“仰望天空”)比科学权威更有特权。在这里,视觉线索被重新配置为精英欺骗的证据。帖子中的标签强化了这些阴谋论的含义,并通过共同的标签网络,在反精英、后真相话语和更广泛的阴谋论社区的集合中,从结构上使气候否认保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multimodal narratives of climate denial: A novel, visual-first methodology for analysing conspiracy theory discourse on Instagram

Multimodal narratives of climate denial: A novel, visual-first methodology for analysing conspiracy theory discourse on Instagram
Problematic information about climate change in online spaces can impact public awareness about climate change’s causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies, contributing to declining trust in science and diminished effectiveness of climate policies. Problematic climate discourses often overlap with conspiratorial material in denial communities; members may hold low levels of trust in social institutions. On social media, misinformation travels further and faster when it is multimodal, yet this area of scholarship remains relatively unexamined, particularly on the distinctly multimodal platform, Instagram. This paper uses a corpus of Instagram posts labelled with the hashtag #climatechangehoax to develop a visual-first methodology for analysing problematic climate change content on social media. Combining unsupervised machine learning, co-hashtag analysis, and multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA), we identify dominant visual clusters and examine how the semiotic resources present within a cluster’s posts can articulate meaning. The most salient visual signature that we identified aligns climate denial and the chemtrails conspiracy theory; this signature predominantly comprises photographs of skies containing clouds or condensation trails. Within this cluster, other modalities entreat the viewer to use their own senses for proof, together representing an interdiscursive formation where embodied perception (“Look to the skies”) is privileged over scientific authority. Here, visual cues are reconfigured as evidence of elite deception. Hashtags in post text reinforce these conspiratorial meanings and, through co-hashtag networks, structurally align climate denial within an assemblage of anti-elite, post-truth discourse, and the broader conspiratorial community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信