基于神经网络的多核素谱识别方法比较分析

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Fei Li , Shuang Qi , Zehan Li , Haoran Cao , Shuting Yang , Jun Liu , Chundi Fan
{"title":"基于神经网络的多核素谱识别方法比较分析","authors":"Fei Li ,&nbsp;Shuang Qi ,&nbsp;Zehan Li ,&nbsp;Haoran Cao ,&nbsp;Shuting Yang ,&nbsp;Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Chundi Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.net.2025.103914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the limitations of traditional peak-finding approaches in complex radiation environments, this paper conducts a systematic comparative analysis of multi-nuclide energy spectrum recognition technology based on neural network methods. Eight nuclides from the industrial nuclide library are selected for the study. The energy spectrum dataset is constructed through the Monte Carlo simulation method, and the performance of four typical neural network models (BP, CNN, ResNet and LSTM) in nuclide identification is compared. The experimental results show that the ResNet model exhibits optimal performance under both expected label formats (1 × 8 and 1 × 1024). Its nuclide recognition accuracy rate is as high as 87.6 %, the average error of relative activity prediction is the lowest at 0.14, and it significantly outperforms other models in weak peak recovery and anti-interference ability. CNN and BP models perform second best in complex tasks, while LSTM models have relatively limited performance due to the indistinct characteristics of energy spectrum sequences. In addition, ResNet demonstrated excellent stability in both high and low activity ranges, verifying its practical application potential in complex radiation fields. This study provides a reference for model selection in the field of nuclide identification and promotes the optimization of neural networks in energy spectrum analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19272,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"Article 103914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of multi-nuclide spectrum recognition methods based on neural network\",\"authors\":\"Fei Li ,&nbsp;Shuang Qi ,&nbsp;Zehan Li ,&nbsp;Haoran Cao ,&nbsp;Shuting Yang ,&nbsp;Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Chundi Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.net.2025.103914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To address the limitations of traditional peak-finding approaches in complex radiation environments, this paper conducts a systematic comparative analysis of multi-nuclide energy spectrum recognition technology based on neural network methods. Eight nuclides from the industrial nuclide library are selected for the study. The energy spectrum dataset is constructed through the Monte Carlo simulation method, and the performance of four typical neural network models (BP, CNN, ResNet and LSTM) in nuclide identification is compared. The experimental results show that the ResNet model exhibits optimal performance under both expected label formats (1 × 8 and 1 × 1024). Its nuclide recognition accuracy rate is as high as 87.6 %, the average error of relative activity prediction is the lowest at 0.14, and it significantly outperforms other models in weak peak recovery and anti-interference ability. CNN and BP models perform second best in complex tasks, while LSTM models have relatively limited performance due to the indistinct characteristics of energy spectrum sequences. In addition, ResNet demonstrated excellent stability in both high and low activity ranges, verifying its practical application potential in complex radiation fields. This study provides a reference for model selection in the field of nuclide identification and promotes the optimization of neural networks in energy spectrum analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 103914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573325004826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573325004826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对传统寻峰方法在复杂辐射环境下的局限性,本文对基于神经网络方法的多核素能谱识别技术进行了系统的对比分析。从工业核素库中选择了8种核素进行研究。通过蒙特卡罗模拟方法构建能谱数据集,比较了4种典型神经网络模型(BP、CNN、ResNet和LSTM)在核素识别中的性能。实验结果表明,ResNet模型在预期标签格式(1 × 8和1 × 1024)下均表现出最佳性能。其核素识别准确率高达87.6%,相对活度预测平均误差最低,为0.14,在弱峰恢复和抗干扰能力方面明显优于其他模型。CNN和BP模型在复杂任务中的表现次之,而LSTM模型由于能谱序列特征不清晰,性能相对有限。此外,ResNet在高、低活性范围内均表现出优异的稳定性,验证了其在复杂辐射领域的实际应用潜力。该研究为核素识别领域的模型选择提供了参考,促进了神经网络在能谱分析中的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of multi-nuclide spectrum recognition methods based on neural network
To address the limitations of traditional peak-finding approaches in complex radiation environments, this paper conducts a systematic comparative analysis of multi-nuclide energy spectrum recognition technology based on neural network methods. Eight nuclides from the industrial nuclide library are selected for the study. The energy spectrum dataset is constructed through the Monte Carlo simulation method, and the performance of four typical neural network models (BP, CNN, ResNet and LSTM) in nuclide identification is compared. The experimental results show that the ResNet model exhibits optimal performance under both expected label formats (1 × 8 and 1 × 1024). Its nuclide recognition accuracy rate is as high as 87.6 %, the average error of relative activity prediction is the lowest at 0.14, and it significantly outperforms other models in weak peak recovery and anti-interference ability. CNN and BP models perform second best in complex tasks, while LSTM models have relatively limited performance due to the indistinct characteristics of energy spectrum sequences. In addition, ResNet demonstrated excellent stability in both high and low activity ranges, verifying its practical application potential in complex radiation fields. This study provides a reference for model selection in the field of nuclide identification and promotes the optimization of neural networks in energy spectrum analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Nuclear Engineering and Technology 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
431
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Technology (NET), an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society (KNS), publishes peer-reviewed papers on original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear science and technology. NET bimonthly publishes original articles, reviews, and technical notes. The journal is listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of Thomson Reuters. NET covers all fields for peaceful utilization of nuclear energy and radiation as follows: 1) Reactor Physics 2) Thermal Hydraulics 3) Nuclear Safety 4) Nuclear I&C 5) Nuclear Physics, Fusion, and Laser Technology 6) Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Radioactive Waste Management 7) Nuclear Fuel and Reactor Materials 8) Radiation Application 9) Radiation Protection 10) Nuclear Structural Analysis and Plant Management & Maintenance 11) Nuclear Policy, Economics, and Human Resource Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信