Sining Lyu , Qiuxia Zou , Junda Quan , Ning Zhang , Kairui Hu , Lianzheng Gui , Wenbo Yu , Sha Liang , Huabo Duan , Jiakuan Yang
{"title":"从实验室到工业规模:如何评价水泥和水泥基材料的碳矿化","authors":"Sining Lyu , Qiuxia Zou , Junda Quan , Ning Zhang , Kairui Hu , Lianzheng Gui , Wenbo Yu , Sha Liang , Huabo Duan , Jiakuan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cement production is a major source of global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Carbon mineralization presents a promising pathway for emission reduction across the lifecycle of cement and cement-based materials (CCM). This study systematically evaluates the mineralization potential of CCM by integrating reaction mechanisms, sequestration efficiencies, techno-economic constraints, and policy considerations. The process is thermodynamically favorable and kinetically tunable, converting CO<sub>2</sub> into stable CaCO<sub>3</sub> through reactions with Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>, C-S-H, and unhydrated clinker. Distinct carbonation mechanisms operate at different stages—early-age carbonation during mixing, strength and durability gains during curing, and pore filling in recycled aggregates at end-of-life. Sequestration efficiency varies by stage: low in mixing (0.616–2.21 kg/m<sup>3</sup>), high in curing (35.0–113.47 kg/m<sup>3</sup>), and moderate in RCA treatment (16.9–58.0 g/kg aggregates). Co-sequestration of NO<sub>x</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> further enhances environmental performance, though challenges such as gas diffusion limitations and competitive adsorption persist. While natural carbonation offsets 30–55 % of process emissions, fully scaled accelerated carbonation could sequester up to 483 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub> annually. Industrial application remains limited by CO<sub>2</sub> capture logistics, flue gas purity, and infrastructure demands. High capital costs—especially for curing systems—require supportive policy, carbon pricing, and optimized logistics. Life cycle assessments (LCA) confirm environmental benefits, especially with CO<sub>2</sub> curing. However, successful large-scale implementation will require coordinated innovation in materials science, process design, and regulatory frameworks to realize the full mitigation potential of CCM-based mineralization technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108171"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From laboratory to industrial scale: How to evaluate the carbon mineralization of cement and cement-based materials\",\"authors\":\"Sining Lyu , Qiuxia Zou , Junda Quan , Ning Zhang , Kairui Hu , Lianzheng Gui , Wenbo Yu , Sha Liang , Huabo Duan , Jiakuan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cement production is a major source of global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Carbon mineralization presents a promising pathway for emission reduction across the lifecycle of cement and cement-based materials (CCM). This study systematically evaluates the mineralization potential of CCM by integrating reaction mechanisms, sequestration efficiencies, techno-economic constraints, and policy considerations. The process is thermodynamically favorable and kinetically tunable, converting CO<sub>2</sub> into stable CaCO<sub>3</sub> through reactions with Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>, C-S-H, and unhydrated clinker. Distinct carbonation mechanisms operate at different stages—early-age carbonation during mixing, strength and durability gains during curing, and pore filling in recycled aggregates at end-of-life. Sequestration efficiency varies by stage: low in mixing (0.616–2.21 kg/m<sup>3</sup>), high in curing (35.0–113.47 kg/m<sup>3</sup>), and moderate in RCA treatment (16.9–58.0 g/kg aggregates). Co-sequestration of NO<sub>x</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> further enhances environmental performance, though challenges such as gas diffusion limitations and competitive adsorption persist. While natural carbonation offsets 30–55 % of process emissions, fully scaled accelerated carbonation could sequester up to 483 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub> annually. Industrial application remains limited by CO<sub>2</sub> capture logistics, flue gas purity, and infrastructure demands. High capital costs—especially for curing systems—require supportive policy, carbon pricing, and optimized logistics. Life cycle assessments (LCA) confirm environmental benefits, especially with CO<sub>2</sub> curing. However, successful large-scale implementation will require coordinated innovation in materials science, process design, and regulatory frameworks to realize the full mitigation potential of CCM-based mineralization technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003683\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003683","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
From laboratory to industrial scale: How to evaluate the carbon mineralization of cement and cement-based materials
Cement production is a major source of global CO2 emissions. Carbon mineralization presents a promising pathway for emission reduction across the lifecycle of cement and cement-based materials (CCM). This study systematically evaluates the mineralization potential of CCM by integrating reaction mechanisms, sequestration efficiencies, techno-economic constraints, and policy considerations. The process is thermodynamically favorable and kinetically tunable, converting CO2 into stable CaCO3 through reactions with Ca(OH)2, C-S-H, and unhydrated clinker. Distinct carbonation mechanisms operate at different stages—early-age carbonation during mixing, strength and durability gains during curing, and pore filling in recycled aggregates at end-of-life. Sequestration efficiency varies by stage: low in mixing (0.616–2.21 kg/m3), high in curing (35.0–113.47 kg/m3), and moderate in RCA treatment (16.9–58.0 g/kg aggregates). Co-sequestration of NOx and SOx further enhances environmental performance, though challenges such as gas diffusion limitations and competitive adsorption persist. While natural carbonation offsets 30–55 % of process emissions, fully scaled accelerated carbonation could sequester up to 483 Mt. CO2 annually. Industrial application remains limited by CO2 capture logistics, flue gas purity, and infrastructure demands. High capital costs—especially for curing systems—require supportive policy, carbon pricing, and optimized logistics. Life cycle assessments (LCA) confirm environmental benefits, especially with CO2 curing. However, successful large-scale implementation will require coordinated innovation in materials science, process design, and regulatory frameworks to realize the full mitigation potential of CCM-based mineralization technologies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.