氢能部署中的战略动态:竞争、合作与合作的博弈论回顾

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Emmanuel Kwesi Arthur , Sofía De-León Almaraz , Tamás Solymosi
{"title":"氢能部署中的战略动态:竞争、合作与合作的博弈论回顾","authors":"Emmanuel Kwesi Arthur ,&nbsp;Sofía De-León Almaraz ,&nbsp;Tamás Solymosi","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As hydrogen products emerge as a promising energy alternative in multiple sectors, low carbon hydrogen supply chains require concerted efforts among a diverse array of stakeholders. Within an evolving energy transition landscape, stakeholders' competition and cooperation play a critical role in expediting the deployment of the hydrogen economy. In this review, different strategies referred to as <em>Hydrogen Competition, Cooperation, and Coopetition</em> (H2CCC) dynamics are analyzed from the lenses of game theory. The study employs hybrid literature review methodology, integrating both bibliometric and structured review approaches. The study reveals that competition and cooperation represent a contrasting but interconnected dynamics that drive the energy transition. Coopetition models are less common. Furthermore, it is observed that Integrated Energy Systems are mainly used in cooperative and coopetitive approaches while H<sub>2</sub> technologies and Hydrogen Supply Chains are more explored in competitive approaches. Industrial and mobility sectors are present in H2CCC dynamics with technological players more present than institutional entities. Maps, definitions, gaps and perspectives are developed. These insights may be valuable for policymakers, industry stakeholders, modelers, and researchers. There remains a need for further empirical H2CCC case studies and applications of pure coopetitive games.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116293"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic dynamics in hydrogen deployment: A game-theoretical review of competition, cooperation, and coopetition\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Kwesi Arthur ,&nbsp;Sofía De-León Almaraz ,&nbsp;Tamás Solymosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As hydrogen products emerge as a promising energy alternative in multiple sectors, low carbon hydrogen supply chains require concerted efforts among a diverse array of stakeholders. Within an evolving energy transition landscape, stakeholders' competition and cooperation play a critical role in expediting the deployment of the hydrogen economy. In this review, different strategies referred to as <em>Hydrogen Competition, Cooperation, and Coopetition</em> (H2CCC) dynamics are analyzed from the lenses of game theory. The study employs hybrid literature review methodology, integrating both bibliometric and structured review approaches. The study reveals that competition and cooperation represent a contrasting but interconnected dynamics that drive the energy transition. Coopetition models are less common. Furthermore, it is observed that Integrated Energy Systems are mainly used in cooperative and coopetitive approaches while H<sub>2</sub> technologies and Hydrogen Supply Chains are more explored in competitive approaches. Industrial and mobility sectors are present in H2CCC dynamics with technological players more present than institutional entities. Maps, definitions, gaps and perspectives are developed. These insights may be valuable for policymakers, industry stakeholders, modelers, and researchers. There remains a need for further empirical H2CCC case studies and applications of pure coopetitive games.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着氢产品在多个领域成为一种有前景的能源替代品,低碳氢供应链需要不同利益相关者之间的共同努力。在不断发展的能源转型格局中,利益相关者的竞争与合作在加快氢经济的部署方面发挥着关键作用。本文从博弈论的角度分析了氢竞争、合作和合作(H2CCC)动力学的不同策略。本研究采用混合文献综述方法,整合文献计量学和结构化综述方法。研究表明,竞争与合作代表着一种截然不同但又相互关联的动力,推动着能源转型。合作模式就不那么常见了。此外,综合能源系统主要用于合作和合作方式,而氢气技术和氢气供应链则更多地用于竞争方式。在H2CCC动态中,工业和交通部门的技术参与者比机构实体更多。绘制地图、定义、差距和观点。这些见解可能对政策制定者、行业利益相关者、建模者和研究人员有价值。我们还需要进一步的实证H2CCC案例研究和纯合作博弈的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic dynamics in hydrogen deployment: A game-theoretical review of competition, cooperation, and coopetition
As hydrogen products emerge as a promising energy alternative in multiple sectors, low carbon hydrogen supply chains require concerted efforts among a diverse array of stakeholders. Within an evolving energy transition landscape, stakeholders' competition and cooperation play a critical role in expediting the deployment of the hydrogen economy. In this review, different strategies referred to as Hydrogen Competition, Cooperation, and Coopetition (H2CCC) dynamics are analyzed from the lenses of game theory. The study employs hybrid literature review methodology, integrating both bibliometric and structured review approaches. The study reveals that competition and cooperation represent a contrasting but interconnected dynamics that drive the energy transition. Coopetition models are less common. Furthermore, it is observed that Integrated Energy Systems are mainly used in cooperative and coopetitive approaches while H2 technologies and Hydrogen Supply Chains are more explored in competitive approaches. Industrial and mobility sectors are present in H2CCC dynamics with technological players more present than institutional entities. Maps, definitions, gaps and perspectives are developed. These insights may be valuable for policymakers, industry stakeholders, modelers, and researchers. There remains a need for further empirical H2CCC case studies and applications of pure coopetitive games.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信