D. Pukazhselvan , K.S. Sandhya , Duncan Paul Fagg , Frede Blaabjerg
{"title":"清洁交通的未来:氢、电池、氨和绿色甲烷的前景","authors":"D. Pukazhselvan , K.S. Sandhya , Duncan Paul Fagg , Frede Blaabjerg","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid growing efforts to decarbonize the transport sector, this review examines portable energy solutions for clean mobility, focusing on hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, green methane, methanol, biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). We discuss the fundamentals, production routes, storage requirements, and application feasibility of each carrier, alongside recent advancements and persisting challenges. Ammonia, while valued for its favorable storage and carbon-free combustion, faces constraints such as toxicity, indirect carbon emissions, and ammonia slip, though emerging approaches like direct air capture offer promising mitigation pathways. Green methane, ethanol, biodiesel, and SAF are identified as complementary fuels suited for sector-specific deployment, whereas batteries and hydrogen show long-term promise. Cradle-to-Grave emission analyses indicate that battery technologies deliver the lowest overall greenhouse gas footprint among the cleaner energy options, while hydrogen and methanol–gasoline blends also demonstrate notably competitive performance. Cost-per-kilometer analysis indicates the lowest value for methane (0.029 $/km), followed by hydrogen fuel cells integrated with a hydrogen storage material, MgH<sub>2</sub> (0.05–0.055 $/km). Lithium-ion batteries, despite high efficiency, yield moderate cost benefits (0.058 $/km) under our 100 kg energy storage system model, though high-capacity batteries could improve real-world economics. Drawing on literature data and our own assessments, we underscore that the future of clean mobility will not hinge on a single technology, but on a synergistic, multi-fuel strategy integrating the strengths of diverse energy carriers to meet the evolving demands of sustainable transport.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116286"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The future of clean transportation: Hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, and green methane in perspective\",\"authors\":\"D. Pukazhselvan , K.S. Sandhya , Duncan Paul Fagg , Frede Blaabjerg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Amid growing efforts to decarbonize the transport sector, this review examines portable energy solutions for clean mobility, focusing on hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, green methane, methanol, biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). We discuss the fundamentals, production routes, storage requirements, and application feasibility of each carrier, alongside recent advancements and persisting challenges. Ammonia, while valued for its favorable storage and carbon-free combustion, faces constraints such as toxicity, indirect carbon emissions, and ammonia slip, though emerging approaches like direct air capture offer promising mitigation pathways. Green methane, ethanol, biodiesel, and SAF are identified as complementary fuels suited for sector-specific deployment, whereas batteries and hydrogen show long-term promise. Cradle-to-Grave emission analyses indicate that battery technologies deliver the lowest overall greenhouse gas footprint among the cleaner energy options, while hydrogen and methanol–gasoline blends also demonstrate notably competitive performance. Cost-per-kilometer analysis indicates the lowest value for methane (0.029 $/km), followed by hydrogen fuel cells integrated with a hydrogen storage material, MgH<sub>2</sub> (0.05–0.055 $/km). Lithium-ion batteries, despite high efficiency, yield moderate cost benefits (0.058 $/km) under our 100 kg energy storage system model, though high-capacity batteries could improve real-world economics. Drawing on literature data and our own assessments, we underscore that the future of clean mobility will not hinge on a single technology, but on a synergistic, multi-fuel strategy integrating the strengths of diverse energy carriers to meet the evolving demands of sustainable transport.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009591\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009591","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The future of clean transportation: Hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, and green methane in perspective
Amid growing efforts to decarbonize the transport sector, this review examines portable energy solutions for clean mobility, focusing on hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, green methane, methanol, biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). We discuss the fundamentals, production routes, storage requirements, and application feasibility of each carrier, alongside recent advancements and persisting challenges. Ammonia, while valued for its favorable storage and carbon-free combustion, faces constraints such as toxicity, indirect carbon emissions, and ammonia slip, though emerging approaches like direct air capture offer promising mitigation pathways. Green methane, ethanol, biodiesel, and SAF are identified as complementary fuels suited for sector-specific deployment, whereas batteries and hydrogen show long-term promise. Cradle-to-Grave emission analyses indicate that battery technologies deliver the lowest overall greenhouse gas footprint among the cleaner energy options, while hydrogen and methanol–gasoline blends also demonstrate notably competitive performance. Cost-per-kilometer analysis indicates the lowest value for methane (0.029 $/km), followed by hydrogen fuel cells integrated with a hydrogen storage material, MgH2 (0.05–0.055 $/km). Lithium-ion batteries, despite high efficiency, yield moderate cost benefits (0.058 $/km) under our 100 kg energy storage system model, though high-capacity batteries could improve real-world economics. Drawing on literature data and our own assessments, we underscore that the future of clean mobility will not hinge on a single technology, but on a synergistic, multi-fuel strategy integrating the strengths of diverse energy carriers to meet the evolving demands of sustainable transport.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.