清洁交通的未来:氢、电池、氨和绿色甲烷的前景

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
D. Pukazhselvan , K.S. Sandhya , Duncan Paul Fagg , Frede Blaabjerg
{"title":"清洁交通的未来:氢、电池、氨和绿色甲烷的前景","authors":"D. Pukazhselvan ,&nbsp;K.S. Sandhya ,&nbsp;Duncan Paul Fagg ,&nbsp;Frede Blaabjerg","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid growing efforts to decarbonize the transport sector, this review examines portable energy solutions for clean mobility, focusing on hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, green methane, methanol, biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). We discuss the fundamentals, production routes, storage requirements, and application feasibility of each carrier, alongside recent advancements and persisting challenges. Ammonia, while valued for its favorable storage and carbon-free combustion, faces constraints such as toxicity, indirect carbon emissions, and ammonia slip, though emerging approaches like direct air capture offer promising mitigation pathways. Green methane, ethanol, biodiesel, and SAF are identified as complementary fuels suited for sector-specific deployment, whereas batteries and hydrogen show long-term promise. Cradle-to-Grave emission analyses indicate that battery technologies deliver the lowest overall greenhouse gas footprint among the cleaner energy options, while hydrogen and methanol–gasoline blends also demonstrate notably competitive performance. Cost-per-kilometer analysis indicates the lowest value for methane (0.029 $/km), followed by hydrogen fuel cells integrated with a hydrogen storage material, MgH<sub>2</sub> (0.05–0.055 $/km). Lithium-ion batteries, despite high efficiency, yield moderate cost benefits (0.058 $/km) under our 100 kg energy storage system model, though high-capacity batteries could improve real-world economics. Drawing on literature data and our own assessments, we underscore that the future of clean mobility will not hinge on a single technology, but on a synergistic, multi-fuel strategy integrating the strengths of diverse energy carriers to meet the evolving demands of sustainable transport.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116286"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The future of clean transportation: Hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, and green methane in perspective\",\"authors\":\"D. Pukazhselvan ,&nbsp;K.S. Sandhya ,&nbsp;Duncan Paul Fagg ,&nbsp;Frede Blaabjerg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Amid growing efforts to decarbonize the transport sector, this review examines portable energy solutions for clean mobility, focusing on hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, green methane, methanol, biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). We discuss the fundamentals, production routes, storage requirements, and application feasibility of each carrier, alongside recent advancements and persisting challenges. Ammonia, while valued for its favorable storage and carbon-free combustion, faces constraints such as toxicity, indirect carbon emissions, and ammonia slip, though emerging approaches like direct air capture offer promising mitigation pathways. Green methane, ethanol, biodiesel, and SAF are identified as complementary fuels suited for sector-specific deployment, whereas batteries and hydrogen show long-term promise. Cradle-to-Grave emission analyses indicate that battery technologies deliver the lowest overall greenhouse gas footprint among the cleaner energy options, while hydrogen and methanol–gasoline blends also demonstrate notably competitive performance. Cost-per-kilometer analysis indicates the lowest value for methane (0.029 $/km), followed by hydrogen fuel cells integrated with a hydrogen storage material, MgH<sub>2</sub> (0.05–0.055 $/km). Lithium-ion batteries, despite high efficiency, yield moderate cost benefits (0.058 $/km) under our 100 kg energy storage system model, though high-capacity batteries could improve real-world economics. Drawing on literature data and our own assessments, we underscore that the future of clean mobility will not hinge on a single technology, but on a synergistic, multi-fuel strategy integrating the strengths of diverse energy carriers to meet the evolving demands of sustainable transport.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009591\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009591","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在运输部门不断努力脱碳的背景下,本综述探讨了清洁交通的便携式能源解决方案,重点是氢、电池、氨、绿色甲烷、甲醇、生物柴油和可持续航空燃料(SAF)。我们将讨论每种载体的基本原理、生产路线、存储要求和应用可行性,以及最近的进展和持续的挑战。氨虽然因其有利的储存和无碳燃烧而受到重视,但也面临着诸如毒性、间接碳排放和氨泄漏等限制,尽管直接空气捕获等新兴方法提供了有希望的缓解途径。绿色甲烷、乙醇、生物柴油和SAF被认为是适合特定行业部署的补充燃料,而电池和氢则显示出长期的前景。从摇篮到坟墓的排放分析表明,在清洁能源选择中,电池技术的温室气体排放总量最低,而氢气和甲醇-汽油混合物也表现出显著的竞争力。每公里成本分析显示,甲烷的成本最低(0.029美元/公里),其次是与储氢材料MgH2集成的氢燃料电池(0.05-0.055美元/公里)。尽管锂离子电池效率很高,但在我们的100公斤储能系统模型下,成本效益适中(0.058美元/公里),尽管大容量电池可以提高现实世界的经济效益。根据文献数据和我们自己的评估,我们强调,清洁交通的未来将不取决于单一技术,而是取决于一种协同的多燃料战略,整合各种能源载体的优势,以满足不断变化的可持续交通需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The future of clean transportation: Hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, and green methane in perspective
Amid growing efforts to decarbonize the transport sector, this review examines portable energy solutions for clean mobility, focusing on hydrogen, batteries, ammonia, green methane, methanol, biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). We discuss the fundamentals, production routes, storage requirements, and application feasibility of each carrier, alongside recent advancements and persisting challenges. Ammonia, while valued for its favorable storage and carbon-free combustion, faces constraints such as toxicity, indirect carbon emissions, and ammonia slip, though emerging approaches like direct air capture offer promising mitigation pathways. Green methane, ethanol, biodiesel, and SAF are identified as complementary fuels suited for sector-specific deployment, whereas batteries and hydrogen show long-term promise. Cradle-to-Grave emission analyses indicate that battery technologies deliver the lowest overall greenhouse gas footprint among the cleaner energy options, while hydrogen and methanol–gasoline blends also demonstrate notably competitive performance. Cost-per-kilometer analysis indicates the lowest value for methane (0.029 $/km), followed by hydrogen fuel cells integrated with a hydrogen storage material, MgH2 (0.05–0.055 $/km). Lithium-ion batteries, despite high efficiency, yield moderate cost benefits (0.058 $/km) under our 100 kg energy storage system model, though high-capacity batteries could improve real-world economics. Drawing on literature data and our own assessments, we underscore that the future of clean mobility will not hinge on a single technology, but on a synergistic, multi-fuel strategy integrating the strengths of diverse energy carriers to meet the evolving demands of sustainable transport.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信