Angel X. Xiao MD, MSE , Brian Chen BS , Christopher Chiong BA , Nicholas H. Lee , Igor Immerman MD , Sakura Kinjo MD
{"title":"数字剂量:虚拟现实用于手部手术患者围手术期疼痛和焦虑","authors":"Angel X. Xiao MD, MSE , Brian Chen BS , Christopher Chiong BA , Nicholas H. Lee , Igor Immerman MD , Sakura Kinjo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly recognized as a complementary tool to address pain and anxiety. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of VR for the management of pain and anxiety in patients undergoing minor hand surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing outpatient hand surgery were randomized to VR or control groups. In addition to the standard anesthetic protocol, the VR group received a VR experience as part of their preoperative care. Patient anxiety and pain scores were collected using the Numerical Visual Analog Anxiety Scale and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively. In addition, we recorded changes in patient hemodynamics and any additional medication doses required to manage pain or anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-one patients (21 VR and 20 control) were enrolled. There were no differences in reported pain or anxiety scores before, during, or after surgery. There was no difference in vital signs or recovery times. Patients in the VR groups received less additional midazolam (0.4 mg vs 1.2 mg) and fentanyl (10 mcg vs 27.4 mcg) compared with patients in the control group. In a multivariable model, VR use remained the only significant predictor for no required midazolam. Eighty-five percent of patients believed that the use of VR positively impacted their surgical experience. As a result of the VR experience, 78% believed that their anxiety decreased and 61.1% believed that their pain decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although patient pain and anxiety levels between the VR and non-VR groups were similar, the VR group required significantly less midazolam and fentanyl. Moreover, VR use was the only predictor of not requiring midazolam administration during surgery. Patient satisfaction was high with VR usage. VR implementation during minor hand surgery is a viable option to improve patient experience.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/Level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IIB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Doses: Virtual Reality Use for Perioperative Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Angel X. Xiao MD, MSE , Brian Chen BS , Christopher Chiong BA , Nicholas H. Lee , Igor Immerman MD , Sakura Kinjo MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly recognized as a complementary tool to address pain and anxiety. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of VR for the management of pain and anxiety in patients undergoing minor hand surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing outpatient hand surgery were randomized to VR or control groups. In addition to the standard anesthetic protocol, the VR group received a VR experience as part of their preoperative care. Patient anxiety and pain scores were collected using the Numerical Visual Analog Anxiety Scale and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively. In addition, we recorded changes in patient hemodynamics and any additional medication doses required to manage pain or anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-one patients (21 VR and 20 control) were enrolled. There were no differences in reported pain or anxiety scores before, during, or after surgery. There was no difference in vital signs or recovery times. Patients in the VR groups received less additional midazolam (0.4 mg vs 1.2 mg) and fentanyl (10 mcg vs 27.4 mcg) compared with patients in the control group. In a multivariable model, VR use remained the only significant predictor for no required midazolam. Eighty-five percent of patients believed that the use of VR positively impacted their surgical experience. As a result of the VR experience, 78% believed that their anxiety decreased and 61.1% believed that their pain decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although patient pain and anxiety levels between the VR and non-VR groups were similar, the VR group required significantly less midazolam and fentanyl. Moreover, VR use was the only predictor of not requiring midazolam administration during surgery. Patient satisfaction was high with VR usage. VR implementation during minor hand surgery is a viable option to improve patient experience.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/Level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IIB.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125001501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125001501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的虚拟现实(VR)越来越被认为是解决疼痛和焦虑的辅助工具。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估VR治疗手部小手术患者疼痛和焦虑的有效性。方法门诊手部手术患者随机分为VR组和对照组。除了标准麻醉方案外,VR组还接受了VR体验作为术前护理的一部分。分别使用数值视觉模拟焦虑量表和数值评定量表收集患者焦虑和疼痛评分。此外,我们还记录了患者血流动力学的变化以及控制疼痛或焦虑所需的任何额外药物剂量。结果共纳入41例患者,其中虚拟现实患者21例,对照组20例。在手术前、手术中或手术后报告的疼痛或焦虑评分没有差异。两组在生命体征和恢复时间上没有差异。与对照组患者相比,VR组患者额外接受的咪达唑仑(0.4 mg vs 1.2 mg)和芬太尼(10 mcg vs 27.4 mcg)较少。在多变量模型中,VR使用仍然是不需要咪达唑仑的唯一重要预测因素。85%的患者认为VR的使用对他们的手术体验产生了积极的影响。由于VR体验,78%的人认为他们的焦虑减轻了,61.1%的人认为他们的疼痛减轻了。结论虽然VR组和非VR组患者的疼痛和焦虑水平相似,但VR组对咪达唑仑和芬太尼的需求明显减少。此外,VR的使用是手术期间不需要咪达唑仑的唯一预测因素。患者对VR的使用满意度很高。在小手手术中实施虚拟现实技术是改善患者体验的可行选择。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IIB。
Digital Doses: Virtual Reality Use for Perioperative Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery
Purpose
Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly recognized as a complementary tool to address pain and anxiety. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of VR for the management of pain and anxiety in patients undergoing minor hand surgery.
Methods
Patients undergoing outpatient hand surgery were randomized to VR or control groups. In addition to the standard anesthetic protocol, the VR group received a VR experience as part of their preoperative care. Patient anxiety and pain scores were collected using the Numerical Visual Analog Anxiety Scale and Numerical Rating Scale, respectively. In addition, we recorded changes in patient hemodynamics and any additional medication doses required to manage pain or anxiety.
Results
Forty-one patients (21 VR and 20 control) were enrolled. There were no differences in reported pain or anxiety scores before, during, or after surgery. There was no difference in vital signs or recovery times. Patients in the VR groups received less additional midazolam (0.4 mg vs 1.2 mg) and fentanyl (10 mcg vs 27.4 mcg) compared with patients in the control group. In a multivariable model, VR use remained the only significant predictor for no required midazolam. Eighty-five percent of patients believed that the use of VR positively impacted their surgical experience. As a result of the VR experience, 78% believed that their anxiety decreased and 61.1% believed that their pain decreased.
Conclusions
Although patient pain and anxiety levels between the VR and non-VR groups were similar, the VR group required significantly less midazolam and fentanyl. Moreover, VR use was the only predictor of not requiring midazolam administration during surgery. Patient satisfaction was high with VR usage. VR implementation during minor hand surgery is a viable option to improve patient experience.