全球145个地区100%可再生能源系统年际储能与产能过剩的技术经济分析

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mohammad Hasibul Hasan , Dominik Keiner , Christian Breyer
{"title":"全球145个地区100%可再生能源系统年际储能与产能过剩的技术经济分析","authors":"Mohammad Hasibul Hasan ,&nbsp;Dominik Keiner ,&nbsp;Christian Breyer","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, a comprehensive analysis of inter-annual storage requirements for 100% renewable energy systems is presented for the world, structured in 145 regions. This research provides the first global assessment of solar and wind resources on multiple sectors, including power, heat, transport, and desalination. Inter-annual storage options include hydrogen, methane, and liquid fuels. Using high-resolution weather data from NASA from 1984 to 2005, storage requirements, overcapacity for renewable electricity generation, and economic implications across different regions are analysed. The results reveal substantial regional variations in storage requirements, with hydrogen re-electrification systems showing the widest range of storage needs across different global regions. Cost analyses for two scenarios are presented to minimise either curtailment or cost. The study reveals that optimal storage solutions are highly region and demand-specific, challenging the one-size-fits-all approach often assumed in energy system planning. The curtailment-optimised scenario requires 1.4% overcapacity in wind and solar photovoltaics electricity generation, complemented by significant storage capacity of 417.4 TWh<sub>H2,LHV</sub>, 0.8 TWh<sub>CH4,LHV</sub>, and 4.2 TWh<sub>th,LHV</sub> of hydrogen, methane, and liquid fuels, respectively, adding an on demand-weighted average of 103.1% to the baseline cost of a 100% renewable energy system in 2050. In contrast, the cost-optimised scenario requires 5.0% generation overcapacity with no additional inter-annual storage, increasing costs by 3.3%. This core finding reveals that increasing the overcapacity is a significantly more impactful and economically viable pathway than a primary reliance on building large-scale storage. These findings provide crucial insights for policymakers and system planners working towards the resilience of 100% renewable energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"401 ","pages":"Article 126736"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic analysis of inter-annual energy storage and overcapacity in 100 % renewable energy systems for 145 regions globally\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hasibul Hasan ,&nbsp;Dominik Keiner ,&nbsp;Christian Breyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, a comprehensive analysis of inter-annual storage requirements for 100% renewable energy systems is presented for the world, structured in 145 regions. This research provides the first global assessment of solar and wind resources on multiple sectors, including power, heat, transport, and desalination. Inter-annual storage options include hydrogen, methane, and liquid fuels. Using high-resolution weather data from NASA from 1984 to 2005, storage requirements, overcapacity for renewable electricity generation, and economic implications across different regions are analysed. The results reveal substantial regional variations in storage requirements, with hydrogen re-electrification systems showing the widest range of storage needs across different global regions. Cost analyses for two scenarios are presented to minimise either curtailment or cost. The study reveals that optimal storage solutions are highly region and demand-specific, challenging the one-size-fits-all approach often assumed in energy system planning. The curtailment-optimised scenario requires 1.4% overcapacity in wind and solar photovoltaics electricity generation, complemented by significant storage capacity of 417.4 TWh<sub>H2,LHV</sub>, 0.8 TWh<sub>CH4,LHV</sub>, and 4.2 TWh<sub>th,LHV</sub> of hydrogen, methane, and liquid fuels, respectively, adding an on demand-weighted average of 103.1% to the baseline cost of a 100% renewable energy system in 2050. In contrast, the cost-optimised scenario requires 5.0% generation overcapacity with no additional inter-annual storage, increasing costs by 3.3%. This core finding reveals that increasing the overcapacity is a significantly more impactful and economically viable pathway than a primary reliance on building large-scale storage. These findings provide crucial insights for policymakers and system planners working towards the resilience of 100% renewable energy systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"401 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014667\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,对全球145个地区100%可再生能源系统的年际存储需求进行了全面分析。这项研究首次对太阳能和风能资源在多个领域的应用进行了全球评估,包括电力、热能、运输和海水淡化。年际储存方案包括氢、甲烷和液体燃料。利用美国国家航空航天局1984年至2005年的高分辨率天气数据,分析了不同地区的存储需求、可再生能源发电的产能过剩以及经济影响。研究结果揭示了储存需求的巨大区域差异,氢再电气化系统在全球不同地区显示出最广泛的储存需求。提出了两种方案的成本分析,以尽量减少削减或成本。研究表明,最佳的储能解决方案是高度区域性和需求特异性的,挑战了能源系统规划中通常假设的一刀切方法。弃风优化方案要求风能和太阳能光伏发电产能过剩1.4%,并辅以氢、甲烷和液体燃料的储能容量,分别为417.4太瓦时、0.8太瓦时和4.2太瓦时,到2050年,100%可再生能源系统的基线成本将增加103.1%的按需加权平均成本。相比之下,成本优化方案需要5.0%的发电产能过剩,没有额外的年际存储,成本增加3.3%。这一核心发现表明,增加产能过剩是一种比主要依赖大规模存储更有效、更经济可行的途径。这些发现为致力于实现100%可再生能源系统弹性的政策制定者和系统规划者提供了至关重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-economic analysis of inter-annual energy storage and overcapacity in 100 % renewable energy systems for 145 regions globally
In this study, a comprehensive analysis of inter-annual storage requirements for 100% renewable energy systems is presented for the world, structured in 145 regions. This research provides the first global assessment of solar and wind resources on multiple sectors, including power, heat, transport, and desalination. Inter-annual storage options include hydrogen, methane, and liquid fuels. Using high-resolution weather data from NASA from 1984 to 2005, storage requirements, overcapacity for renewable electricity generation, and economic implications across different regions are analysed. The results reveal substantial regional variations in storage requirements, with hydrogen re-electrification systems showing the widest range of storage needs across different global regions. Cost analyses for two scenarios are presented to minimise either curtailment or cost. The study reveals that optimal storage solutions are highly region and demand-specific, challenging the one-size-fits-all approach often assumed in energy system planning. The curtailment-optimised scenario requires 1.4% overcapacity in wind and solar photovoltaics electricity generation, complemented by significant storage capacity of 417.4 TWhH2,LHV, 0.8 TWhCH4,LHV, and 4.2 TWhth,LHV of hydrogen, methane, and liquid fuels, respectively, adding an on demand-weighted average of 103.1% to the baseline cost of a 100% renewable energy system in 2050. In contrast, the cost-optimised scenario requires 5.0% generation overcapacity with no additional inter-annual storage, increasing costs by 3.3%. This core finding reveals that increasing the overcapacity is a significantly more impactful and economically viable pathway than a primary reliance on building large-scale storage. These findings provide crucial insights for policymakers and system planners working towards the resilience of 100% renewable energy systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信