何时何地起作用:增强电动汽车充电的需求响应

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ahmed S.M. Sobhy , Desy Caesary , Hana Kim , Jiyong Eom
{"title":"何时何地起作用:增强电动汽车充电的需求响应","authors":"Ahmed S.M. Sobhy ,&nbsp;Desy Caesary ,&nbsp;Hana Kim ,&nbsp;Jiyong Eom","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) offer a promising solution for mitigating the intermittency of renewable energy through flexible charging. Demand Response (DR) has been tested as one of the key demand-side solutions to capture the flexibility potential of EVs in Korea. This study evaluates the effects of DR interventions focusing on temporal factors and station-level characteristics that are often overlooked in existing literature. Using panel data from 558 EV charging stations (EVCSs) in Korea that participated in the DR program (November 9, 2022–April 30, 2023), we develop a CatBoost-based predictive model to estimate counterfactual consumption and isolate DR impacts at the station level. Results show that EVCSs with automatic controls achieve an average reduction of 11.8 % during event hours, while manual adjustments in charging patterns yield only a 0.4 % reduction, underscoring the limitations of voluntary user compliance. Moderately visited EVCSs exhibit the largest reductions in load, suggesting that station-level characteristics such as occupancy rate play a crucial role in DR effectiveness. Analysis reveals that stations with occupancy rates between 25 % and 63 % demonstrate the most substantial consumption reductions, indicating an optimal operational range for DR program effectiveness. DR interventions were the most effective during evening hours for EVCSs with automatic controls, whereas manual adjustments showed no significant variation by time. In addition, intervention effects during the evening hours differ across seasons. These findings provide insights for the development of DR programs that consider temporal variations and imply the need for automation of EVCSs to enhance grid flexibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"401 ","pages":"Article 126739"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When and where it counts: enhancing demand response in electric vehicle charging\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed S.M. Sobhy ,&nbsp;Desy Caesary ,&nbsp;Hana Kim ,&nbsp;Jiyong Eom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) offer a promising solution for mitigating the intermittency of renewable energy through flexible charging. Demand Response (DR) has been tested as one of the key demand-side solutions to capture the flexibility potential of EVs in Korea. This study evaluates the effects of DR interventions focusing on temporal factors and station-level characteristics that are often overlooked in existing literature. Using panel data from 558 EV charging stations (EVCSs) in Korea that participated in the DR program (November 9, 2022–April 30, 2023), we develop a CatBoost-based predictive model to estimate counterfactual consumption and isolate DR impacts at the station level. Results show that EVCSs with automatic controls achieve an average reduction of 11.8 % during event hours, while manual adjustments in charging patterns yield only a 0.4 % reduction, underscoring the limitations of voluntary user compliance. Moderately visited EVCSs exhibit the largest reductions in load, suggesting that station-level characteristics such as occupancy rate play a crucial role in DR effectiveness. Analysis reveals that stations with occupancy rates between 25 % and 63 % demonstrate the most substantial consumption reductions, indicating an optimal operational range for DR program effectiveness. DR interventions were the most effective during evening hours for EVCSs with automatic controls, whereas manual adjustments showed no significant variation by time. In addition, intervention effects during the evening hours differ across seasons. These findings provide insights for the development of DR programs that consider temporal variations and imply the need for automation of EVCSs to enhance grid flexibility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"401 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014692\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014692","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电动汽车(ev)通过灵活充电为缓解可再生能源的间歇性提供了一个很有前途的解决方案。在韩国,需求响应(DR)已被证明是捕捉电动汽车灵活性潜力的关键需求侧解决方案之一。本研究评估了DR干预措施的效果,重点关注时间因素和台站水平特征,这些在现有文献中经常被忽视。利用参与DR项目(2022年11月9日至2023年4月30日)的韩国558个电动汽车充电站(evcs)的面板数据,我们开发了一个基于catboost的预测模型来估计反事实消耗,并在充电站层面隔离DR影响。结果表明,自动控制的电动汽车在活动时间内平均减少11.8%,而手动调整充电模式仅减少0.4%,强调了用户自愿遵守的局限性。适度访问的evcs表现出最大的负荷减少,这表明站级特征(如入住率)在DR有效性中起着至关重要的作用。分析显示,入住率在25%到63%之间的车站显示出最显著的消耗减少,这表明了DR计划有效性的最佳运行范围。对于自动控制的evcs, DR干预在夜间最有效,而手动调节在时间上没有显着变化。此外,夜间干预的效果因季节而异。这些发现为考虑时间变化的DR计划的发展提供了见解,并暗示了evcs自动化以增强电网灵活性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When and where it counts: enhancing demand response in electric vehicle charging
Electric vehicles (EVs) offer a promising solution for mitigating the intermittency of renewable energy through flexible charging. Demand Response (DR) has been tested as one of the key demand-side solutions to capture the flexibility potential of EVs in Korea. This study evaluates the effects of DR interventions focusing on temporal factors and station-level characteristics that are often overlooked in existing literature. Using panel data from 558 EV charging stations (EVCSs) in Korea that participated in the DR program (November 9, 2022–April 30, 2023), we develop a CatBoost-based predictive model to estimate counterfactual consumption and isolate DR impacts at the station level. Results show that EVCSs with automatic controls achieve an average reduction of 11.8 % during event hours, while manual adjustments in charging patterns yield only a 0.4 % reduction, underscoring the limitations of voluntary user compliance. Moderately visited EVCSs exhibit the largest reductions in load, suggesting that station-level characteristics such as occupancy rate play a crucial role in DR effectiveness. Analysis reveals that stations with occupancy rates between 25 % and 63 % demonstrate the most substantial consumption reductions, indicating an optimal operational range for DR program effectiveness. DR interventions were the most effective during evening hours for EVCSs with automatic controls, whereas manual adjustments showed no significant variation by time. In addition, intervention effects during the evening hours differ across seasons. These findings provide insights for the development of DR programs that consider temporal variations and imply the need for automation of EVCSs to enhance grid flexibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信