Vincenzo E. Di Bacco , Zaryan Masood , Joshua A.J. Keogh , Matthew C. Ruder , Fatima Gafoor , Jenny Wu , Yalda Azari , Eseoghene Orogun , Dylan Kobsar
{"title":"定义和测量膝骨关节炎的内翻推力:对当前证据和挑战的范围审查","authors":"Vincenzo E. Di Bacco , Zaryan Masood , Joshua A.J. Keogh , Matthew C. Ruder , Fatima Gafoor , Jenny Wu , Yalda Azari , Eseoghene Orogun , Dylan Kobsar","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review investigated the definitions, assessment methods, and current applications of varus thrust (VT) in knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched in this scoping review for studies assessing VT during walking in adults with knee OA using the terms “varus” and “lateral” in proximity to thrust. Data were extracted and categorized by study characteristics (OA sample, publication year, design, and aim) and VT assessment protocol (method and definition).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 63 studies were included, examining 12,569 individuals with knee OA using visual (<em>n</em> = 24), optical motion capture (<em>n</em> = 27), or inertial/wearable sensor (<em>n</em> = 19) methods. Designs included prospective, experimental, cross-sectional, and case series. VT was most often assessed to examine disease severity, progression, surgical outcomes, and symptom associations. Visual VT was commonly defined as dynamic worsening or abrupt onset of varus alignment during weight acceptance. Optical motion capture commonly measured VT as frontal plane knee excursion from foot contact to mid-stance, while inertial methods typically used peak lateral tibial acceleration or angular velocity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite growing research interest in VT, inconsistent definitions and measurement protocols limit comparability across studies and hinder broader adoption. Greater standardization and validation are needed to clarify its potential clinical utility in knee OA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining and measuring varus thrust in knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review of current evidence and challenges\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo E. Di Bacco , Zaryan Masood , Joshua A.J. Keogh , Matthew C. Ruder , Fatima Gafoor , Jenny Wu , Yalda Azari , Eseoghene Orogun , Dylan Kobsar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review investigated the definitions, assessment methods, and current applications of varus thrust (VT) in knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched in this scoping review for studies assessing VT during walking in adults with knee OA using the terms “varus” and “lateral” in proximity to thrust. Data were extracted and categorized by study characteristics (OA sample, publication year, design, and aim) and VT assessment protocol (method and definition).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 63 studies were included, examining 12,569 individuals with knee OA using visual (<em>n</em> = 24), optical motion capture (<em>n</em> = 27), or inertial/wearable sensor (<em>n</em> = 19) methods. Designs included prospective, experimental, cross-sectional, and case series. VT was most often assessed to examine disease severity, progression, surgical outcomes, and symptom associations. Visual VT was commonly defined as dynamic worsening or abrupt onset of varus alignment during weight acceptance. Optical motion capture commonly measured VT as frontal plane knee excursion from foot contact to mid-stance, while inertial methods typically used peak lateral tibial acceleration or angular velocity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite growing research interest in VT, inconsistent definitions and measurement protocols limit comparability across studies and hinder broader adoption. Greater standardization and validation are needed to clarify its potential clinical utility in knee OA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125001190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125001190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defining and measuring varus thrust in knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review of current evidence and challenges
Objective
This scoping review investigated the definitions, assessment methods, and current applications of varus thrust (VT) in knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Methods
Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched in this scoping review for studies assessing VT during walking in adults with knee OA using the terms “varus” and “lateral” in proximity to thrust. Data were extracted and categorized by study characteristics (OA sample, publication year, design, and aim) and VT assessment protocol (method and definition).
Results
A total of 63 studies were included, examining 12,569 individuals with knee OA using visual (n = 24), optical motion capture (n = 27), or inertial/wearable sensor (n = 19) methods. Designs included prospective, experimental, cross-sectional, and case series. VT was most often assessed to examine disease severity, progression, surgical outcomes, and symptom associations. Visual VT was commonly defined as dynamic worsening or abrupt onset of varus alignment during weight acceptance. Optical motion capture commonly measured VT as frontal plane knee excursion from foot contact to mid-stance, while inertial methods typically used peak lateral tibial acceleration or angular velocity.
Conclusion
Despite growing research interest in VT, inconsistent definitions and measurement protocols limit comparability across studies and hinder broader adoption. Greater standardization and validation are needed to clarify its potential clinical utility in knee OA.