美国国立卫生研究院aarp饮食与健康研究中肉类消费与结直肠癌发病率解剖亚位的关系

IF 3.2 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sémi Zouiouich , David Wahl , Linda M Liao, Barry I Graubard, Hyokyoung G Hong, Erikka Loftfield, Rashmi Sinha
{"title":"美国国立卫生研究院aarp饮食与健康研究中肉类消费与结直肠癌发病率解剖亚位的关系","authors":"Sémi Zouiouich ,&nbsp;David Wahl ,&nbsp;Linda M Liao,&nbsp;Barry I Graubard,&nbsp;Hyokyoung G Hong,&nbsp;Erikka Loftfield,&nbsp;Rashmi Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the literature, the consumption of red and processed meat is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. It still remains unclear whether the associations of different types of meat intake with CRC vary by subsite of the colorectum.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We investigated the association of red, white, and processed meat intakes with CRC incidence across anatomical subsites of the colon and rectum.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 454,505 cancer-free adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. During 6,896,619 person-years of follow-up, 9,461 CRC cases were diagnosed. Type and amount of meat consumed were assessed via food frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations of meat intake, by type, with CRC for an estimated fixed-unit measure of 50 g/1000 kcal, applying both a substitution and addition approach. The substitution model estimated the effect of replacing a given meat type with another type while keeping total meat constant. The addition model evaluated the independent effects of each meat type, keeping all other individual meat types, but not total meat, constant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Replacing 50 g/1000 kcal of white meat with red meat was associated with 21% higher CRC incidence. Higher incidence was also observed for proximal colon (16%), distal colon (25%), and rectal (30%) cancers, driven by positive associations in the cecum (19%), transverse colon (32%), sigmoid colon (28%), and rectosigmoid junction (65%). Every 50 g/1000 kcal of red meat intake was independently associated with higher CRC incidence in the proximal colon (11%), distal colon (22%), and rectum (19%). However, white meat was only associated with a lower incidence when replacing red meat. Replacing unprocessed with processed meat intake was associated with higher CRC incidence overall (15%), namely in the proximal colon (18%) and the cecum (33%). Processed meat intake was also independently associated with higher CRC incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that replacing white meat with red meat was associated with higher CRC incidence. The lack of independent inverse associations for white meat intake indicates that lower CRC incidence is derived from lower red meat intake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 107540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meat Consumption in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Anatomical Subsites in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study\",\"authors\":\"Sémi Zouiouich ,&nbsp;David Wahl ,&nbsp;Linda M Liao,&nbsp;Barry I Graubard,&nbsp;Hyokyoung G Hong,&nbsp;Erikka Loftfield,&nbsp;Rashmi Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the literature, the consumption of red and processed meat is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. It still remains unclear whether the associations of different types of meat intake with CRC vary by subsite of the colorectum.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We investigated the association of red, white, and processed meat intakes with CRC incidence across anatomical subsites of the colon and rectum.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 454,505 cancer-free adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. During 6,896,619 person-years of follow-up, 9,461 CRC cases were diagnosed. Type and amount of meat consumed were assessed via food frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations of meat intake, by type, with CRC for an estimated fixed-unit measure of 50 g/1000 kcal, applying both a substitution and addition approach. The substitution model estimated the effect of replacing a given meat type with another type while keeping total meat constant. The addition model evaluated the independent effects of each meat type, keeping all other individual meat types, but not total meat, constant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Replacing 50 g/1000 kcal of white meat with red meat was associated with 21% higher CRC incidence. Higher incidence was also observed for proximal colon (16%), distal colon (25%), and rectal (30%) cancers, driven by positive associations in the cecum (19%), transverse colon (32%), sigmoid colon (28%), and rectosigmoid junction (65%). Every 50 g/1000 kcal of red meat intake was independently associated with higher CRC incidence in the proximal colon (11%), distal colon (22%), and rectum (19%). However, white meat was only associated with a lower incidence when replacing red meat. Replacing unprocessed with processed meat intake was associated with higher CRC incidence overall (15%), namely in the proximal colon (18%) and the cecum (33%). Processed meat intake was also independently associated with higher CRC incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that replacing white meat with red meat was associated with higher CRC incidence. The lack of independent inverse associations for white meat intake indicates that lower CRC incidence is derived from lower red meat intake.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 107540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125030021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125030021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文献中,食用红肉和加工肉与结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率有关。目前尚不清楚不同类型的肉类摄入与结直肠癌的关系是否因结直肠亚区而异。目的研究红肉、白肉和加工肉摄入量与结肠和直肠解剖亚位结直肠癌发病率的关系。方法:我们分析了来自美国国立卫生研究院aarp饮食与健康研究队列的454,505名无癌成年人的数据。在6896619人年的随访中,9461例结直肠癌被确诊。通过食物频率问卷对肉类的种类和数量进行评估。Cox比例风险模型用于估计肉类摄入类型与CRC的关联,估计固定单位测量为50 g/1000 kcal,同时采用替代和添加方法。替代模型估计了在保持肉类总量不变的情况下,用另一种肉类替代一种特定肉类的效果。添加模型评估了每种肉类类型的独立效应,保持所有其他单个肉类类型不变,但不保持总肉类不变。结果用红肉代替50 g/1000 kcal的白肉可使结直肠癌发病率提高21%。近端结肠(16%)、远端结肠(25%)和直肠(30%)癌症的发病率也较高,盲肠(19%)、横结肠(32%)、乙状结肠(28%)和直肠-乙状结肠交界处(65%)的正相关。每摄入50克/1000千卡的红肉与近端结肠(11%)、远端结肠(22%)和直肠(19%)较高的结直肠癌发病率独立相关。然而,当取代红肉时,白肉的发病率较低。用加工肉类替代未加工肉类的摄入,总体上CRC发病率更高(15%),即近端结肠(18%)和盲肠(33%)。加工肉类的摄入也与较高的结直肠癌发病率独立相关。结论我们发现用红肉代替白肉与更高的CRC发病率相关。白肉摄入量缺乏独立的负相关表明,较低的CRC发病率源于较低的红肉摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meat Consumption in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Anatomical Subsites in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study

Background

In the literature, the consumption of red and processed meat is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. It still remains unclear whether the associations of different types of meat intake with CRC vary by subsite of the colorectum.

Objectives

We investigated the association of red, white, and processed meat intakes with CRC incidence across anatomical subsites of the colon and rectum.

Methods

We analyzed data from 454,505 cancer-free adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. During 6,896,619 person-years of follow-up, 9,461 CRC cases were diagnosed. Type and amount of meat consumed were assessed via food frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations of meat intake, by type, with CRC for an estimated fixed-unit measure of 50 g/1000 kcal, applying both a substitution and addition approach. The substitution model estimated the effect of replacing a given meat type with another type while keeping total meat constant. The addition model evaluated the independent effects of each meat type, keeping all other individual meat types, but not total meat, constant.

Results

Replacing 50 g/1000 kcal of white meat with red meat was associated with 21% higher CRC incidence. Higher incidence was also observed for proximal colon (16%), distal colon (25%), and rectal (30%) cancers, driven by positive associations in the cecum (19%), transverse colon (32%), sigmoid colon (28%), and rectosigmoid junction (65%). Every 50 g/1000 kcal of red meat intake was independently associated with higher CRC incidence in the proximal colon (11%), distal colon (22%), and rectum (19%). However, white meat was only associated with a lower incidence when replacing red meat. Replacing unprocessed with processed meat intake was associated with higher CRC incidence overall (15%), namely in the proximal colon (18%) and the cecum (33%). Processed meat intake was also independently associated with higher CRC incidence.

Conclusions

We found that replacing white meat with red meat was associated with higher CRC incidence. The lack of independent inverse associations for white meat intake indicates that lower CRC incidence is derived from lower red meat intake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信