心脏康复对心力衰竭二级预防的益处:文献综述

IF 5.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ifunanyachukwu Okwuosa M.D.
{"title":"心脏康复对心力衰竭二级预防的益处:文献综述","authors":"Ifunanyachukwu Okwuosa M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Heart Failure</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately 6.7 million adults in the U.S. have a diagnosis of heart failure, with a projected prevalence of 11.4 million by 2050. These individuals experience a significant decrease in quality of life and frequent hospitalizations for acute cardiac decompensation. There is also an evident economic burden on the healthcare system due to these high rates of hospitalizations. Cardiac rehabilitation, a multidisciplinary intervention, is well-established for post-coronary revascularization procedures but remains underutilized for heart failure patients. This review evaluates its benefits based on recent U.S. based randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed to identify relevant RCTs carried out in the US and published in English between January 2020 to February 2025. The search strategy included keywords: “cardiac rehabilitation”, “exercise”, “physical activity”, “heart failure”, “HFrEF”, “HFpEF”, “congestive heart failure”, “chronic heart failure”, and “CHF”. Only studies involving adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) were included. Six studies, which directly measured the effects of cardiac rehab on patients with heart failure, were selected for this literature review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved exercise capacity, peak VO2, leg strength, and quality of life compared to usual care. Reductions in arterial stiffness, myocardial stiffness, and left ventricular mass were observed. Interventions lasted 12 weeks to 1 year, with high-intensity and resistance exercises yielding better outcomes than moderate-intensity workouts. However, no significant difference was found in 6-month rehospitalization or mortality rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cardiac rehabilitation enhances exercise tolerance and quality of life in heart failure patients, though mortality and hospitalization rates remain unchanged. Future research should explore its direct economic impact on both patients and the healthcare system and the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation across different stages of heart failure. Integrating cardiac rehab referrals into post-discharge and outpatient workflow may optimize heart failure patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101118"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BENEFITS OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION IN HEART FAILURE: A LITERATURE REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Ifunanyachukwu Okwuosa M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Heart Failure</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately 6.7 million adults in the U.S. have a diagnosis of heart failure, with a projected prevalence of 11.4 million by 2050. These individuals experience a significant decrease in quality of life and frequent hospitalizations for acute cardiac decompensation. There is also an evident economic burden on the healthcare system due to these high rates of hospitalizations. Cardiac rehabilitation, a multidisciplinary intervention, is well-established for post-coronary revascularization procedures but remains underutilized for heart failure patients. This review evaluates its benefits based on recent U.S. based randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed to identify relevant RCTs carried out in the US and published in English between January 2020 to February 2025. The search strategy included keywords: “cardiac rehabilitation”, “exercise”, “physical activity”, “heart failure”, “HFrEF”, “HFpEF”, “congestive heart failure”, “chronic heart failure”, and “CHF”. Only studies involving adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) were included. Six studies, which directly measured the effects of cardiac rehab on patients with heart failure, were selected for this literature review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved exercise capacity, peak VO2, leg strength, and quality of life compared to usual care. Reductions in arterial stiffness, myocardial stiffness, and left ventricular mass were observed. Interventions lasted 12 weeks to 1 year, with high-intensity and resistance exercises yielding better outcomes than moderate-intensity workouts. However, no significant difference was found in 6-month rehospitalization or mortality rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cardiac rehabilitation enhances exercise tolerance and quality of life in heart failure patients, though mortality and hospitalization rates remain unchanged. Future research should explore its direct economic impact on both patients and the healthcare system and the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation across different stages of heart failure. Integrating cardiac rehab referrals into post-discharge and outpatient workflow may optimize heart failure patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772500193X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772500193X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗领域心衰背景在美国大约有670万成年人被诊断为心衰,预计到2050年将达到1140万。这些人的生活质量显著下降,经常因急性心脏失代偿住院。由于这些高住院率,医疗保健系统也有明显的经济负担。心脏康复是一项多学科干预,在冠状动脉血管重建术后得到了很好的应用,但在心力衰竭患者中的应用仍然不足。本综述基于近期美国随机对照试验(rct)评估其益处。方法在PubMed上进行综合检索,找出2020年1月至2025年2月期间在美国发表的相关英文rct。搜索策略包括关键词:“心脏康复”、“运动”、“体力活动”、“心力衰竭”、“HFrEF”、“HFpEF”、“充血性心力衰竭”、“慢性心力衰竭”和“CHF”。仅纳入成人患者(≥18岁)的研究。本文献综述选取了六项研究,这些研究直接测量了心脏康复对心力衰竭患者的影响。结果与常规治疗相比,心脏康复治疗显著提高了患者的运动能力、最大摄氧量、腿部力量和生活质量。观察到动脉僵硬度、心肌僵硬度和左心室质量的降低。干预持续了12周到1年,高强度和阻力运动比中等强度的锻炼效果更好。然而,6个月再住院率和死亡率无显著差异。结论心脏康复可提高心衰患者的运动耐量和生活质量,但死亡率和住院率保持不变。未来的研究应探讨其对患者和医疗保健系统的直接经济影响,以及心脏康复在不同心力衰竭阶段的有效性。将心脏康复转诊纳入出院后和门诊工作流程可以优化心力衰竭患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BENEFITS OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION IN HEART FAILURE: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Therapeutic Area

Heart Failure

Background

Approximately 6.7 million adults in the U.S. have a diagnosis of heart failure, with a projected prevalence of 11.4 million by 2050. These individuals experience a significant decrease in quality of life and frequent hospitalizations for acute cardiac decompensation. There is also an evident economic burden on the healthcare system due to these high rates of hospitalizations. Cardiac rehabilitation, a multidisciplinary intervention, is well-established for post-coronary revascularization procedures but remains underutilized for heart failure patients. This review evaluates its benefits based on recent U.S. based randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed to identify relevant RCTs carried out in the US and published in English between January 2020 to February 2025. The search strategy included keywords: “cardiac rehabilitation”, “exercise”, “physical activity”, “heart failure”, “HFrEF”, “HFpEF”, “congestive heart failure”, “chronic heart failure”, and “CHF”. Only studies involving adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) were included. Six studies, which directly measured the effects of cardiac rehab on patients with heart failure, were selected for this literature review.

Results

Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved exercise capacity, peak VO2, leg strength, and quality of life compared to usual care. Reductions in arterial stiffness, myocardial stiffness, and left ventricular mass were observed. Interventions lasted 12 weeks to 1 year, with high-intensity and resistance exercises yielding better outcomes than moderate-intensity workouts. However, no significant difference was found in 6-month rehospitalization or mortality rates.

Conclusions

Cardiac rehabilitation enhances exercise tolerance and quality of life in heart failure patients, though mortality and hospitalization rates remain unchanged. Future research should explore its direct economic impact on both patients and the healthcare system and the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation across different stages of heart failure. Integrating cardiac rehab referrals into post-discharge and outpatient workflow may optimize heart failure patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信