使用3D成像进行面部尺寸的人体测量分析,用于法医鉴定和特定种族的参考模型

Q3 Medicine
Saurjya Ranjan Das , Sreepreeti Champatyray , Dhiren Kumar Panda
{"title":"使用3D成像进行面部尺寸的人体测量分析,用于法医鉴定和特定种族的参考模型","authors":"Saurjya Ranjan Das ,&nbsp;Sreepreeti Champatyray ,&nbsp;Dhiren Kumar Panda","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Facial morphology plays a crucial role in forensic identification, anthropological research, and reconstructive surgery. However, forensic reference databases often lack ethnicity-specific 3D anthropometric data, limiting the accuracy of forensic facial reconstruction and automated facial recognition systems. This study integrates 3D imaging technology and multivariate statistical analyses to enhance forensic facial identification models by providing ethnicity-specific facial measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 500 participants (250 males and 250 females) from seven Indian ethnic groups (Odia, Bengali, Tamil, Punjabi, Maratha, Telugu, and Gujarati). High-resolution 3D facial scans were obtained using the Artec Eva 3D scanner and analyzed using landmark-based anthropometry. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) assessed sex and ethnic differences in upper facial height (UFH), lower facial height (LFH), intercanthal distance (ICD), and face width (FW). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were used to evaluate the interdependencies among facial dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Males exhibited significantly larger UFH and ICD, while females had greater LFH (p &lt; 0.001). Significant ethnic differences were observed (p &lt; 0.01), with the Odia group having the widest face and the Bengali group showing the smallest ICD. PCA revealed two major components that explained 81.4 % of the total variance, with UFH and FW being the primary contributors. SEM demonstrated a strong correlation between UFH and FW (β = 0.72, p &lt; 0.001) and an inverse relationship between LFH and ICD (β = −0.48, p = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides forensically relevant, ethnicity-specific 3D anthropometric data for facial reconstruction and forensic identification. These findings support the integration of 3D morphometric databases into forensic facial analysis software, enhancing population-specific identification accuracy. Future research should consider including Body Mass Index (BMI) as a variable to account for the potential impact of soft tissue distribution on facial morphology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropometric analysis of facial dimensions using 3D imaging for forensic identification and ethnicity-specific reference models\",\"authors\":\"Saurjya Ranjan Das ,&nbsp;Sreepreeti Champatyray ,&nbsp;Dhiren Kumar Panda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Facial morphology plays a crucial role in forensic identification, anthropological research, and reconstructive surgery. However, forensic reference databases often lack ethnicity-specific 3D anthropometric data, limiting the accuracy of forensic facial reconstruction and automated facial recognition systems. This study integrates 3D imaging technology and multivariate statistical analyses to enhance forensic facial identification models by providing ethnicity-specific facial measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 500 participants (250 males and 250 females) from seven Indian ethnic groups (Odia, Bengali, Tamil, Punjabi, Maratha, Telugu, and Gujarati). High-resolution 3D facial scans were obtained using the Artec Eva 3D scanner and analyzed using landmark-based anthropometry. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) assessed sex and ethnic differences in upper facial height (UFH), lower facial height (LFH), intercanthal distance (ICD), and face width (FW). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were used to evaluate the interdependencies among facial dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Males exhibited significantly larger UFH and ICD, while females had greater LFH (p &lt; 0.001). Significant ethnic differences were observed (p &lt; 0.01), with the Odia group having the widest face and the Bengali group showing the smallest ICD. PCA revealed two major components that explained 81.4 % of the total variance, with UFH and FW being the primary contributors. SEM demonstrated a strong correlation between UFH and FW (β = 0.72, p &lt; 0.001) and an inverse relationship between LFH and ICD (β = −0.48, p = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides forensically relevant, ethnicity-specific 3D anthropometric data for facial reconstruction and forensic identification. These findings support the integration of 3D morphometric databases into forensic facial analysis software, enhancing population-specific identification accuracy. Future research should consider including Body Mass Index (BMI) as a variable to account for the potential impact of soft tissue distribution on facial morphology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910725000246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910725000246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面部形态学在法医鉴定、人类学研究和重建手术中起着至关重要的作用。然而,法医参考数据库往往缺乏特定种族的3D人体测量数据,限制了法医面部重建和自动面部识别系统的准确性。本研究将3D影像技术与多元统计分析相结合,通过提供特定种族的面部测量来增强法医面部识别模型。方法对来自印度7个民族(奥迪亚族、孟加拉族、泰米尔族、旁遮普族、马拉地族、泰卢固族和古吉拉特族)的500名参与者(250男250女)进行横断面研究。使用Artec Eva 3D扫描仪获得高分辨率3D面部扫描,并使用基于地标的人体测量学进行分析。多变量方差分析(MANOVA)评估了上面部高度(UFH)、下面部高度(LFH)、颊间距离(ICD)和面部宽度(FW)的性别和种族差异。采用主成分分析(PCA)和结构方程模型(SEM)来评估面部维度之间的相互依赖性。结果男性有较大的UFH和ICD,女性有较大的LFH (p <; 0.001)。观察到显著的种族差异(p <; 0.01),Odia组的面部最宽,孟加拉组的ICD最小。PCA揭示了两个主要成分,解释了81.4 %的总方差,其中UFH和FW是主要贡献者。扫描电镜显示UFH和FW之间有很强的相关性(β = 0.72, p <; 0.001),LFH和ICD之间呈负相关(β = - 0.48, p = 0.002)。结论本研究为面部重建和法医鉴定提供了与法医相关的、种族特异性的三维人体测量数据。这些发现支持将3D形态测量数据库集成到法医面部分析软件中,从而提高特定人群识别的准确性。未来的研究应考虑将身体质量指数(BMI)作为一个变量,以解释软组织分布对面部形态的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anthropometric analysis of facial dimensions using 3D imaging for forensic identification and ethnicity-specific reference models

Background

Facial morphology plays a crucial role in forensic identification, anthropological research, and reconstructive surgery. However, forensic reference databases often lack ethnicity-specific 3D anthropometric data, limiting the accuracy of forensic facial reconstruction and automated facial recognition systems. This study integrates 3D imaging technology and multivariate statistical analyses to enhance forensic facial identification models by providing ethnicity-specific facial measurements.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 500 participants (250 males and 250 females) from seven Indian ethnic groups (Odia, Bengali, Tamil, Punjabi, Maratha, Telugu, and Gujarati). High-resolution 3D facial scans were obtained using the Artec Eva 3D scanner and analyzed using landmark-based anthropometry. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) assessed sex and ethnic differences in upper facial height (UFH), lower facial height (LFH), intercanthal distance (ICD), and face width (FW). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were used to evaluate the interdependencies among facial dimensions.

Results

Males exhibited significantly larger UFH and ICD, while females had greater LFH (p < 0.001). Significant ethnic differences were observed (p < 0.01), with the Odia group having the widest face and the Bengali group showing the smallest ICD. PCA revealed two major components that explained 81.4 % of the total variance, with UFH and FW being the primary contributors. SEM demonstrated a strong correlation between UFH and FW (β = 0.72, p < 0.001) and an inverse relationship between LFH and ICD (β = −0.48, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

This study provides forensically relevant, ethnicity-specific 3D anthropometric data for facial reconstruction and forensic identification. These findings support the integration of 3D morphometric databases into forensic facial analysis software, enhancing population-specific identification accuracy. Future research should consider including Body Mass Index (BMI) as a variable to account for the potential impact of soft tissue distribution on facial morphology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信