300兆瓦谷电制氢亚临界电厂氢共烧深度调峰技术经济分析

IF 5.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Tiantian Wang , Jinwei Sun , Fuqi Yuan , Mingye Yang , Yang Zhang , Fuyuan Yang , Minggao Ouyang
{"title":"300兆瓦谷电制氢亚临界电厂氢共烧深度调峰技术经济分析","authors":"Tiantian Wang ,&nbsp;Jinwei Sun ,&nbsp;Fuqi Yuan ,&nbsp;Mingye Yang ,&nbsp;Yang Zhang ,&nbsp;Fuyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Minggao Ouyang","doi":"10.1016/j.proci.2025.105839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the proportion of renewable power generation increases annually, thermal power plants are supposed to operate in deep peaking with high flexibility to balance power supply and power demand as well as ensure grid security. Hydrogen co-firing in thermal power plants is one of the promising approaches to maintaining stable combustion during deep peaking periods, improving peak capacity, and reducing carbon emissions. This paper numerically investigated the thermodynamic performance of deep peaking at 30 % and 20 % heating loads for hydrogen co-firing in a 300 MWe subcritical power plant using the Aspen Plus model and conducted an economic analysis of four scenarios of boiler deep peaking and hydrogen production from valley electricity. The results show that as the hydrogen blending heat ratio increases from 0 % to 15 % with the constant total excess air ratio of 1.15 at 30 % heating load, the boiler thermal efficiency increases from 91.13 % to 92.05 %, the standard coal consumption decreases from 395 g/kWh to 331 g/kWh, and the CO<sub>2</sub> emission per unit of fuel heat input also drops from 132.52 g/MJ to 112.55 g/MJ. If the boiler heating load is further adjusted to 20 %, hydrogen blending and oxygen enrichment can also improve the theoretical combustion temperature and boiler efficiency, as well as save coal and reduce carbon emissions. Regarding the economic analysis, the prices of standard coal and electrolyzers are two key factors affecting the payback time. As the capacity of electrolyzers decreases from 60 MW in Scenario 2 to 20 MW in Scenario 4, the payback time drops from 10.45 years to 3.63 years. In the meantime, the hydrogen blending heat ratio also decreases from 15 % to 5 % at 20 % heating load. There exists a tradeoff between a high hydrogen blending ratio (which means more stable combustion at low heating loads) and a short payback time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":408,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 105839"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic analysis of deep peaking for hydrogen co-firing in a 300 MWe subcritical power plant with hydrogen production from valley electricity\",\"authors\":\"Tiantian Wang ,&nbsp;Jinwei Sun ,&nbsp;Fuqi Yuan ,&nbsp;Mingye Yang ,&nbsp;Yang Zhang ,&nbsp;Fuyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Minggao Ouyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.proci.2025.105839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the proportion of renewable power generation increases annually, thermal power plants are supposed to operate in deep peaking with high flexibility to balance power supply and power demand as well as ensure grid security. Hydrogen co-firing in thermal power plants is one of the promising approaches to maintaining stable combustion during deep peaking periods, improving peak capacity, and reducing carbon emissions. This paper numerically investigated the thermodynamic performance of deep peaking at 30 % and 20 % heating loads for hydrogen co-firing in a 300 MWe subcritical power plant using the Aspen Plus model and conducted an economic analysis of four scenarios of boiler deep peaking and hydrogen production from valley electricity. The results show that as the hydrogen blending heat ratio increases from 0 % to 15 % with the constant total excess air ratio of 1.15 at 30 % heating load, the boiler thermal efficiency increases from 91.13 % to 92.05 %, the standard coal consumption decreases from 395 g/kWh to 331 g/kWh, and the CO<sub>2</sub> emission per unit of fuel heat input also drops from 132.52 g/MJ to 112.55 g/MJ. If the boiler heating load is further adjusted to 20 %, hydrogen blending and oxygen enrichment can also improve the theoretical combustion temperature and boiler efficiency, as well as save coal and reduce carbon emissions. Regarding the economic analysis, the prices of standard coal and electrolyzers are two key factors affecting the payback time. As the capacity of electrolyzers decreases from 60 MW in Scenario 2 to 20 MW in Scenario 4, the payback time drops from 10.45 years to 3.63 years. In the meantime, the hydrogen blending heat ratio also decreases from 15 % to 5 % at 20 % heating load. There exists a tradeoff between a high hydrogen blending ratio (which means more stable combustion at low heating loads) and a short payback time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540748925000537\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540748925000537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着可再生能源发电比重的逐年增加,火电厂为实现电力供需平衡,保障电网安全,需要具有较高灵活性的深调峰运行。火电厂的氢共烧是一种很有前途的方法,可以在深峰期保持稳定燃烧,提高峰值容量,减少碳排放。本文采用Aspen Plus模型对300mwe亚临界电厂在30%和20%热负荷下的氢共烧深度调峰热力性能进行了数值研究,并对锅炉深度调峰和谷电制氢四种方案进行了经济分析。结果表明:在30%热负荷下,当混氢热率由0%提高到15%,总过剩空气比为1.15恒定时,锅炉热效率由91.13%提高到92.05%,标准煤消耗量由395 g/kWh下降到331 g/kWh,单位燃料热输入CO2排放量由132.52 g/MJ下降到112.55 g/MJ。若将锅炉热负荷进一步调整为20%,配氢富氧还能提高理论燃烧温度和锅炉效率,节约煤炭,减少碳排放。从经济性分析来看,标准煤价格和电解槽价格是影响投资回收期的两个关键因素。随着电解槽容量从场景2的60mw减少到场景4的20mw,投资回收期从10.45年下降到3.63年。同时,在热负荷为20%时,混氢热率也从15%下降到5%。在高氢混合比(这意味着在低热负荷下更稳定的燃烧)和较短的投资回收期之间存在权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-economic analysis of deep peaking for hydrogen co-firing in a 300 MWe subcritical power plant with hydrogen production from valley electricity
As the proportion of renewable power generation increases annually, thermal power plants are supposed to operate in deep peaking with high flexibility to balance power supply and power demand as well as ensure grid security. Hydrogen co-firing in thermal power plants is one of the promising approaches to maintaining stable combustion during deep peaking periods, improving peak capacity, and reducing carbon emissions. This paper numerically investigated the thermodynamic performance of deep peaking at 30 % and 20 % heating loads for hydrogen co-firing in a 300 MWe subcritical power plant using the Aspen Plus model and conducted an economic analysis of four scenarios of boiler deep peaking and hydrogen production from valley electricity. The results show that as the hydrogen blending heat ratio increases from 0 % to 15 % with the constant total excess air ratio of 1.15 at 30 % heating load, the boiler thermal efficiency increases from 91.13 % to 92.05 %, the standard coal consumption decreases from 395 g/kWh to 331 g/kWh, and the CO2 emission per unit of fuel heat input also drops from 132.52 g/MJ to 112.55 g/MJ. If the boiler heating load is further adjusted to 20 %, hydrogen blending and oxygen enrichment can also improve the theoretical combustion temperature and boiler efficiency, as well as save coal and reduce carbon emissions. Regarding the economic analysis, the prices of standard coal and electrolyzers are two key factors affecting the payback time. As the capacity of electrolyzers decreases from 60 MW in Scenario 2 to 20 MW in Scenario 4, the payback time drops from 10.45 years to 3.63 years. In the meantime, the hydrogen blending heat ratio also decreases from 15 % to 5 % at 20 % heating load. There exists a tradeoff between a high hydrogen blending ratio (which means more stable combustion at low heating loads) and a short payback time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains forefront contributions in fundamentals and applications of combustion science. For more than 50 years, the Combustion Institute has served as the peak international society for dissemination of scientific and technical research in the combustion field. In addition to author submissions, the Proceedings of the Combustion Institute includes the Institute''s prestigious invited strategic and topical reviews that represent indispensable resources for emergent research in the field. All papers are subjected to rigorous peer review. Research papers and invited topical reviews; Reaction Kinetics; Soot, PAH, and other large molecules; Diagnostics; Laminar Flames; Turbulent Flames; Heterogeneous Combustion; Spray and Droplet Combustion; Detonations, Explosions & Supersonic Combustion; Fire Research; Stationary Combustion Systems; IC Engine and Gas Turbine Combustion; New Technology Concepts The electronic version of Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains supplemental material such as reaction mechanisms, illustrating movies, and other data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信