评估抖音上胆固醇相关内容的质量、准确性和健康影响:一项社交媒体分析

IF 5.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Khush Kharidia MD, Niyanta Joshi BS, Abel Thomas BS, Ali Sadek BS, Gabrielle Schwab MD, Colby Ayers MS, Amit Khera MD, MSc
{"title":"评估抖音上胆固醇相关内容的质量、准确性和健康影响:一项社交媒体分析","authors":"Khush Kharidia MD,&nbsp;Niyanta Joshi BS,&nbsp;Abel Thomas BS,&nbsp;Ali Sadek BS,&nbsp;Gabrielle Schwab MD,&nbsp;Colby Ayers MS,&nbsp;Amit Khera MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD /CVD Risk Reduction</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypercholesterolemia affects 86 million US adults, but only 54% are on cholesterol-lowering medications. Social media platforms like TikTok with over 1 billion users worldwide, offer both educational opportunities and risks of misinformation. This study evaluates the quality, accuracy, and health impact of cholesterol-related videos on social media through a TikTok analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched #highcholesterol and #cholesterol on a new TikTok account on August 11, 2024. Of the 14,200 and 58,000 videos identified from each search term respectively, we evaluated the top 150 videos in each. Of the 300 total videos, 200 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Video analysis included engagement metrics, content, PEMAT-AV understandability and actionability scores, quality (GQS, mDISCERN), accuracy, and harm-benefit scores. Video content creators were classified as cardiologists, non-cardiologist physicians, other healthcare professionals, and lay creators. Evaluations were standardized with a grading rubric and a cardiologist-led training. Each video was graded for quality, accuracy, and harm-benefit by 2 independent reviewers. Videos with discrepant scores were graded by an expert cardiologist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 200 videos had a total of 85,355,400 views, 3,264,000 likes, and 1,009,200 shares. 12% were made by cardiologists, 11.5% by other physicians, and 32.0% by other healthcare professionals. Diet (54%) and pathophysiology (59%) were the most discussed topics; exercise (4%) was the least discussed. 53% were advisory, 37% educational, and 18% promotional. Mean GQS, mDISCERN, PEVAT understandability, and PEVAT actionability (65% ± 39%) scores by content creator type were significantly different (Figure 1, p &lt; 0.05), with higher scores noted in physician creators. Of the videos, 41% were deemed inaccurate and 36% were deemed potentially harmful. Videos by cardiologists and other physicians had significantly higher accuracy and health benefit scores than those by non-physicians (Figure 2).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The quality of content related to cholesterol on TikTok is low. Cholesterol misinformation is prevalent on TikTok. Videos by non-physician creators have lower quality, inaccuracies, and potential for harm. As video sharing social media platforms gain traction, clinician awareness of inaccuracies in patient-accessed cholesterol information is vital and strategies for credible content creation are necessary to combat this issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101139"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATING THE QUALITY, ACCURACY AND HEALTH IMPACT OF CHOLESTEROL-RELATED CONTENT ON TIKTOK: A SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"Khush Kharidia MD,&nbsp;Niyanta Joshi BS,&nbsp;Abel Thomas BS,&nbsp;Ali Sadek BS,&nbsp;Gabrielle Schwab MD,&nbsp;Colby Ayers MS,&nbsp;Amit Khera MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD /CVD Risk Reduction</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypercholesterolemia affects 86 million US adults, but only 54% are on cholesterol-lowering medications. Social media platforms like TikTok with over 1 billion users worldwide, offer both educational opportunities and risks of misinformation. This study evaluates the quality, accuracy, and health impact of cholesterol-related videos on social media through a TikTok analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched #highcholesterol and #cholesterol on a new TikTok account on August 11, 2024. Of the 14,200 and 58,000 videos identified from each search term respectively, we evaluated the top 150 videos in each. Of the 300 total videos, 200 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Video analysis included engagement metrics, content, PEMAT-AV understandability and actionability scores, quality (GQS, mDISCERN), accuracy, and harm-benefit scores. Video content creators were classified as cardiologists, non-cardiologist physicians, other healthcare professionals, and lay creators. Evaluations were standardized with a grading rubric and a cardiologist-led training. Each video was graded for quality, accuracy, and harm-benefit by 2 independent reviewers. Videos with discrepant scores were graded by an expert cardiologist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 200 videos had a total of 85,355,400 views, 3,264,000 likes, and 1,009,200 shares. 12% were made by cardiologists, 11.5% by other physicians, and 32.0% by other healthcare professionals. Diet (54%) and pathophysiology (59%) were the most discussed topics; exercise (4%) was the least discussed. 53% were advisory, 37% educational, and 18% promotional. Mean GQS, mDISCERN, PEVAT understandability, and PEVAT actionability (65% ± 39%) scores by content creator type were significantly different (Figure 1, p &lt; 0.05), with higher scores noted in physician creators. Of the videos, 41% were deemed inaccurate and 36% were deemed potentially harmful. Videos by cardiologists and other physicians had significantly higher accuracy and health benefit scores than those by non-physicians (Figure 2).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The quality of content related to cholesterol on TikTok is low. Cholesterol misinformation is prevalent on TikTok. Videos by non-physician creators have lower quality, inaccuracies, and potential for harm. As video sharing social media platforms gain traction, clinician awareness of inaccuracies in patient-accessed cholesterol information is vital and strategies for credible content creation are necessary to combat this issue.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725002144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725002144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗领域ascvd /CVD风险降低背景高胆固醇血症影响8600万美国成年人,但只有54%的人在服用降胆固醇药物。抖音等社交媒体平台在全球拥有超过10亿用户,既提供了教育机会,也存在错误信息的风险。本研究通过TikTok分析,评估了社交媒体上胆固醇相关视频的质量、准确性和健康影响。我们于2024年8月11日在一个新的TikTok账户上搜索了#高胆固醇和#胆固醇。在从每个搜索词中分别识别出的14,200和58,000个视频中,我们评估了每个搜索词中排名前150位的视频。在总共300个视频中,有200个符合纳入标准并进行了分析。视频分析包括参与指标、内容、PEMAT-AV可理解性和可操作性评分、质量(GQS、mDISCERN)、准确性和损益评分。视频内容创作者分为心脏病专家、非心脏病专家医生、其他医疗保健专业人员和非专业创作者。通过评分标准和心脏病专家主导的培训,对评估进行了标准化。每个视频的质量、准确性和损益由2个独立的评论家进行评分。评分不一致的视频由心脏病专家评分。结果这200个视频共有85,355,400次观看,3,264,000次点赞,1,009,200次分享。心脏病专家占12%,其他医生占11.5%,其他医疗专业人员占32.0%。饮食(54%)和病理生理(59%)是讨论最多的话题;运动(4%)被讨论得最少。53%是咨询,37%是教育,18%是宣传。内容创作者类型的平均GQS、mDISCERN、PEVAT可理解性和PEVAT可操作性(65%±39%)得分有显著差异(图1,p < 0.05),医生创作者得分较高。在这些视频中,41%被认为是不准确的,36%被认为有潜在危害。心脏病专家和其他医生制作的视频比非医生制作的视频具有更高的准确性和健康效益得分(图2)。结论TikTok上与胆固醇相关的内容质量较低。有关胆固醇的错误信息在TikTok上很普遍。由非医生创作者制作的视频质量较低,不准确,并且有潜在的危害。随着视频分享社交媒体平台的发展,临床医生意识到患者获取的胆固醇信息不准确是至关重要的,创造可信内容的策略是解决这一问题所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATING THE QUALITY, ACCURACY AND HEALTH IMPACT OF CHOLESTEROL-RELATED CONTENT ON TIKTOK: A SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS

Therapeutic Area

ASCVD /CVD Risk Reduction

Background

Hypercholesterolemia affects 86 million US adults, but only 54% are on cholesterol-lowering medications. Social media platforms like TikTok with over 1 billion users worldwide, offer both educational opportunities and risks of misinformation. This study evaluates the quality, accuracy, and health impact of cholesterol-related videos on social media through a TikTok analysis.

Methods

We searched #highcholesterol and #cholesterol on a new TikTok account on August 11, 2024. Of the 14,200 and 58,000 videos identified from each search term respectively, we evaluated the top 150 videos in each. Of the 300 total videos, 200 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Video analysis included engagement metrics, content, PEMAT-AV understandability and actionability scores, quality (GQS, mDISCERN), accuracy, and harm-benefit scores. Video content creators were classified as cardiologists, non-cardiologist physicians, other healthcare professionals, and lay creators. Evaluations were standardized with a grading rubric and a cardiologist-led training. Each video was graded for quality, accuracy, and harm-benefit by 2 independent reviewers. Videos with discrepant scores were graded by an expert cardiologist.

Results

The 200 videos had a total of 85,355,400 views, 3,264,000 likes, and 1,009,200 shares. 12% were made by cardiologists, 11.5% by other physicians, and 32.0% by other healthcare professionals. Diet (54%) and pathophysiology (59%) were the most discussed topics; exercise (4%) was the least discussed. 53% were advisory, 37% educational, and 18% promotional. Mean GQS, mDISCERN, PEVAT understandability, and PEVAT actionability (65% ± 39%) scores by content creator type were significantly different (Figure 1, p < 0.05), with higher scores noted in physician creators. Of the videos, 41% were deemed inaccurate and 36% were deemed potentially harmful. Videos by cardiologists and other physicians had significantly higher accuracy and health benefit scores than those by non-physicians (Figure 2).

Conclusions

The quality of content related to cholesterol on TikTok is low. Cholesterol misinformation is prevalent on TikTok. Videos by non-physician creators have lower quality, inaccuracies, and potential for harm. As video sharing social media platforms gain traction, clinician awareness of inaccuracies in patient-accessed cholesterol information is vital and strategies for credible content creation are necessary to combat this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信