依帕氟净和卡格列净fda不良事件报告系统(faers)事件药理学监测研究

IF 5.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ilana Logvinsky MD MPH, Gautam Maddineni MD, Eric Wu DO, Vivek Singh MD, Nabil Benhayoun MD
{"title":"依帕氟净和卡格列净fda不良事件报告系统(faers)事件药理学监测研究","authors":"Ilana Logvinsky MD MPH,&nbsp;Gautam Maddineni MD,&nbsp;Eric Wu DO,&nbsp;Vivek Singh MD,&nbsp;Nabil Benhayoun MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Pharmacologic Therapy</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are widely used to manage type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease by preventing glucose reabsorption in the renal tubules. These medications effectively reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, SGLT2 inhibitors have been associated with specific adverse events, necessitating a careful evaluation of their safety profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adverse event data for empagliflozin and canagliflozin from January 2016 to September 2024 were extracted from the FAERS database. Reported side effects analyzed included DKA, euDKA, bacterial UTIs, fungal urogenital infections, and Fournier's gangrene. RORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the relative risk of these adverse events for the two medications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total reported adverse events for empagliflozin and canagliflozin were 32,471 and 16,322, respectively. Empagliflozin was associated with a significantly higher risk of euDKA (ROR 2.88, CI 2.47–3.35), bacterial UTIs (ROR 1.29, CI 1.15– 1.46), fungal urogenital infections (ROR 1.66, C 1.50–1.84), and Fournier's gangrene (ROR 1.91, CI 1.65–2.23) compared to canagliflozin. In contrast, empagliflozin demonstrated a lower risk of developing DKA compared to canagliflozin (ROR 0.81, CI 0.76–0.86). All findings were statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Empagliflozin and canagliflozin are SGLT2 inhibitors with distinct safety profiles commonly used. Empagliflozin is associated with a higher risk of euDKA, bacterial UTIs, fungal urogenital infections, and Fournier's gangrene but a lower risk of DKA compared to canagliflozin. For patients with a predisposition to urinary tract infections (bacterial or fungal), canagliflozin may be preferred. Similarly, canagliflozin may be a better option for patients with uncontrolled diabetes due to its lower risk of euDKA. Individualized therapy based on patient- specific risk factors is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101144"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PHARMACOLOGIC SURVEILLANCE STUDY OF FDA ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM (FAERS) EVENTS OF EMPAGOFLOZIN AND CANAGLIFLOZIN\",\"authors\":\"Ilana Logvinsky MD MPH,&nbsp;Gautam Maddineni MD,&nbsp;Eric Wu DO,&nbsp;Vivek Singh MD,&nbsp;Nabil Benhayoun MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Pharmacologic Therapy</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are widely used to manage type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease by preventing glucose reabsorption in the renal tubules. These medications effectively reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, SGLT2 inhibitors have been associated with specific adverse events, necessitating a careful evaluation of their safety profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adverse event data for empagliflozin and canagliflozin from January 2016 to September 2024 were extracted from the FAERS database. Reported side effects analyzed included DKA, euDKA, bacterial UTIs, fungal urogenital infections, and Fournier's gangrene. RORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the relative risk of these adverse events for the two medications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total reported adverse events for empagliflozin and canagliflozin were 32,471 and 16,322, respectively. Empagliflozin was associated with a significantly higher risk of euDKA (ROR 2.88, CI 2.47–3.35), bacterial UTIs (ROR 1.29, CI 1.15– 1.46), fungal urogenital infections (ROR 1.66, C 1.50–1.84), and Fournier's gangrene (ROR 1.91, CI 1.65–2.23) compared to canagliflozin. In contrast, empagliflozin demonstrated a lower risk of developing DKA compared to canagliflozin (ROR 0.81, CI 0.76–0.86). All findings were statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Empagliflozin and canagliflozin are SGLT2 inhibitors with distinct safety profiles commonly used. Empagliflozin is associated with a higher risk of euDKA, bacterial UTIs, fungal urogenital infections, and Fournier's gangrene but a lower risk of DKA compared to canagliflozin. For patients with a predisposition to urinary tract infections (bacterial or fungal), canagliflozin may be preferred. Similarly, canagliflozin may be a better option for patients with uncontrolled diabetes due to its lower risk of euDKA. Individualized therapy based on patient- specific risk factors is recommended.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725002193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725002193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2 (SGLT2)抑制剂被广泛用于治疗2型糖尿病、心力衰竭和慢性肾脏疾病,其作用是防止肾小管中的葡萄糖重吸收。这些药物有效地降低了主要不良心血管事件的风险。然而,SGLT2抑制剂与特定的不良事件相关,需要仔细评估其安全性。方法从FAERS数据库中提取2016年1月至2024年9月期间恩格列净和卡格列净的不良事件数据。报告的副作用分析包括DKA、euDKA、细菌性尿路感染、泌尿生殖真菌感染和富尼耶坏疽。计算RORs和95%置信区间(ci)来比较两种药物的这些不良事件的相对风险。结果恩格列净和卡格列净报告的不良事件总数分别为32471例和16322例。与卡格列净相比,恩帕列净与euDKA (ROR 2.88, CI 2.47-3.35)、细菌性尿路感染(ROR 1.29, CI 1.15 - 1.46)、泌尿生殖真菌感染(ROR 1.66, CI 1.50-1.84)和富尼耶坏疽(ROR 1.91, CI 1.65-2.23)的风险显著升高相关。相比之下,与卡格列净相比,恩格列净显示出较低的DKA发生风险(ROR 0.81, CI 0.76-0.86)。所有结果均具有统计学意义。结论塞格列净和卡格列净是常用的SGLT2抑制剂,具有不同的安全性。恩格列净与euDKA、细菌性尿路感染、泌尿生殖真菌感染和富尼耶坏疽的高风险相关,但与卡格列净相比,DKA的风险较低。对于易患尿路感染(细菌或真菌)的患者,卡格列净可能是首选。同样,卡格列净因其euDKA风险较低,可能是未控制糖尿病患者的更好选择。建议根据患者特定的危险因素进行个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PHARMACOLOGIC SURVEILLANCE STUDY OF FDA ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM (FAERS) EVENTS OF EMPAGOFLOZIN AND CANAGLIFLOZIN

Therapeutic Area

Pharmacologic Therapy

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are widely used to manage type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease by preventing glucose reabsorption in the renal tubules. These medications effectively reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, SGLT2 inhibitors have been associated with specific adverse events, necessitating a careful evaluation of their safety profiles.

Methods

Adverse event data for empagliflozin and canagliflozin from January 2016 to September 2024 were extracted from the FAERS database. Reported side effects analyzed included DKA, euDKA, bacterial UTIs, fungal urogenital infections, and Fournier's gangrene. RORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the relative risk of these adverse events for the two medications.

Results

The total reported adverse events for empagliflozin and canagliflozin were 32,471 and 16,322, respectively. Empagliflozin was associated with a significantly higher risk of euDKA (ROR 2.88, CI 2.47–3.35), bacterial UTIs (ROR 1.29, CI 1.15– 1.46), fungal urogenital infections (ROR 1.66, C 1.50–1.84), and Fournier's gangrene (ROR 1.91, CI 1.65–2.23) compared to canagliflozin. In contrast, empagliflozin demonstrated a lower risk of developing DKA compared to canagliflozin (ROR 0.81, CI 0.76–0.86). All findings were statistically significant.

Conclusions

Empagliflozin and canagliflozin are SGLT2 inhibitors with distinct safety profiles commonly used. Empagliflozin is associated with a higher risk of euDKA, bacterial UTIs, fungal urogenital infections, and Fournier's gangrene but a lower risk of DKA compared to canagliflozin. For patients with a predisposition to urinary tract infections (bacterial or fungal), canagliflozin may be preferred. Similarly, canagliflozin may be a better option for patients with uncontrolled diabetes due to its lower risk of euDKA. Individualized therapy based on patient- specific risk factors is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信