人脐带间充质干细胞和富血小板纤维蛋白支架植入后下颌软骨缺损再生的生物力学分析:实验动物研究

Q1 Medicine
Ni Putu Mira Sumarta , Surya Atmajaya , Olivia Jennifer Gunardi , Andra Rizqiawan , Coen Pramono Danudiningrat , Tengku Natasha Eleena binti Tengku Ahmad Noor
{"title":"人脐带间充质干细胞和富血小板纤维蛋白支架植入后下颌软骨缺损再生的生物力学分析:实验动物研究","authors":"Ni Putu Mira Sumarta ,&nbsp;Surya Atmajaya ,&nbsp;Olivia Jennifer Gunardi ,&nbsp;Andra Rizqiawan ,&nbsp;Coen Pramono Danudiningrat ,&nbsp;Tengku Natasha Eleena binti Tengku Ahmad Noor","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Regenerative medicine is therapy that is expected to be effective for mandibular cartilage defect regeneration. Nevertheless, the biomechanical aspects of mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration are still rarely discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed too analyze the compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus in the mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration in an animal model after the implantation of <strong>human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (</strong>hUCMSC) and <strong>platelet rich fibrin</strong> (PRF) scaffolds. <strong>Materials and Methods</strong>: The defect were made on 80 New Zealand White Rabbit mandibular condyle cartilages and divided into four groups (three experimental and one control group). The experimental groups consisted of defects treated with implantations of PRF, hUCMSC, and hUCMSC with PRF. Each group consisted of 5 rats, observed for 4-weeks and then euthanized. Compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus tests were done with Universal Testing Machine. A comparative analysis was performed using SPSS v25 software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The hUCMSC group had a higher strength of compression (13,462 ± 0,889) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,000) and tensile strength (2723 ± 0,985) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,003) than the other groups. The average shear strength and elastic modulus showed that the hUCMSC (1162 ± 0,090 and 8700 ± 1502) and combination groups (0,728 ± 0,071 and 7742 ± 0,814) have significantly higher values than the other groups (p = 0,014 and p = 0,000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The implantation of hUCMSC results in a high compression and tensile strength of the regenerated defect. The implantation of hUCMSC or hUCMSC seeded on a PRF scaffold is a novel method for mandible cartilage regeneration, and they showed better biomechanics in shear strength and elastic modulus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 6","pages":"Pages 1526-1533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical analysis of mandibular cartilage defect regeneration after implantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and a platelet rich fibrin scaffold: an experimental animal study\",\"authors\":\"Ni Putu Mira Sumarta ,&nbsp;Surya Atmajaya ,&nbsp;Olivia Jennifer Gunardi ,&nbsp;Andra Rizqiawan ,&nbsp;Coen Pramono Danudiningrat ,&nbsp;Tengku Natasha Eleena binti Tengku Ahmad Noor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Regenerative medicine is therapy that is expected to be effective for mandibular cartilage defect regeneration. Nevertheless, the biomechanical aspects of mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration are still rarely discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed too analyze the compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus in the mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration in an animal model after the implantation of <strong>human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (</strong>hUCMSC) and <strong>platelet rich fibrin</strong> (PRF) scaffolds. <strong>Materials and Methods</strong>: The defect were made on 80 New Zealand White Rabbit mandibular condyle cartilages and divided into four groups (three experimental and one control group). The experimental groups consisted of defects treated with implantations of PRF, hUCMSC, and hUCMSC with PRF. Each group consisted of 5 rats, observed for 4-weeks and then euthanized. Compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus tests were done with Universal Testing Machine. A comparative analysis was performed using SPSS v25 software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The hUCMSC group had a higher strength of compression (13,462 ± 0,889) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,000) and tensile strength (2723 ± 0,985) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,003) than the other groups. The average shear strength and elastic modulus showed that the hUCMSC (1162 ± 0,090 and 8700 ± 1502) and combination groups (0,728 ± 0,071 and 7742 ± 0,814) have significantly higher values than the other groups (p = 0,014 and p = 0,000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The implantation of hUCMSC results in a high compression and tensile strength of the regenerated defect. The implantation of hUCMSC or hUCMSC seeded on a PRF scaffold is a novel method for mandible cartilage regeneration, and they showed better biomechanics in shear strength and elastic modulus.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1526-1533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825002222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825002222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景再生医学是治疗下颌软骨缺损的有效方法。然而,下颌髁突软骨缺损再生的生物力学方面仍然很少被讨论。目的分析人脐带间充质干细胞(hUCMSC)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)支架移植后动物模型下颌髁突软骨缺损再生的压缩、拉伸、剪切强度和弹性模量。材料与方法:80只新西兰大白兔下颌骨髁软骨缺损,分为4组(3个实验组,1个对照组)。实验组由PRF、hUCMSC和hUCMSC联合PRF治疗的缺损组成。每组5只大鼠,观察4周后安乐死。压缩、拉伸、剪切强度和弹性模量试验用万能试验机完成。采用SPSS v25软件进行比较分析。结果hUCMSC组抗压强度(13462±0.889)MPa,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.003);抗拉强度(2723±0.985)MPa,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.003)。平均抗剪强度和弹性模量显示,hUCMSC组(1162±0,090和8700±1502)和组合组(0,728±0,071和7742±0,814)显著高于其他组(p = 0,014和p = 0,014)。结论植入hUCMSC后缺损具有较高的抗压强度和抗拉强度。植入hUCMSC或在PRF支架上植入hUCMSC是一种新的下颌软骨再生方法,它们在剪切强度和弹性模量方面表现出更好的生物力学性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical analysis of mandibular cartilage defect regeneration after implantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and a platelet rich fibrin scaffold: an experimental animal study

Biomechanical analysis of mandibular cartilage defect regeneration after implantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and a platelet rich fibrin scaffold: an experimental animal study

Background

Regenerative medicine is therapy that is expected to be effective for mandibular cartilage defect regeneration. Nevertheless, the biomechanical aspects of mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration are still rarely discussed.

Objective

This study aimed too analyze the compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus in the mandibular condyle cartilage defect regeneration in an animal model after the implantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSC) and platelet rich fibrin (PRF) scaffolds. Materials and Methods: The defect were made on 80 New Zealand White Rabbit mandibular condyle cartilages and divided into four groups (three experimental and one control group). The experimental groups consisted of defects treated with implantations of PRF, hUCMSC, and hUCMSC with PRF. Each group consisted of 5 rats, observed for 4-weeks and then euthanized. Compression, tensile, shear strength, and elastic modulus tests were done with Universal Testing Machine. A comparative analysis was performed using SPSS v25 software.

Results

The hUCMSC group had a higher strength of compression (13,462 ± 0,889) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,000) and tensile strength (2723 ± 0,985) MPa with a significant difference (p = 0,003) than the other groups. The average shear strength and elastic modulus showed that the hUCMSC (1162 ± 0,090 and 8700 ± 1502) and combination groups (0,728 ± 0,071 and 7742 ± 0,814) have significantly higher values than the other groups (p = 0,014 and p = 0,000).

Conclusion

The implantation of hUCMSC results in a high compression and tensile strength of the regenerated defect. The implantation of hUCMSC or hUCMSC seeded on a PRF scaffold is a novel method for mandible cartilage regeneration, and they showed better biomechanics in shear strength and elastic modulus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
167 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信