在正畸治疗中，拔除前磨牙比不拔除前磨牙可减少牙弓宽度，但证据仍不一致

IF 4 4区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice Pub Date : 2025-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102198

IVAN ARSIC (Reviewers), ALEKSANDAR JAKOVLJEVIC, MILOS BELOICA

引用次数: 0

摘要

拔牙与非拔牙正畸治疗：系统综述和荟萃分析。Elias， KG, Sivamurthy， G, Bearn， DR. Angle Orthod 2024；94(1): 83 - 106。doi: 10.2319 / 021123 - 98.1。资金来源未报道。研究类型/设计系统评价，数据荟萃分析

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

PREMOLAR EXTRACTION MAY REDUCE ARCH WIDTH COMPARED TO NONEXTRACTION IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT, THOUGH EVIDENCE REMAINS INCONSISTENT

Article Title and Bibliographic Information

Extraction vs nonextraction orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Elias, KG, Sivamurthy, G, Bearn, DR. Angle Orthod 2024; 94(1):83-106. doi:10.2319/021123-98.1.

Source of Funding

Not reported.

Type of Study/Design

Systematic review with meta-analysis of data

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

16.70%

发文量

105

审稿时长

28 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.