Bilal Niazi BS , Matthew Vetrano BS , Ermin Tale BS , Jared Wilber BS , Samantha Sanger BS , Todd J Cohen MD
{"title":"癌症引起的心肺压力及相关治疗对心脏病患者心血管风险评分的影响:一项初步研究","authors":"Bilal Niazi BS , Matthew Vetrano BS , Ermin Tale BS , Jared Wilber BS , Samantha Sanger BS , Todd J Cohen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The predicting risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT) score has become a widely used tool to assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The improved calibration and inclusion of additional clinical and social variables make for comprehensive cardiac risk assessments compared to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 2013 risk estimator (ASCVD). Studies have shown an increased incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure in patients who are cancer survivors. However, no comparative studies have evaluated PREVENT and ASCVD risk scores in patients with a history of cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A six-year retrospective analysis (2019-2025) was performed using the Long Island Heart Rhythm Center electronic medical records. Patients were selected by keyword search including “malignancy,” “cancer,” and “neoplasm.” Patients with a history of cancer were then age and sex-matched to controls. PREVENT and ASCVD scores were calculated based on American Heart Association criteria. Statistical comparison was performed utilizing a paired t-test; p0.05 was statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>21 patients with oncologic diagnoses were identified, of which 5 were included (23.8%) based on data availability in their medical charts, along with age and sex-matched controls (n=5). Patient characteristics included a mean age of 63.85.9 years; M/F 0 [0%]/5 [100%]. Neoplasias identified included breast (1), lung (1), colon (1), pituitary (1), and thyroid (1). PREVENT scores for 10-year total CVD risk were 8.41% and 4.52% for cancer patients and controls, respectively (p=0.19). PREVENT scores for 30-year total CVD risk were 29.79% and 18.77% for cancer patients and controls, respectively (p=0.28). The 10-year ASCVD scores were 7.94% and 9.94% for patients with a history of cancer and controls, respectively (p=0.039).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated a dichotomy in results when comparing the PREVENT risk assessment to the ASCVD risk assessment in the same-aged population. Specifically, the PREVENT score was higher in patients with oncologic disorders as compared to controls. However, the ASCVD scores were lowered in those with a history of cancer. This study is limited due to its small sample size and retrospective design. A larger multicenter prospective study is needed in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101163"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTS OF CARDIOPULMONARY STRESS FROM CANCER AND ASSOCIATED TREATMENT ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK SCORE IN CARDIAC PATIENTS: A PILOT STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Bilal Niazi BS , Matthew Vetrano BS , Ermin Tale BS , Jared Wilber BS , Samantha Sanger BS , Todd J Cohen MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The predicting risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT) score has become a widely used tool to assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The improved calibration and inclusion of additional clinical and social variables make for comprehensive cardiac risk assessments compared to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 2013 risk estimator (ASCVD). Studies have shown an increased incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure in patients who are cancer survivors. However, no comparative studies have evaluated PREVENT and ASCVD risk scores in patients with a history of cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A six-year retrospective analysis (2019-2025) was performed using the Long Island Heart Rhythm Center electronic medical records. Patients were selected by keyword search including “malignancy,” “cancer,” and “neoplasm.” Patients with a history of cancer were then age and sex-matched to controls. PREVENT and ASCVD scores were calculated based on American Heart Association criteria. Statistical comparison was performed utilizing a paired t-test; p0.05 was statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>21 patients with oncologic diagnoses were identified, of which 5 were included (23.8%) based on data availability in their medical charts, along with age and sex-matched controls (n=5). Patient characteristics included a mean age of 63.85.9 years; M/F 0 [0%]/5 [100%]. Neoplasias identified included breast (1), lung (1), colon (1), pituitary (1), and thyroid (1). PREVENT scores for 10-year total CVD risk were 8.41% and 4.52% for cancer patients and controls, respectively (p=0.19). PREVENT scores for 30-year total CVD risk were 29.79% and 18.77% for cancer patients and controls, respectively (p=0.28). The 10-year ASCVD scores were 7.94% and 9.94% for patients with a history of cancer and controls, respectively (p=0.039).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated a dichotomy in results when comparing the PREVENT risk assessment to the ASCVD risk assessment in the same-aged population. Specifically, the PREVENT score was higher in patients with oncologic disorders as compared to controls. However, the ASCVD scores were lowered in those with a history of cancer. This study is limited due to its small sample size and retrospective design. A larger multicenter prospective study is needed in the future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725002387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725002387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
治疗领域ascvd /CVD在特殊人群中的应用背景预测心血管疾病事件风险(prevention)评分已成为一种广泛使用的评估心血管疾病(CVD)风险的工具。与2013年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评估器(ASCVD)相比,改进的校准和纳入额外的临床和社会变量可以进行全面的心脏风险评估。研究表明,在癌症幸存者中,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和心力衰竭的发病率增加。然而,没有比较研究评估有癌症病史的患者的预防和ASCVD风险评分。方法采用长岛心律中心电子病历进行6年(2019-2025)回顾性分析。通过“恶性肿瘤”、“癌症”、“肿瘤”等关键词来选择患者。然后将有癌症病史的患者的年龄和性别与对照组相匹配。预防和ASCVD评分是根据美国心脏协会的标准计算的。采用配对t检验进行统计学比较;P0.05差异有统计学意义。结果21例确诊为肿瘤患者,其中5例(23.8%)根据病历资料纳入,同时纳入年龄和性别匹配对照(n=5)。患者特征包括平均年龄63.85.9岁;M/ f 0[0%]/5[100%]。发现的肿瘤包括乳腺(1例)、肺(1例)、结肠(1例)、垂体(1例)和甲状腺(1例)。癌症患者和对照组10年心血管疾病总风险的预防评分分别为8.41%和4.52% (p=0.19)。癌症患者和对照组30年心血管疾病总风险的预防评分分别为29.79%和18.77% (p=0.28)。有癌症病史和对照组的10年ASCVD评分分别为7.94%和9.94% (p=0.039)。结论:本研究表明,在同一年龄人群中,prevention风险评估与ASCVD风险评估的结果存在两分法。具体来说,与对照组相比,肿瘤疾病患者的预防评分更高。然而,有癌症病史的人的ASCVD评分较低。本研究样本量小,采用回顾性设计,存在一定的局限性。未来需要更大规模的多中心前瞻性研究。
EFFECTS OF CARDIOPULMONARY STRESS FROM CANCER AND ASSOCIATED TREATMENT ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK SCORE IN CARDIAC PATIENTS: A PILOT STUDY
Therapeutic Area
ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations
Background
The predicting risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT) score has become a widely used tool to assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The improved calibration and inclusion of additional clinical and social variables make for comprehensive cardiac risk assessments compared to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 2013 risk estimator (ASCVD). Studies have shown an increased incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure in patients who are cancer survivors. However, no comparative studies have evaluated PREVENT and ASCVD risk scores in patients with a history of cancer.
Methods
A six-year retrospective analysis (2019-2025) was performed using the Long Island Heart Rhythm Center electronic medical records. Patients were selected by keyword search including “malignancy,” “cancer,” and “neoplasm.” Patients with a history of cancer were then age and sex-matched to controls. PREVENT and ASCVD scores were calculated based on American Heart Association criteria. Statistical comparison was performed utilizing a paired t-test; p0.05 was statistically significant.
Results
21 patients with oncologic diagnoses were identified, of which 5 were included (23.8%) based on data availability in their medical charts, along with age and sex-matched controls (n=5). Patient characteristics included a mean age of 63.85.9 years; M/F 0 [0%]/5 [100%]. Neoplasias identified included breast (1), lung (1), colon (1), pituitary (1), and thyroid (1). PREVENT scores for 10-year total CVD risk were 8.41% and 4.52% for cancer patients and controls, respectively (p=0.19). PREVENT scores for 30-year total CVD risk were 29.79% and 18.77% for cancer patients and controls, respectively (p=0.28). The 10-year ASCVD scores were 7.94% and 9.94% for patients with a history of cancer and controls, respectively (p=0.039).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated a dichotomy in results when comparing the PREVENT risk assessment to the ASCVD risk assessment in the same-aged population. Specifically, the PREVENT score was higher in patients with oncologic disorders as compared to controls. However, the ASCVD scores were lowered in those with a history of cancer. This study is limited due to its small sample size and retrospective design. A larger multicenter prospective study is needed in the future.