{"title":"推进可持续水资源管理中的群体决策:废水回用的z数增强框架","authors":"Hessam Najafi , Jinhui Jeanne Huang , Shima Shafie Naeibi , Mehrdad Ramazanilar , Vahid Nourani","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the face of global water scarcity, sustainable water resource management, such as treated wastewater reuse, is crucial. However, identifying optimal reuse alternatives presents significant challenges, primarily due to the complexities of decision-making under uncertainty, conflicting criteria, and varying expert judgments. This paper introduces a Group Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (GMADM) method enhanced with Z-numbers, a new generation of fuzzy logic that effectively manages uncertainties by incorporating data constraints and expert judgment reliability. A key contribution of this study is the development of a method to convert linguistic variables and pairwise comparisons into a Z-number-driven Decision Matrix (ZDM), improving the decision-making process in complex group scenarios. To address computational challenges, a simplified approach to calculating Z-numbers is proposed, which reduces computational costs.</div><div>The method is applied to a case study on Tabriz, Iran, a city facing significant water scarcity. Five wastewater reuse alternatives are evaluated based on nine sub-criteria spanning economic, technical, environmental, and social factors. The Z-number-driven GMADM method ranks alternatives using fuzzy Hausdorff distance (FHD) and relative closeness (RC) to ideal solutions. A comparison with traditional methods, such as the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), shows that industrial usage is ranked as the top alternative for wastewater reuse. The sensitivity analysis confirms that variations in expert opinion reliability significantly impact the rankings of alternatives, further validating the proposed method’s applicability in real-world decision-making scenarios, particularly in sustainable water resource management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134256"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing group decision-making in sustainable water resource management: a Z-number enhanced framework for wastewater reuse\",\"authors\":\"Hessam Najafi , Jinhui Jeanne Huang , Shima Shafie Naeibi , Mehrdad Ramazanilar , Vahid Nourani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the face of global water scarcity, sustainable water resource management, such as treated wastewater reuse, is crucial. However, identifying optimal reuse alternatives presents significant challenges, primarily due to the complexities of decision-making under uncertainty, conflicting criteria, and varying expert judgments. This paper introduces a Group Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (GMADM) method enhanced with Z-numbers, a new generation of fuzzy logic that effectively manages uncertainties by incorporating data constraints and expert judgment reliability. A key contribution of this study is the development of a method to convert linguistic variables and pairwise comparisons into a Z-number-driven Decision Matrix (ZDM), improving the decision-making process in complex group scenarios. To address computational challenges, a simplified approach to calculating Z-numbers is proposed, which reduces computational costs.</div><div>The method is applied to a case study on Tabriz, Iran, a city facing significant water scarcity. Five wastewater reuse alternatives are evaluated based on nine sub-criteria spanning economic, technical, environmental, and social factors. The Z-number-driven GMADM method ranks alternatives using fuzzy Hausdorff distance (FHD) and relative closeness (RC) to ideal solutions. A comparison with traditional methods, such as the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), shows that industrial usage is ranked as the top alternative for wastewater reuse. The sensitivity analysis confirms that variations in expert opinion reliability significantly impact the rankings of alternatives, further validating the proposed method’s applicability in real-world decision-making scenarios, particularly in sustainable water resource management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"663 \",\"pages\":\"Article 134256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425015963\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425015963","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing group decision-making in sustainable water resource management: a Z-number enhanced framework for wastewater reuse
In the face of global water scarcity, sustainable water resource management, such as treated wastewater reuse, is crucial. However, identifying optimal reuse alternatives presents significant challenges, primarily due to the complexities of decision-making under uncertainty, conflicting criteria, and varying expert judgments. This paper introduces a Group Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (GMADM) method enhanced with Z-numbers, a new generation of fuzzy logic that effectively manages uncertainties by incorporating data constraints and expert judgment reliability. A key contribution of this study is the development of a method to convert linguistic variables and pairwise comparisons into a Z-number-driven Decision Matrix (ZDM), improving the decision-making process in complex group scenarios. To address computational challenges, a simplified approach to calculating Z-numbers is proposed, which reduces computational costs.
The method is applied to a case study on Tabriz, Iran, a city facing significant water scarcity. Five wastewater reuse alternatives are evaluated based on nine sub-criteria spanning economic, technical, environmental, and social factors. The Z-number-driven GMADM method ranks alternatives using fuzzy Hausdorff distance (FHD) and relative closeness (RC) to ideal solutions. A comparison with traditional methods, such as the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), shows that industrial usage is ranked as the top alternative for wastewater reuse. The sensitivity analysis confirms that variations in expert opinion reliability significantly impact the rankings of alternatives, further validating the proposed method’s applicability in real-world decision-making scenarios, particularly in sustainable water resource management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.