{"title":"人工智能采用、员工抑郁和知识:企业社会责任如何缓冲心理影响","authors":"Byung-Jik Kim , Julak Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the psychological consequences of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in organizational contexts, focusing on how it impacts employee depression via the mediating and moderating mechanisms of job insecurity and corporate social responsibility (CSR), respectively. Adopting the broader Stress Process paradigm and employing an integrated theoretical framework that encompasses conservation of resources theory, social identity theory, and job demands-resources theory, we develop and empirically validate a moderated mediation framework utilizing longitudinal data gathered during three temporal intervals from 403 workers employed in South Korean enterprises. The empirical evidence demonstrates that although AI adoption does not directly impact employee depression, it exerts substantial indirect effects through the mediating pathway of job insecurity. Additionally, the analysis shows that CSR functions as a critical organizational resource that moderates the association between AI adoption and job insecurity; specifically, conditions of elevated CSR attenuate this positive association. These findings enhance theoretical understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying technological transformations in workplace settings and highlight the importance of strategic organizational initiatives in mitigating the mental health challenges associated with AI implementation. They also reveal actionable steps enterprises deploying AI technologies can take, highlighting the imperative of proactively managing workforce concerns regarding employment stability while sustaining robust CSR initiatives throughout periods of technological evolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 6","pages":"Article 100815"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI adoption, employee depression and knowledge: How corporate social responsibility buffers psychological impact\",\"authors\":\"Byung-Jik Kim , Julak Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the psychological consequences of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in organizational contexts, focusing on how it impacts employee depression via the mediating and moderating mechanisms of job insecurity and corporate social responsibility (CSR), respectively. Adopting the broader Stress Process paradigm and employing an integrated theoretical framework that encompasses conservation of resources theory, social identity theory, and job demands-resources theory, we develop and empirically validate a moderated mediation framework utilizing longitudinal data gathered during three temporal intervals from 403 workers employed in South Korean enterprises. The empirical evidence demonstrates that although AI adoption does not directly impact employee depression, it exerts substantial indirect effects through the mediating pathway of job insecurity. Additionally, the analysis shows that CSR functions as a critical organizational resource that moderates the association between AI adoption and job insecurity; specifically, conditions of elevated CSR attenuate this positive association. These findings enhance theoretical understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying technological transformations in workplace settings and highlight the importance of strategic organizational initiatives in mitigating the mental health challenges associated with AI implementation. They also reveal actionable steps enterprises deploying AI technologies can take, highlighting the imperative of proactively managing workforce concerns regarding employment stability while sustaining robust CSR initiatives throughout periods of technological evolution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2500160X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2500160X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
AI adoption, employee depression and knowledge: How corporate social responsibility buffers psychological impact
This study examines the psychological consequences of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in organizational contexts, focusing on how it impacts employee depression via the mediating and moderating mechanisms of job insecurity and corporate social responsibility (CSR), respectively. Adopting the broader Stress Process paradigm and employing an integrated theoretical framework that encompasses conservation of resources theory, social identity theory, and job demands-resources theory, we develop and empirically validate a moderated mediation framework utilizing longitudinal data gathered during three temporal intervals from 403 workers employed in South Korean enterprises. The empirical evidence demonstrates that although AI adoption does not directly impact employee depression, it exerts substantial indirect effects through the mediating pathway of job insecurity. Additionally, the analysis shows that CSR functions as a critical organizational resource that moderates the association between AI adoption and job insecurity; specifically, conditions of elevated CSR attenuate this positive association. These findings enhance theoretical understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying technological transformations in workplace settings and highlight the importance of strategic organizational initiatives in mitigating the mental health challenges associated with AI implementation. They also reveal actionable steps enterprises deploying AI technologies can take, highlighting the imperative of proactively managing workforce concerns regarding employment stability while sustaining robust CSR initiatives throughout periods of technological evolution.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.