Maria Akopyan, Matthew Genchev, Ellie E. Armstrong, Jazlyn A. Mooney
{"title":"参考基因组的选择损害了群体遗传分析","authors":"Maria Akopyan, Matthew Genchev, Ellie E. Armstrong, Jazlyn A. Mooney","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Characterizing genetic variation in natural populations is vital to evolutionary biology; however, many non-model species lack genomic resources. Here, we demonstrate that reference bias significantly affects population genomic analyses by mapping whole-genome sequence data from gray foxes (<em>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</em>) to a conspecific reference and two heterospecific canid genomes (dog and Arctic fox). Mapping to the conspecific genome improved read pairing by ∼5% and detected 26%–32% more SNPs and 33%–35% more singletons. Nucleotide diversity estimates increased by over 30%, <em>F</em><sub>ST</sub> increased from 0.189 to 0.197, and effective population size estimates were 30%–60% higher with the conspecific reference. Recombination rates varied by up to 3-fold at chromosome ends with heterospecific references. Importantly, <em>F</em><sub>ST</sub> outlier detection differed markedly, with heterospecific genomes identifying twice as many unique outlier windows. These findings highlight the impact of reference genome choice and the importance of conspecific genomic resources for accurate evolutionary inference.","PeriodicalId":9656,"journal":{"name":"Cell","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":42.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reference genome choice compromises population genetic analyses\",\"authors\":\"Maria Akopyan, Matthew Genchev, Ellie E. Armstrong, Jazlyn A. Mooney\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Characterizing genetic variation in natural populations is vital to evolutionary biology; however, many non-model species lack genomic resources. Here, we demonstrate that reference bias significantly affects population genomic analyses by mapping whole-genome sequence data from gray foxes (<em>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</em>) to a conspecific reference and two heterospecific canid genomes (dog and Arctic fox). Mapping to the conspecific genome improved read pairing by ∼5% and detected 26%–32% more SNPs and 33%–35% more singletons. Nucleotide diversity estimates increased by over 30%, <em>F</em><sub>ST</sub> increased from 0.189 to 0.197, and effective population size estimates were 30%–60% higher with the conspecific reference. Recombination rates varied by up to 3-fold at chromosome ends with heterospecific references. Importantly, <em>F</em><sub>ST</sub> outlier detection differed markedly, with heterospecific genomes identifying twice as many unique outlier windows. These findings highlight the impact of reference genome choice and the importance of conspecific genomic resources for accurate evolutionary inference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reference genome choice compromises population genetic analyses
Characterizing genetic variation in natural populations is vital to evolutionary biology; however, many non-model species lack genomic resources. Here, we demonstrate that reference bias significantly affects population genomic analyses by mapping whole-genome sequence data from gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) to a conspecific reference and two heterospecific canid genomes (dog and Arctic fox). Mapping to the conspecific genome improved read pairing by ∼5% and detected 26%–32% more SNPs and 33%–35% more singletons. Nucleotide diversity estimates increased by over 30%, FST increased from 0.189 to 0.197, and effective population size estimates were 30%–60% higher with the conspecific reference. Recombination rates varied by up to 3-fold at chromosome ends with heterospecific references. Importantly, FST outlier detection differed markedly, with heterospecific genomes identifying twice as many unique outlier windows. These findings highlight the impact of reference genome choice and the importance of conspecific genomic resources for accurate evolutionary inference.
期刊介绍:
Cells is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on cell biology, molecular biology, and biophysics. It is affiliated with several societies, including the Spanish Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (SEBBM), Nordic Autophagy Society (NAS), Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH), and Society for Regenerative Medicine (Russian Federation) (RPO).
The journal publishes research findings of significant importance in various areas of experimental biology, such as cell biology, molecular biology, neuroscience, immunology, virology, microbiology, cancer, human genetics, systems biology, signaling, and disease mechanisms and therapeutics. The primary criterion for considering papers is whether the results contribute to significant conceptual advances or raise thought-provoking questions and hypotheses related to interesting and important biological inquiries.
In addition to primary research articles presented in four formats, Cells also features review and opinion articles in its "leading edge" section, discussing recent research advancements and topics of interest to its wide readership.