测量和报告植物科学分支学科环境条件的重要性。

IF 6.9 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Christopher Vincent,Courtney P Leisner,Anna M Locke,Elena Pelech,Stephanie C Schmiege,Thomas D Sharkey,Mauricio Tejera-Nieves,Dorcas Olufunke Alade,Amanda A Cardoso,Ahram Cho,Kithmee De Silva,Nicole Dziedzic,Alison R Gill,Ravneet Kaur,Sarah L Lane,Gillian Zeng Michalczyk,Atinder Singh,Demissew Tesfaye Teshome
{"title":"测量和报告植物科学分支学科环境条件的重要性。","authors":"Christopher Vincent,Courtney P Leisner,Anna M Locke,Elena Pelech,Stephanie C Schmiege,Thomas D Sharkey,Mauricio Tejera-Nieves,Dorcas Olufunke Alade,Amanda A Cardoso,Ahram Cho,Kithmee De Silva,Nicole Dziedzic,Alison R Gill,Ravneet Kaur,Sarah L Lane,Gillian Zeng Michalczyk,Atinder Singh,Demissew Tesfaye Teshome","doi":"10.1093/plphys/kiaf405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding plant responses to the environment is based on research performed across several scales and subdisciplines. However, the interpretation and repeatability of experimental results depend on careful reporting of experimental procedures and environmental conditions. These conditions include light intensity and quality, temperature, relative humidity and vapor pressure deficit, soil water potential or volumetric water content, and pot size, which interact upon plant physiological responses across biological and experimental scales regardless of whether they are the focus of the experiment. To ascertain how effectively and consistently these conditions are reported, we reviewed greater than 200 plant science research articles published from 2020 through 2024 on vascular plants. Environmental condition data were often not reported, including cases where the specific environmental variable was the focus of the study. This situation hampers both replicability and interpretability of results and hinders progress in understanding plant physiological responses across subdisciplines. The Environmental and Ecological Plant Physiology section of the American Society of Plant Biologists (ASPB) recommends several best practices to measure and report environmental conditions in plant physiology experiments, such as measuring and reporting actual environmental conditions, especially of control variables, to enable replication and comparative interpretation among experiments. These guidelines can aid authors in experimental design and manuscript preparation and assist reviewers in evaluating submitted manuscripts. Following such guidelines will enhance the dynamic progress of sound plant science within our community by improving replicability and enabling cross-disciplinary interpretation of results.","PeriodicalId":20101,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of measuring and reporting environmental conditions across plant science subdisciplines.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Vincent,Courtney P Leisner,Anna M Locke,Elena Pelech,Stephanie C Schmiege,Thomas D Sharkey,Mauricio Tejera-Nieves,Dorcas Olufunke Alade,Amanda A Cardoso,Ahram Cho,Kithmee De Silva,Nicole Dziedzic,Alison R Gill,Ravneet Kaur,Sarah L Lane,Gillian Zeng Michalczyk,Atinder Singh,Demissew Tesfaye Teshome\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/plphys/kiaf405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding plant responses to the environment is based on research performed across several scales and subdisciplines. However, the interpretation and repeatability of experimental results depend on careful reporting of experimental procedures and environmental conditions. These conditions include light intensity and quality, temperature, relative humidity and vapor pressure deficit, soil water potential or volumetric water content, and pot size, which interact upon plant physiological responses across biological and experimental scales regardless of whether they are the focus of the experiment. To ascertain how effectively and consistently these conditions are reported, we reviewed greater than 200 plant science research articles published from 2020 through 2024 on vascular plants. Environmental condition data were often not reported, including cases where the specific environmental variable was the focus of the study. This situation hampers both replicability and interpretability of results and hinders progress in understanding plant physiological responses across subdisciplines. The Environmental and Ecological Plant Physiology section of the American Society of Plant Biologists (ASPB) recommends several best practices to measure and report environmental conditions in plant physiology experiments, such as measuring and reporting actual environmental conditions, especially of control variables, to enable replication and comparative interpretation among experiments. These guidelines can aid authors in experimental design and manuscript preparation and assist reviewers in evaluating submitted manuscripts. Following such guidelines will enhance the dynamic progress of sound plant science within our community by improving replicability and enabling cross-disciplinary interpretation of results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Physiology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf405\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解植物对环境的反应是基于跨几个尺度和分支学科进行的研究。然而,实验结果的解释和可重复性取决于对实验过程和环境条件的仔细报告。这些条件包括光照强度和质量、温度、相对湿度和蒸汽压亏缺、土壤水势或体积含水量以及盆栽大小,它们在生物和实验尺度上对植物的生理反应产生相互作用,而不管它们是否是实验的重点。为了确定这些条件的报道是否有效和一致,我们回顾了从2020年到2024年发表的200多篇关于维管植物的植物科学研究文章。环境条件数据通常没有报告,包括特定环境变量是研究重点的情况。这种情况既阻碍了结果的可重复性和可解释性,也阻碍了跨学科理解植物生理反应的进展。美国植物生物学家协会(ASPB)的环境与生态植物生理学分会推荐了几种在植物生理学实验中测量和报告环境条件的最佳实践,例如测量和报告实际环境条件,特别是控制变量,以便在实验之间进行复制和比较解释。这些指南可以帮助作者进行实验设计和稿件准备,并协助审稿人评估提交的稿件。遵循这些指导方针将通过提高可复制性和使结果的跨学科解释成为可能,促进我们社区内健全植物科学的动态进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Importance of measuring and reporting environmental conditions across plant science subdisciplines.
Understanding plant responses to the environment is based on research performed across several scales and subdisciplines. However, the interpretation and repeatability of experimental results depend on careful reporting of experimental procedures and environmental conditions. These conditions include light intensity and quality, temperature, relative humidity and vapor pressure deficit, soil water potential or volumetric water content, and pot size, which interact upon plant physiological responses across biological and experimental scales regardless of whether they are the focus of the experiment. To ascertain how effectively and consistently these conditions are reported, we reviewed greater than 200 plant science research articles published from 2020 through 2024 on vascular plants. Environmental condition data were often not reported, including cases where the specific environmental variable was the focus of the study. This situation hampers both replicability and interpretability of results and hinders progress in understanding plant physiological responses across subdisciplines. The Environmental and Ecological Plant Physiology section of the American Society of Plant Biologists (ASPB) recommends several best practices to measure and report environmental conditions in plant physiology experiments, such as measuring and reporting actual environmental conditions, especially of control variables, to enable replication and comparative interpretation among experiments. These guidelines can aid authors in experimental design and manuscript preparation and assist reviewers in evaluating submitted manuscripts. Following such guidelines will enhance the dynamic progress of sound plant science within our community by improving replicability and enabling cross-disciplinary interpretation of results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Physiology
Plant Physiology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Plant Physiology® is a distinguished and highly respected journal with a rich history dating back to its establishment in 1926. It stands as a leading international publication in the field of plant biology, covering a comprehensive range of topics from the molecular and structural aspects of plant life to systems biology and ecophysiology. Recognized as the most highly cited journal in plant sciences, Plant Physiology® is a testament to its commitment to excellence and the dissemination of groundbreaking research. As the official publication of the American Society of Plant Biologists, Plant Physiology® upholds rigorous peer-review standards, ensuring that the scientific community receives the highest quality research. The journal releases 12 issues annually, providing a steady stream of new findings and insights to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信