心力衰竭治疗的全国实施:中国国家心力衰竭中心认证计划(HF-CAP)。

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jingmin Zhou,Xuejuan Jin,Yamei Xu,Zhonglei Xie,Xiaotong Cui,Yanyan Wang,Hua Wang,Xinli Li,Yugang Dong,Yuhua Liao,Weimin Li,Alexandre Mebazaa,Jiefu Yang,Junbo Ge,
{"title":"心力衰竭治疗的全国实施:中国国家心力衰竭中心认证计划(HF-CAP)。","authors":"Jingmin Zhou,Xuejuan Jin,Yamei Xu,Zhonglei Xie,Xiaotong Cui,Yanyan Wang,Hua Wang,Xinli Li,Yugang Dong,Yuhua Liao,Weimin Li,Alexandre Mebazaa,Jiefu Yang,Junbo Ge, ","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nImplementing optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is still challenging in patients with heart failure (HF). This prospective study assessed the benefits of large-scale, nationwide, multi-annual implementation of HF therapies in China.\r\n\r\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\r\nThis longitudinal, pre-post comparison design included patients in hospitals accredited by the National Heart Failure Center Accreditation Program (HF-CAP). Patients were divided into four groups: 6-12 months before accreditation (Pre); >0 -≤12 months after accreditation (Y1); >12-≤24 months after accreditation (Y2), and >24 months after accreditation (Y2+). The primary endpoint was 1-year composite HF readmission and/or cardiovascular death. Secondary endpoints included 1-year HF readmission alone, 1-year cardiovascular death alone, and association between phone calls and/or visits and outcomes. Overall, 408 073 patients with HF from 646 centres were included. After HF-CAP accreditation, more patients with HF were treated following discharge. Compared with the Pre group, risk of meeting the primary endpoint decreased in Y1 and was incrementally lower in Y2 and Y2+: fully adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.893 (0.871-0.916), 0.855 (0.830-0.880) and 0.720 (0.695-0.745), respectively (all p < 0.0001). Risk of HF readmission alone reduced from Y1 onwards (OR 0.865 [95% CI 0.841-0.891]). Risk of cardiovascular death reduced from Y2 onwards (OR 0.942 [95% CI 0.904-0.983]). Phone calls had little association with patient outcomes; however, face-to-face visits reduced risk of cardiovascular death (OR 0.624 [95% CI 0.597-0.651]).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nGuideline-directed medical therapy implementation and follow-up after HF hospitalization was achievable in ~400 000 patients and was associated with cardiovascular benefits 1-year post-initiation.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide implementation of heart failure therapies: National Heart Failure Center Accreditation Program (HF-CAP) in China.\",\"authors\":\"Jingmin Zhou,Xuejuan Jin,Yamei Xu,Zhonglei Xie,Xiaotong Cui,Yanyan Wang,Hua Wang,Xinli Li,Yugang Dong,Yuhua Liao,Weimin Li,Alexandre Mebazaa,Jiefu Yang,Junbo Ge, \",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.70035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\r\\nImplementing optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is still challenging in patients with heart failure (HF). This prospective study assessed the benefits of large-scale, nationwide, multi-annual implementation of HF therapies in China.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\\r\\nThis longitudinal, pre-post comparison design included patients in hospitals accredited by the National Heart Failure Center Accreditation Program (HF-CAP). Patients were divided into four groups: 6-12 months before accreditation (Pre); >0 -≤12 months after accreditation (Y1); >12-≤24 months after accreditation (Y2), and >24 months after accreditation (Y2+). The primary endpoint was 1-year composite HF readmission and/or cardiovascular death. Secondary endpoints included 1-year HF readmission alone, 1-year cardiovascular death alone, and association between phone calls and/or visits and outcomes. Overall, 408 073 patients with HF from 646 centres were included. After HF-CAP accreditation, more patients with HF were treated following discharge. Compared with the Pre group, risk of meeting the primary endpoint decreased in Y1 and was incrementally lower in Y2 and Y2+: fully adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.893 (0.871-0.916), 0.855 (0.830-0.880) and 0.720 (0.695-0.745), respectively (all p < 0.0001). Risk of HF readmission alone reduced from Y1 onwards (OR 0.865 [95% CI 0.841-0.891]). Risk of cardiovascular death reduced from Y2 onwards (OR 0.942 [95% CI 0.904-0.983]). Phone calls had little association with patient outcomes; however, face-to-face visits reduced risk of cardiovascular death (OR 0.624 [95% CI 0.597-0.651]).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nGuideline-directed medical therapy implementation and follow-up after HF hospitalization was achievable in ~400 000 patients and was associated with cardiovascular benefits 1-year post-initiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在心力衰竭(HF)患者中实施最佳的指导药物治疗仍然具有挑战性。这项前瞻性研究评估了在中国大规模、全国性、每年多次实施心衰治疗的益处。方法和结果这项纵向、前后比较设计纳入了国家心力衰竭中心认证计划(HF-CAP)认可的医院的患者。患者分为四组:前6-12个月(Pre);>0 -认证后≤12个月(Y1);>认证后12-≤24个月(Y2), >认证后24个月(Y2+)。主要终点是1年合并心衰再入院和/或心血管死亡。次要终点包括1年心力衰竭再入院,1年心血管死亡,以及电话和/或就诊与预后的关系。总共纳入了来自646个中心的408073例心衰患者。在HF- cap认证后,更多的HF患者在出院后接受治疗。与Pre组相比,Y1组达到主要终点的风险降低,Y2组和Y2+组达到主要终点的风险逐渐降低:完全调整的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(ci)分别为0.893(0.871-0.916)、0.855(0.830-0.880)和0.720(0.695-0.745)(均p < 0.0001)。仅HF再入院的风险从1岁开始降低(OR 0.865 [95% CI 0.841-0.891])。心血管死亡风险从Y2开始降低(OR 0.942 [95% CI 0.904-0.983])。打电话与病人的预后关系不大;然而,面对面访问降低了心血管死亡风险(OR 0.624 [95% CI 0.597-0.651])。结论:约40万例心衰患者住院后可实现指南指导的药物治疗实施和随访,并在开始治疗后1年心血管获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationwide implementation of heart failure therapies: National Heart Failure Center Accreditation Program (HF-CAP) in China.
AIMS Implementing optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is still challenging in patients with heart failure (HF). This prospective study assessed the benefits of large-scale, nationwide, multi-annual implementation of HF therapies in China. METHODS AND RESULTS This longitudinal, pre-post comparison design included patients in hospitals accredited by the National Heart Failure Center Accreditation Program (HF-CAP). Patients were divided into four groups: 6-12 months before accreditation (Pre); >0 -≤12 months after accreditation (Y1); >12-≤24 months after accreditation (Y2), and >24 months after accreditation (Y2+). The primary endpoint was 1-year composite HF readmission and/or cardiovascular death. Secondary endpoints included 1-year HF readmission alone, 1-year cardiovascular death alone, and association between phone calls and/or visits and outcomes. Overall, 408 073 patients with HF from 646 centres were included. After HF-CAP accreditation, more patients with HF were treated following discharge. Compared with the Pre group, risk of meeting the primary endpoint decreased in Y1 and was incrementally lower in Y2 and Y2+: fully adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.893 (0.871-0.916), 0.855 (0.830-0.880) and 0.720 (0.695-0.745), respectively (all p < 0.0001). Risk of HF readmission alone reduced from Y1 onwards (OR 0.865 [95% CI 0.841-0.891]). Risk of cardiovascular death reduced from Y2 onwards (OR 0.942 [95% CI 0.904-0.983]). Phone calls had little association with patient outcomes; however, face-to-face visits reduced risk of cardiovascular death (OR 0.624 [95% CI 0.597-0.651]). CONCLUSIONS Guideline-directed medical therapy implementation and follow-up after HF hospitalization was achievable in ~400 000 patients and was associated with cardiovascular benefits 1-year post-initiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信