Martin Matre, Truls Johansen, Sveinung Tornås, Anne Catrine Trægde Martinsen, Alexander Olsen, Anne Lund, Frank Becker, Cathrine Brunborg, Jacoba M Spikman, Jennie Ponsford, Dawn Neumann, Skye McDonald, Marianne Løvstad
{"title":"挪威语版社会推理意识测验的信度和效度。","authors":"Martin Matre, Truls Johansen, Sveinung Tornås, Anne Catrine Trægde Martinsen, Alexander Olsen, Anne Lund, Frank Becker, Cathrine Brunborg, Jacoba M Spikman, Jennie Ponsford, Dawn Neumann, Skye McDonald, Marianne Løvstad","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2558872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To establish reliability and construct validity of a Norwegian version of the social cognition test, the Awareness of Social Inference Test (N-TASIT). Participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI; n = 101) and 50 matched healthy controls performed either a virtual reality (VR) or 2D version of N-TASIT at baseline and 16 weeks later. Reliability measures were test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha (α) were calculated for the overall sample and both groups separately. Construct validity was tested with known groups validity, convergent and discriminant validity. Known groups analysis was conducted for both versions separately and combined. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by associations between N-TASIT and established measures of social cognition and with measures of cognition, emotional distress and fatigue. ICC for the total sample was 0.63 (95% CI 0.49-0.73), and α was 0.88, when presentation modes (VR and 2D) were combined. The healthy control group outperformed the TBI group in both presentation modes. Medium-to-large associations were found between N-TASIT performance and social cognitive measures, and mostly weak or no significant correlations with non-social domains. N-TASIT appears psychometrically sound and comparable to the original. The influence of presentation mode on performance remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the awareness of social inference test.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Matre, Truls Johansen, Sveinung Tornås, Anne Catrine Trægde Martinsen, Alexander Olsen, Anne Lund, Frank Becker, Cathrine Brunborg, Jacoba M Spikman, Jennie Ponsford, Dawn Neumann, Skye McDonald, Marianne Løvstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2025.2558872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To establish reliability and construct validity of a Norwegian version of the social cognition test, the Awareness of Social Inference Test (N-TASIT). Participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI; n = 101) and 50 matched healthy controls performed either a virtual reality (VR) or 2D version of N-TASIT at baseline and 16 weeks later. Reliability measures were test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha (α) were calculated for the overall sample and both groups separately. Construct validity was tested with known groups validity, convergent and discriminant validity. Known groups analysis was conducted for both versions separately and combined. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by associations between N-TASIT and established measures of social cognition and with measures of cognition, emotional distress and fatigue. ICC for the total sample was 0.63 (95% CI 0.49-0.73), and α was 0.88, when presentation modes (VR and 2D) were combined. The healthy control group outperformed the TBI group in both presentation modes. Medium-to-large associations were found between N-TASIT performance and social cognitive measures, and mostly weak or no significant correlations with non-social domains. N-TASIT appears psychometrically sound and comparable to the original. The influence of presentation mode on performance remains unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2558872\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2558872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
建立挪威版社会认知测验——社会推理意识测验(N-TASIT)的信度和效度。创伤性脑损伤(TBI; n = 101)和50名匹配的健康对照者在基线和16周后分别进行虚拟现实(VR)或二维n - tasit测试。信度测量包括重测信度和内部一致性。对整个样本和两组分别计算类内相关性(ICC)和Cronbach’s alpha (α)。构念效度以已知组效度、收敛效度和判别效度进行检验。对两个版本分别和合并进行已知组分析。N-TASIT与既定社会认知测量、认知测量、情绪困扰和疲劳测量之间的关联决定了收敛效度和区别效度。当合并呈现模式(VR和2D)时,总样本的ICC为0.63 (95% CI 0.49-0.73), α为0.88。健康对照组在两种表现方式上均优于TBI组。N-TASIT表现与社会认知测量之间存在中大型关联,而与非社会领域的相关性大多较弱或不显著。N-TASIT在心理测量学上是合理的,与原版相当。呈现方式对业绩的影响尚不清楚。
Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the awareness of social inference test.
To establish reliability and construct validity of a Norwegian version of the social cognition test, the Awareness of Social Inference Test (N-TASIT). Participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI; n = 101) and 50 matched healthy controls performed either a virtual reality (VR) or 2D version of N-TASIT at baseline and 16 weeks later. Reliability measures were test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha (α) were calculated for the overall sample and both groups separately. Construct validity was tested with known groups validity, convergent and discriminant validity. Known groups analysis was conducted for both versions separately and combined. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by associations between N-TASIT and established measures of social cognition and with measures of cognition, emotional distress and fatigue. ICC for the total sample was 0.63 (95% CI 0.49-0.73), and α was 0.88, when presentation modes (VR and 2D) were combined. The healthy control group outperformed the TBI group in both presentation modes. Medium-to-large associations were found between N-TASIT performance and social cognitive measures, and mostly weak or no significant correlations with non-social domains. N-TASIT appears psychometrically sound and comparable to the original. The influence of presentation mode on performance remains unclear.
期刊介绍:
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.