引导行为改变:从数字多重健康行为干预试验期间个人自行编写的提示中获得的见解。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elizabeth S. Collier , Elin A. Karlsson , Joel Crawford , Preben Bendtsen , Marcus Bendtsen
{"title":"引导行为改变:从数字多重健康行为干预试验期间个人自行编写的提示中获得的见解。","authors":"Elizabeth S. Collier ,&nbsp;Elin A. Karlsson ,&nbsp;Joel Crawford ,&nbsp;Preben Bendtsen ,&nbsp;Marcus Bendtsen","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital multiple health behaviour interventions could reduce the prevalence of behavioural risk factors for several non-communicable diseases, but their design could be improved through better understanding of how individuals navigate behavioural change. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study evaluated 2657 prompts that were written by individuals (N = 722) for their personal use while taking part in a digital multiple health behaviour intervention trial. This unique data reflects individuals’ thoughts and feelings whilst actively trying to change, rather than post-hoc descriptions or explanations thereof. Inductive qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the prompts and extract themes within the material; then correspondence analysis was used to test whether these themes manifested differently across four behavioural categories (alcohol consumption, tobacco use, healthy diet, physical activity). Six main themes, each with subthemes, were identified (Encouragement &amp; Motivation, Implementing Change, Self-Focus, Mindset, Negotiation Style, and Specific Motives), which reflect nuances in the concept of self-regulation and align well with behavioural change theory. People favoured different approaches to change depending on the target behavioural category, which were broadly discriminated by dimensions of action vs inaction and external/impersonal vs internal/personal focus. This work reveals the various ways individuals approach and navigate changing their health behaviours. Inclusion of self-authoring modules in digital interventions may offer individuals an opportunity to develop skills and know-how gained through intervention engagement, and remind themselves of personal reasons to change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118599"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating behavioural change: insights from prompts self-authored by individuals during a digital multiple health behaviour intervention trial\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth S. Collier ,&nbsp;Elin A. Karlsson ,&nbsp;Joel Crawford ,&nbsp;Preben Bendtsen ,&nbsp;Marcus Bendtsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Digital multiple health behaviour interventions could reduce the prevalence of behavioural risk factors for several non-communicable diseases, but their design could be improved through better understanding of how individuals navigate behavioural change. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study evaluated 2657 prompts that were written by individuals (N = 722) for their personal use while taking part in a digital multiple health behaviour intervention trial. This unique data reflects individuals’ thoughts and feelings whilst actively trying to change, rather than post-hoc descriptions or explanations thereof. Inductive qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the prompts and extract themes within the material; then correspondence analysis was used to test whether these themes manifested differently across four behavioural categories (alcohol consumption, tobacco use, healthy diet, physical activity). Six main themes, each with subthemes, were identified (Encouragement &amp; Motivation, Implementing Change, Self-Focus, Mindset, Negotiation Style, and Specific Motives), which reflect nuances in the concept of self-regulation and align well with behavioural change theory. People favoured different approaches to change depending on the target behavioural category, which were broadly discriminated by dimensions of action vs inaction and external/impersonal vs internal/personal focus. This work reveals the various ways individuals approach and navigate changing their health behaviours. Inclusion of self-authoring modules in digital interventions may offer individuals an opportunity to develop skills and know-how gained through intervention engagement, and remind themselves of personal reasons to change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"384 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500930X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500930X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字多种健康行为干预措施可以减少几种非传染性疾病的行为风险因素的流行,但可以通过更好地了解个人如何应对行为改变来改进其设计。本研究采用混合方法,评估了2657份个人(N = 722)在参加数字多重健康行为干预试验时为个人使用而编写的提示。这种独特的数据反映了个人在积极尝试改变时的想法和感受,而不是事后的描述或解释。采用归纳定性分析的方法对提示进行评价,提取材料中的主题;然后使用对应分析来测试这些主题在四种行为类别(饮酒、吸烟、健康饮食、体育活动)中是否表现不同。确定了六个主题,每个主题都有副主题(鼓励与动机,实施变革,自我关注,心态,谈判风格和特定动机),它们反映了自我调节概念的细微差别,并与行为改变理论很好地吻合。根据目标行为类别,人们倾向于不同的改变方法,这些方法被广泛地区分为行动与不作为以及外部/非个人与内部/个人关注的维度。这项工作揭示了个人处理和导航改变其健康行为的各种方式。在数字干预措施中纳入自我创作模块,可以为个人提供机会,发展通过参与干预措施获得的技能和知识,并提醒自己改变的个人原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating behavioural change: insights from prompts self-authored by individuals during a digital multiple health behaviour intervention trial
Digital multiple health behaviour interventions could reduce the prevalence of behavioural risk factors for several non-communicable diseases, but their design could be improved through better understanding of how individuals navigate behavioural change. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study evaluated 2657 prompts that were written by individuals (N = 722) for their personal use while taking part in a digital multiple health behaviour intervention trial. This unique data reflects individuals’ thoughts and feelings whilst actively trying to change, rather than post-hoc descriptions or explanations thereof. Inductive qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the prompts and extract themes within the material; then correspondence analysis was used to test whether these themes manifested differently across four behavioural categories (alcohol consumption, tobacco use, healthy diet, physical activity). Six main themes, each with subthemes, were identified (Encouragement & Motivation, Implementing Change, Self-Focus, Mindset, Negotiation Style, and Specific Motives), which reflect nuances in the concept of self-regulation and align well with behavioural change theory. People favoured different approaches to change depending on the target behavioural category, which were broadly discriminated by dimensions of action vs inaction and external/impersonal vs internal/personal focus. This work reveals the various ways individuals approach and navigate changing their health behaviours. Inclusion of self-authoring modules in digital interventions may offer individuals an opportunity to develop skills and know-how gained through intervention engagement, and remind themselves of personal reasons to change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信