职业平衡问卷11-中文版的心理测量特征。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Yun-Ling Chen, Pei-Chi Su, Wei-Ting Ko, Ming-Hong Hsieh, Po-Chung Ju, Yung-Teng Chan, Petra Wagman, Carita Håkansson
{"title":"职业平衡问卷11-中文版的心理测量特征。","authors":"Yun-Ling Chen, Pei-Chi Su, Wei-Ting Ko, Ming-Hong Hsieh, Po-Chung Ju, Yung-Teng Chan, Petra Wagman, Carita Håkansson","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2025.2559893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational balance (OB) is a subjective feeling of having the right amount and variety of occupations.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The study aims to translate the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11) into Chinese (OBQ11-C) and to examine its psychometric properties for people with depression in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Material/methods: </strong>The OBQ11 was translated and reviewed by 10 experts. Subjects with depression were referred from two psychiatric outpatient clinic in central Taiwan. Cognitive debriefing involved 10 subjects, while 161 subjects (average age = 39.2 ± 14.0, 66.5% female) were assessed for reliability and validity using classical test theory by PASW 20.0 and Rasch analysis by Winsteps 5.3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OBQ11-C showed good content validity, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90), item-total correlation (0.49-0.77) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90). Rasch analysis results supported the four-point Likert scale, unidimensionality, item separation (3.95), item reliability (0.94), person separation (2.87) and person reliability (0.89), and may have cultural and population differences compared with other language versions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OBQ11-C is a valid tool for assessing OB in Chinese-speaking individuals, particularly those with depression in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study validates a tool designed to assess OB as a foundation for creating individualised, occupation-based programmes for individuals with depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"32 1","pages":"2559893"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11-Chinese version.\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Ling Chen, Pei-Chi Su, Wei-Ting Ko, Ming-Hong Hsieh, Po-Chung Ju, Yung-Teng Chan, Petra Wagman, Carita Håkansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11038128.2025.2559893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational balance (OB) is a subjective feeling of having the right amount and variety of occupations.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The study aims to translate the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11) into Chinese (OBQ11-C) and to examine its psychometric properties for people with depression in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Material/methods: </strong>The OBQ11 was translated and reviewed by 10 experts. Subjects with depression were referred from two psychiatric outpatient clinic in central Taiwan. Cognitive debriefing involved 10 subjects, while 161 subjects (average age = 39.2 ± 14.0, 66.5% female) were assessed for reliability and validity using classical test theory by PASW 20.0 and Rasch analysis by Winsteps 5.3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OBQ11-C showed good content validity, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90), item-total correlation (0.49-0.77) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90). Rasch analysis results supported the four-point Likert scale, unidimensionality, item separation (3.95), item reliability (0.94), person separation (2.87) and person reliability (0.89), and may have cultural and population differences compared with other language versions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OBQ11-C is a valid tool for assessing OB in Chinese-speaking individuals, particularly those with depression in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study validates a tool designed to assess OB as a foundation for creating individualised, occupation-based programmes for individuals with depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"2559893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2025.2559893\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2025.2559893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:职业平衡(Occupational balance, OB)是一种主观感觉,即拥有适当数量和种类的职业。目的/目的:本研究旨在将职业平衡问卷(OBQ11)翻译成中文(OBQ11- c),并研究其在台湾抑郁症患者中的心理测量特性。材料/方法:OBQ11由10位专家翻译审阅。忧郁症患者来自台湾中部两间精神科门诊。采用PASW 20.0的经典检验理论和Winsteps 5.3.0的Rasch分析对161名被试进行信度和效度评估,平均年龄为39.2±14.0,其中女性占66.5%。结果:OBQ11-C具有较好的内容效度、内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90)、项目-总相关(0.49 ~ 0.77)和重测信度(类内相关系数= 0.90)。Rasch分析结果支持李克特四点量表、单维性、项目分离(3.95)、项目信度(0.94)、人分离(2.87)和人信度(0.89),与其他语言版本相比可能存在文化和人群差异。结论:OBQ11-C是评估华语个体,尤其是台湾忧郁症患者OB的有效工具。意义:本研究验证了一种用于评估OB的工具,该工具可作为为抑郁症患者创建个性化、基于职业的方案的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11-Chinese version.

Background: Occupational balance (OB) is a subjective feeling of having the right amount and variety of occupations.

Aims/objectives: The study aims to translate the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11) into Chinese (OBQ11-C) and to examine its psychometric properties for people with depression in Taiwan.

Material/methods: The OBQ11 was translated and reviewed by 10 experts. Subjects with depression were referred from two psychiatric outpatient clinic in central Taiwan. Cognitive debriefing involved 10 subjects, while 161 subjects (average age = 39.2 ± 14.0, 66.5% female) were assessed for reliability and validity using classical test theory by PASW 20.0 and Rasch analysis by Winsteps 5.3.0.

Results: The OBQ11-C showed good content validity, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90), item-total correlation (0.49-0.77) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90). Rasch analysis results supported the four-point Likert scale, unidimensionality, item separation (3.95), item reliability (0.94), person separation (2.87) and person reliability (0.89), and may have cultural and population differences compared with other language versions.

Conclusions: The OBQ11-C is a valid tool for assessing OB in Chinese-speaking individuals, particularly those with depression in Taiwan.

Significance: This study validates a tool designed to assess OB as a foundation for creating individualised, occupation-based programmes for individuals with depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信