Annelien Dorme , Yana Criel , Kurt Eggers , Evy Woumans , Arnaud Szmalec , Miet De Letter
{"title":"双语口吃成人的亚词汇言语感知和注意网络:一项行为和电生理研究。","authors":"Annelien Dorme , Yana Criel , Kurt Eggers , Evy Woumans , Arnaud Szmalec , Miet De Letter","doi":"10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Several studies show that adults who stutter have deficient auditory perception and attentional control. Moreover, these studies tend to focus on monolinguals, whereas both stuttering and bilingualism seem to have implications for these processes. This study aimed (1) to compare sublexical speech perception and nonlinguistic, nonauditory attention networks between bilingual adults who stutter (BAWS) and who do not stutter (BANS) and (2) to explore to which extent second language (L2) proficiency influences these processes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Thirteen BAWS and thirteen BANS were enrolled in an electrophysiological protocol using an inattentive (MMN) and an attentive auditory oddball paradigm (P300) containing a phonemic contrast (place of articulation). The Attention Network Test (ANT) was administered as a behavioral measure of attentional control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>(1) The amplitude and onset latency of the MMN and P300 effect did not differ between BAWS and BANS, but BAWS did not show a typical differentiation between standard and deviant syllables as measured by the P2. Behaviorally, BAWS displayed a less efficient alerting network and executive attention network. (2) L2 proficiency had no significant effect on sublexical speech perception, but was negatively associated with executive attention in BAWS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest that BAWS display difficulties in maintaining an alert state and inhibiting irrelevant and selecting relevant information, rather than selecting information from sensory input. In sensory processing, BAWS showed an atypical pattern compared to BANS, but no disparities in phoneme discrimination or categorization, regardless of an inattentive or attentive listening mode. Lastly, L2 proficiency influenced nonlinguistic, nonauditory attention in BAWS, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive research on bilingual profiles in people who stutter.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 106160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublexical speech perception and attention networks in bilingual adults who stutter: A behavioral and electrophysiological study\",\"authors\":\"Annelien Dorme , Yana Criel , Kurt Eggers , Evy Woumans , Arnaud Szmalec , Miet De Letter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Several studies show that adults who stutter have deficient auditory perception and attentional control. Moreover, these studies tend to focus on monolinguals, whereas both stuttering and bilingualism seem to have implications for these processes. This study aimed (1) to compare sublexical speech perception and nonlinguistic, nonauditory attention networks between bilingual adults who stutter (BAWS) and who do not stutter (BANS) and (2) to explore to which extent second language (L2) proficiency influences these processes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Thirteen BAWS and thirteen BANS were enrolled in an electrophysiological protocol using an inattentive (MMN) and an attentive auditory oddball paradigm (P300) containing a phonemic contrast (place of articulation). The Attention Network Test (ANT) was administered as a behavioral measure of attentional control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>(1) The amplitude and onset latency of the MMN and P300 effect did not differ between BAWS and BANS, but BAWS did not show a typical differentiation between standard and deviant syllables as measured by the P2. Behaviorally, BAWS displayed a less efficient alerting network and executive attention network. (2) L2 proficiency had no significant effect on sublexical speech perception, but was negatively associated with executive attention in BAWS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest that BAWS display difficulties in maintaining an alert state and inhibiting irrelevant and selecting relevant information, rather than selecting information from sensory input. In sensory processing, BAWS showed an atypical pattern compared to BANS, but no disparities in phoneme discrimination or categorization, regardless of an inattentive or attentive listening mode. Lastly, L2 proficiency influenced nonlinguistic, nonauditory attention in BAWS, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive research on bilingual profiles in people who stutter.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fluency Disorders\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fluency Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X25000622\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X25000622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sublexical speech perception and attention networks in bilingual adults who stutter: A behavioral and electrophysiological study
Purpose
Several studies show that adults who stutter have deficient auditory perception and attentional control. Moreover, these studies tend to focus on monolinguals, whereas both stuttering and bilingualism seem to have implications for these processes. This study aimed (1) to compare sublexical speech perception and nonlinguistic, nonauditory attention networks between bilingual adults who stutter (BAWS) and who do not stutter (BANS) and (2) to explore to which extent second language (L2) proficiency influences these processes.
Method
Thirteen BAWS and thirteen BANS were enrolled in an electrophysiological protocol using an inattentive (MMN) and an attentive auditory oddball paradigm (P300) containing a phonemic contrast (place of articulation). The Attention Network Test (ANT) was administered as a behavioral measure of attentional control.
Results
(1) The amplitude and onset latency of the MMN and P300 effect did not differ between BAWS and BANS, but BAWS did not show a typical differentiation between standard and deviant syllables as measured by the P2. Behaviorally, BAWS displayed a less efficient alerting network and executive attention network. (2) L2 proficiency had no significant effect on sublexical speech perception, but was negatively associated with executive attention in BAWS.
Conclusions
These results suggest that BAWS display difficulties in maintaining an alert state and inhibiting irrelevant and selecting relevant information, rather than selecting information from sensory input. In sensory processing, BAWS showed an atypical pattern compared to BANS, but no disparities in phoneme discrimination or categorization, regardless of an inattentive or attentive listening mode. Lastly, L2 proficiency influenced nonlinguistic, nonauditory attention in BAWS, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive research on bilingual profiles in people who stutter.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Fluency Disorders provides comprehensive coverage of clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects of stuttering, including the latest remediation techniques. As the official journal of the International Fluency Association, the journal features full-length research and clinical reports; methodological, theoretical and philosophical articles; reviews; short communications and much more – all readily accessible and tailored to the needs of the professional.