分离手术(SS)和高级放疗(RT)在转移性硬膜外脊髓压迫(MESCC)中的作用:一项比较SBRT和3D-CRT的单中心回顾性研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giuseppina Bevacqua, Valentina Grespi, Eleonora Becattini, Matteo M Ottaviani, Fabio Trippa, Carlo Conti
{"title":"分离手术(SS)和高级放疗(RT)在转移性硬膜外脊髓压迫(MESCC)中的作用:一项比较SBRT和3D-CRT的单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Giuseppina Bevacqua, Valentina Grespi, Eleonora Becattini, Matteo M Ottaviani, Fabio Trippa, Carlo Conti","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) after Separation Surgery (SS), focusing on local disease control (LC) and overall survival (OS), in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 30 patients diagnosed with MESCC and treated with SS, followed by either SBRT (n=14) or 3D-CRT (n=16). Surgical intervention included laminectomy and tumor decompression to achieve a 2-3 mm margin. Postoperatively, patients received either hypofractionated SBRT (20-40 Gy in 2-5 fractions) or conventional 3D-CRT (16-30 Gy in 2-10 fractions). Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 64.6 years (range: 31-84), with a predominance of male patients (60%). The most common primary tumors were non-small cell lung cancer (20%) and renal cell carcinoma (20%). At 12 months, LC was significantly higher in the SBRT group (92.3%) compared to the 3D-CRT group (53.3%) (p=0.01). OS at 6, 12 and 15 months was superior in the SBRT cohort (92.8%, 71.4%, 84.6%) compared to the 3D-CRT cohort (53.3%, 40%, 13.3%), with a significant difference in favour of SBRT (p=0.009). SBRT was associated with lower local recurrence rates and better disease control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of SS and SBRT has been demonstrated to result in superior OS and LC outcomes in comparison to 3D-CRT. While the presence of visceral metastases remains a key prognostic factor, this hybrid surgical-radiotherapy approach has proven effective in the management of spinal metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Separation Surgery (SS) and Advanced Radiotherapy (RT) in Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (MESCC): A Single Center Retrospective Study Comparing SBRT and 3D-CRT.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppina Bevacqua, Valentina Grespi, Eleonora Becattini, Matteo M Ottaviani, Fabio Trippa, Carlo Conti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) after Separation Surgery (SS), focusing on local disease control (LC) and overall survival (OS), in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 30 patients diagnosed with MESCC and treated with SS, followed by either SBRT (n=14) or 3D-CRT (n=16). Surgical intervention included laminectomy and tumor decompression to achieve a 2-3 mm margin. Postoperatively, patients received either hypofractionated SBRT (20-40 Gy in 2-5 fractions) or conventional 3D-CRT (16-30 Gy in 2-10 fractions). Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 64.6 years (range: 31-84), with a predominance of male patients (60%). The most common primary tumors were non-small cell lung cancer (20%) and renal cell carcinoma (20%). At 12 months, LC was significantly higher in the SBRT group (92.3%) compared to the 3D-CRT group (53.3%) (p=0.01). OS at 6, 12 and 15 months was superior in the SBRT cohort (92.8%, 71.4%, 84.6%) compared to the 3D-CRT cohort (53.3%, 40%, 13.3%), with a significant difference in favour of SBRT (p=0.009). SBRT was associated with lower local recurrence rates and better disease control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of SS and SBRT has been demonstrated to result in superior OS and LC outcomes in comparison to 3D-CRT. While the presence of visceral metastases remains a key prognostic factor, this hybrid surgical-radiotherapy approach has proven effective in the management of spinal metastases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124491\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价分离手术(SS)后立体定向体放疗(SBRT)与三维适形放疗(3D- crt)在转移性硬膜外脊髓压迫(MESCC)患者中的疗效和安全性,重点关注局部疾病控制(LC)和总生存(OS)。方法:本回顾性研究纳入30例诊断为MESCC并接受SS治疗的患者,随后进行SBRT (n=14)或3D-CRT (n=16)。手术干预包括椎板切除术和肿瘤减压以达到2-3毫米的切缘。术后,患者接受低分割SBRT (20-40 Gy,分2-5次)或常规3D-CRT (16-30 Gy,分2-10次)。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线进行统计学分析。结果:患者平均年龄64.6岁(31 ~ 84岁),男性居多(60%)。最常见的原发肿瘤是非小细胞肺癌(20%)和肾细胞癌(20%)。12个月时,SBRT组LC(92.3%)明显高于3D-CRT组(53.3%)(p=0.01)。SBRT组6、12和15个月的OS(92.8%、71.4%、84.6%)优于3D-CRT组(53.3%、40%、13.3%),支持SBRT组的OS有显著差异(p=0.009)。SBRT与较低的局部复发率和较好的疾病控制有关。结论:与3D-CRT相比,SS和SBRT联合治疗可获得更好的OS和LC结果。虽然内脏转移的存在仍然是一个关键的预后因素,但这种手术-放疗混合方法已被证明在脊柱转移的治疗中是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Separation Surgery (SS) and Advanced Radiotherapy (RT) in Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (MESCC): A Single Center Retrospective Study Comparing SBRT and 3D-CRT.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) after Separation Surgery (SS), focusing on local disease control (LC) and overall survival (OS), in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients diagnosed with MESCC and treated with SS, followed by either SBRT (n=14) or 3D-CRT (n=16). Surgical intervention included laminectomy and tumor decompression to achieve a 2-3 mm margin. Postoperatively, patients received either hypofractionated SBRT (20-40 Gy in 2-5 fractions) or conventional 3D-CRT (16-30 Gy in 2-10 fractions). Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.6 years (range: 31-84), with a predominance of male patients (60%). The most common primary tumors were non-small cell lung cancer (20%) and renal cell carcinoma (20%). At 12 months, LC was significantly higher in the SBRT group (92.3%) compared to the 3D-CRT group (53.3%) (p=0.01). OS at 6, 12 and 15 months was superior in the SBRT cohort (92.8%, 71.4%, 84.6%) compared to the 3D-CRT cohort (53.3%, 40%, 13.3%), with a significant difference in favour of SBRT (p=0.009). SBRT was associated with lower local recurrence rates and better disease control.

Conclusions: The combination of SS and SBRT has been demonstrated to result in superior OS and LC outcomes in comparison to 3D-CRT. While the presence of visceral metastases remains a key prognostic factor, this hybrid surgical-radiotherapy approach has proven effective in the management of spinal metastases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信