运动诱发电位招募曲线的层次贝叶斯估计产生准确和稳健的估计。

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vishweshwar Tyagi, Lynda M Murray, Ahmet S Asan, Christopher Mandigo, Michael S Virk, Noam Y Harel, Jason B Carmel, James R McIntosh
{"title":"运动诱发电位招募曲线的层次贝叶斯估计产生准确和稳健的估计。","authors":"Vishweshwar Tyagi, Lynda M Murray, Ahmet S Asan, Christopher Mandigo, Michael S Virk, Noam Y Harel, Jason B Carmel, James R McIntosh","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to develop a robust method to improve the estimation accuracy of motor-evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curves (RCs), including motor threshold, in small-sample settings which typically involve fewer than 40 stimuli.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a hierarchical Bayesian (HB) method to model MEP size as a rectified-logistic function of stimulation intensity. This method is designed to account for small samples, handle outliers without discarding data, quantify estimation uncertainty, and simulate synthetic data that closely matches real observations, useful for optimizing experimental design. We validate its performance on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and synthetic TMS datasets, and provide an open-source library for Python, called hbMEP, for diverse applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rectified-logistic outperformed sigmoidal functions in predictive accuracy on TMS and SCS datasets, as demonstrated through cross-validation. A mixture extension of the HB model improved robustness to outliers by further increasing its predictive accuracy. The HB model reduced threshold estimation error by up to 70% on sparse synthetic TMS data compared to non-hierarchical models. Bayesian estimation with the HB model reduced the required number of participants by at least 23% to detect a shift in threshold with 80% power, compared to frequentist testing. Empirical results on human SCS data further validated its applicability to real data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By improving accuracy on sparse data, our method minimizes the number of stimuli needed to probe each individual's neuromuscular parameters across multiple muscles simultaneously, thereby reducing session duration and the risk of inadvertent neuromodulation. Our approach provides a more statistically powerful and conclusive framework for inferring changes in threshold, and therefore corticospinal excitability. The hbMEP library streamlines and unifies the analysis of RCs across stimulation modalities and experimental paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":" ","pages":"1855-1870"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of motor-evoked potential recruitment curves yields accurate and robust estimates.\",\"authors\":\"Vishweshwar Tyagi, Lynda M Murray, Ahmet S Asan, Christopher Mandigo, Michael S Virk, Noam Y Harel, Jason B Carmel, James R McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to develop a robust method to improve the estimation accuracy of motor-evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curves (RCs), including motor threshold, in small-sample settings which typically involve fewer than 40 stimuli.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a hierarchical Bayesian (HB) method to model MEP size as a rectified-logistic function of stimulation intensity. This method is designed to account for small samples, handle outliers without discarding data, quantify estimation uncertainty, and simulate synthetic data that closely matches real observations, useful for optimizing experimental design. We validate its performance on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and synthetic TMS datasets, and provide an open-source library for Python, called hbMEP, for diverse applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rectified-logistic outperformed sigmoidal functions in predictive accuracy on TMS and SCS datasets, as demonstrated through cross-validation. A mixture extension of the HB model improved robustness to outliers by further increasing its predictive accuracy. The HB model reduced threshold estimation error by up to 70% on sparse synthetic TMS data compared to non-hierarchical models. Bayesian estimation with the HB model reduced the required number of participants by at least 23% to detect a shift in threshold with 80% power, compared to frequentist testing. Empirical results on human SCS data further validated its applicability to real data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By improving accuracy on sparse data, our method minimizes the number of stimuli needed to probe each individual's neuromuscular parameters across multiple muscles simultaneously, thereby reducing session duration and the risk of inadvertent neuromodulation. Our approach provides a more statistically powerful and conclusive framework for inferring changes in threshold, and therefore corticospinal excitability. The hbMEP library streamlines and unifies the analysis of RCs across stimulation modalities and experimental paradigms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1855-1870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目标是开发一种鲁棒的方法来提高运动诱发电位(MEP)招募曲线(rc)的估计准确性,包括运动阈值,在通常涉及少于40个刺激的小样本设置中。方法:我们提出了一种层次贝叶斯(HB)方法,将MEP大小建模为刺激强度的校正逻辑函数。该方法旨在考虑小样本,在不丢弃数据的情况下处理异常值,量化估计不确定性,并模拟与实际观测结果密切匹配的合成数据,有助于优化实验设计。我们验证了Python在经颅磁刺激(TMS)、硬膜外脊髓刺激(SCS)和合成TMS数据集上的性能,并为Python提供了一个名为hbMEP的开源库,用于各种应用。结果:如交叉验证所示,校正logistic在TMS和SCS数据集上的预测精度优于s型函数。HB模型的混合扩展通过进一步提高其预测精度来提高对异常值的鲁棒性。与非分层模型相比,HB模型将稀疏合成TMS数据的阈值估计误差降低了70%。与频率测试相比,使用HB模型的贝叶斯估计减少了至少23%的参与者,以80%的功率检测阈值的移动。对人体SCS数据的实证验证进一步验证了其对真实数据的适用性。结论:通过提高稀疏数据的准确性,我们的方法最大限度地减少了同时在多个肌肉上探测每个人的神经肌肉参数所需的刺激数量,从而减少了会话持续时间和无意神经调节的风险。我们的方法为推断阈值的变化以及皮质脊髓兴奋性提供了一个统计上更有力和结论性的框架。hbMEP库简化并统一了跨刺激模式和实验范式的RCs分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of motor-evoked potential recruitment curves yields accurate and robust estimates.

Purpose: We aim to develop a robust method to improve the estimation accuracy of motor-evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curves (RCs), including motor threshold, in small-sample settings which typically involve fewer than 40 stimuli.

Methods: We present a hierarchical Bayesian (HB) method to model MEP size as a rectified-logistic function of stimulation intensity. This method is designed to account for small samples, handle outliers without discarding data, quantify estimation uncertainty, and simulate synthetic data that closely matches real observations, useful for optimizing experimental design. We validate its performance on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and synthetic TMS datasets, and provide an open-source library for Python, called hbMEP, for diverse applications.

Results: The rectified-logistic outperformed sigmoidal functions in predictive accuracy on TMS and SCS datasets, as demonstrated through cross-validation. A mixture extension of the HB model improved robustness to outliers by further increasing its predictive accuracy. The HB model reduced threshold estimation error by up to 70% on sparse synthetic TMS data compared to non-hierarchical models. Bayesian estimation with the HB model reduced the required number of participants by at least 23% to detect a shift in threshold with 80% power, compared to frequentist testing. Empirical results on human SCS data further validated its applicability to real data.

Conclusion: By improving accuracy on sparse data, our method minimizes the number of stimuli needed to probe each individual's neuromuscular parameters across multiple muscles simultaneously, thereby reducing session duration and the risk of inadvertent neuromodulation. Our approach provides a more statistically powerful and conclusive framework for inferring changes in threshold, and therefore corticospinal excitability. The hbMEP library streamlines and unifies the analysis of RCs across stimulation modalities and experimental paradigms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
256
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation. Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信