Tobias Götschi , Gian Maranta , Marie-Rosa Fasser , Mazda Farshad , Jonas Widmer
{"title":"用于预测椎弓根螺钉松动的自动脊柱融合有限元建模框架的验证。","authors":"Tobias Götschi , Gian Maranta , Marie-Rosa Fasser , Mazda Farshad , Jonas Widmer","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to validate a patient-specific biomechanical simulation pipeline for predicting pedicle screw loosening risk in posterior spinal fusion. In particular, the research questioned whether this simulation, which integrates CT-derived bone properties, musculoskeletal force data, and finite element analysis, can outperform conventional CT attenuation measurements taken in both the vertebral body and along the planned screw trajectory.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective database analysis, including patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative and postoperative CT scans. Screw loosening was identified through manual testing during revision surgeries. CT attenuation was measured manually in the vertebral body and automatically along the screw trajectory. The biomechanical model integrated patient-specific musculoskeletal force data, CT-derived bone properties, and finite element analysis to estimate local bone loading relative to yield stress. The pipeline’s predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.</div><div>The study included 161 pedicle screws, with 48 classified as loosened. Patient-specific biomechanical modeling demonstrated superior predictive capabilities (ROC AUC = 0.919) compared to screw trajectory HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.783) and vertebral body HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.760). Patient-specific biomechanical modeling offers a more comprehensive assessment of screw loosening risk by integrating multiple influential factors compared to simple CT attenuation measurements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an automated spinal fusion finite element modeling framework for the prediction of pedicle screw loosening\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Götschi , Gian Maranta , Marie-Rosa Fasser , Mazda Farshad , Jonas Widmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to validate a patient-specific biomechanical simulation pipeline for predicting pedicle screw loosening risk in posterior spinal fusion. In particular, the research questioned whether this simulation, which integrates CT-derived bone properties, musculoskeletal force data, and finite element analysis, can outperform conventional CT attenuation measurements taken in both the vertebral body and along the planned screw trajectory.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective database analysis, including patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative and postoperative CT scans. Screw loosening was identified through manual testing during revision surgeries. CT attenuation was measured manually in the vertebral body and automatically along the screw trajectory. The biomechanical model integrated patient-specific musculoskeletal force data, CT-derived bone properties, and finite element analysis to estimate local bone loading relative to yield stress. The pipeline’s predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.</div><div>The study included 161 pedicle screws, with 48 classified as loosened. Patient-specific biomechanical modeling demonstrated superior predictive capabilities (ROC AUC = 0.919) compared to screw trajectory HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.783) and vertebral body HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.760). Patient-specific biomechanical modeling offers a more comprehensive assessment of screw loosening risk by integrating multiple influential factors compared to simple CT attenuation measurements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of an automated spinal fusion finite element modeling framework for the prediction of pedicle screw loosening
This study aimed to validate a patient-specific biomechanical simulation pipeline for predicting pedicle screw loosening risk in posterior spinal fusion. In particular, the research questioned whether this simulation, which integrates CT-derived bone properties, musculoskeletal force data, and finite element analysis, can outperform conventional CT attenuation measurements taken in both the vertebral body and along the planned screw trajectory.
We conducted a retrospective database analysis, including patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative and postoperative CT scans. Screw loosening was identified through manual testing during revision surgeries. CT attenuation was measured manually in the vertebral body and automatically along the screw trajectory. The biomechanical model integrated patient-specific musculoskeletal force data, CT-derived bone properties, and finite element analysis to estimate local bone loading relative to yield stress. The pipeline’s predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
The study included 161 pedicle screws, with 48 classified as loosened. Patient-specific biomechanical modeling demonstrated superior predictive capabilities (ROC AUC = 0.919) compared to screw trajectory HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.783) and vertebral body HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.760). Patient-specific biomechanical modeling offers a more comprehensive assessment of screw loosening risk by integrating multiple influential factors compared to simple CT attenuation measurements.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.