用于预测椎弓根螺钉松动的自动脊柱融合有限元建模框架的验证。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Tobias Götschi , Gian Maranta , Marie-Rosa Fasser , Mazda Farshad , Jonas Widmer
{"title":"用于预测椎弓根螺钉松动的自动脊柱融合有限元建模框架的验证。","authors":"Tobias Götschi ,&nbsp;Gian Maranta ,&nbsp;Marie-Rosa Fasser ,&nbsp;Mazda Farshad ,&nbsp;Jonas Widmer","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to validate a patient-specific biomechanical simulation pipeline for predicting pedicle screw loosening risk in posterior spinal fusion. In particular, the research questioned whether this simulation, which integrates CT-derived bone properties, musculoskeletal force data, and finite element analysis, can outperform conventional CT attenuation measurements taken in both the vertebral body and along the planned screw trajectory.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective database analysis, including patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative and postoperative CT scans. Screw loosening was identified through manual testing during revision surgeries. CT attenuation was measured manually in the vertebral body and automatically along the screw trajectory. The biomechanical model integrated patient-specific musculoskeletal force data, CT-derived bone properties, and finite element analysis to estimate local bone loading relative to yield stress. The pipeline’s predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.</div><div>The study included 161 pedicle screws, with 48 classified as loosened. Patient-specific biomechanical modeling demonstrated superior predictive capabilities (ROC AUC = 0.919) compared to screw trajectory HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.783) and vertebral body HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.760). Patient-specific biomechanical modeling offers a more comprehensive assessment of screw loosening risk by integrating multiple influential factors compared to simple CT attenuation measurements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an automated spinal fusion finite element modeling framework for the prediction of pedicle screw loosening\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Götschi ,&nbsp;Gian Maranta ,&nbsp;Marie-Rosa Fasser ,&nbsp;Mazda Farshad ,&nbsp;Jonas Widmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to validate a patient-specific biomechanical simulation pipeline for predicting pedicle screw loosening risk in posterior spinal fusion. In particular, the research questioned whether this simulation, which integrates CT-derived bone properties, musculoskeletal force data, and finite element analysis, can outperform conventional CT attenuation measurements taken in both the vertebral body and along the planned screw trajectory.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective database analysis, including patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative and postoperative CT scans. Screw loosening was identified through manual testing during revision surgeries. CT attenuation was measured manually in the vertebral body and automatically along the screw trajectory. The biomechanical model integrated patient-specific musculoskeletal force data, CT-derived bone properties, and finite element analysis to estimate local bone loading relative to yield stress. The pipeline’s predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.</div><div>The study included 161 pedicle screws, with 48 classified as loosened. Patient-specific biomechanical modeling demonstrated superior predictive capabilities (ROC AUC = 0.919) compared to screw trajectory HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.783) and vertebral body HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.760). Patient-specific biomechanical modeling offers a more comprehensive assessment of screw loosening risk by integrating multiple influential factors compared to simple CT attenuation measurements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在验证患者特异性的生物力学模拟管道,以预测后路脊柱融合术中椎弓根螺钉松动的风险。特别是,该研究质疑这种整合了CT衍生的骨骼特性、肌肉骨骼力数据和有限元分析的模拟是否可以优于传统的椎体和沿计划螺钉轨迹进行的CT衰减测量。我们进行了回顾性数据库分析,包括术前和术后CT扫描的腰椎融合术患者。螺钉松动是在翻修手术中通过手工测试确定的。CT衰减在椎体内人工测量,并沿螺钉轨迹自动测量。该生物力学模型综合了患者特有的肌肉骨骼力数据、ct导出的骨骼特性和有限元分析,以估计相对于屈服应力的局部骨骼负荷。使用接收算子特征(ROC)曲线评估管道的预测性能。该研究包括161个椎弓根螺钉,其中48个被分类为松动。与螺钉轨迹HU测量值(ROC AUC = 0.783)和椎体HU测量值(ROC AUC = 0.760)相比,患者特异性生物力学建模显示出更好的预测能力(ROC AUC = 0.919)。与简单的CT衰减测量相比,患者特异性生物力学建模通过整合多种影响因素,提供了更全面的螺钉松动风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of an automated spinal fusion finite element modeling framework for the prediction of pedicle screw loosening
This study aimed to validate a patient-specific biomechanical simulation pipeline for predicting pedicle screw loosening risk in posterior spinal fusion. In particular, the research questioned whether this simulation, which integrates CT-derived bone properties, musculoskeletal force data, and finite element analysis, can outperform conventional CT attenuation measurements taken in both the vertebral body and along the planned screw trajectory.
We conducted a retrospective database analysis, including patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative and postoperative CT scans. Screw loosening was identified through manual testing during revision surgeries. CT attenuation was measured manually in the vertebral body and automatically along the screw trajectory. The biomechanical model integrated patient-specific musculoskeletal force data, CT-derived bone properties, and finite element analysis to estimate local bone loading relative to yield stress. The pipeline’s predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
The study included 161 pedicle screws, with 48 classified as loosened. Patient-specific biomechanical modeling demonstrated superior predictive capabilities (ROC AUC = 0.919) compared to screw trajectory HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.783) and vertebral body HU measurements (ROC AUC = 0.760). Patient-specific biomechanical modeling offers a more comprehensive assessment of screw loosening risk by integrating multiple influential factors compared to simple CT attenuation measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信