[1.1.1]螺旋桨中中心键的质疑:来自概率密度分析的见解。

IF 2.8 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Michel V. Heinz,  and , Arne Lüchow*, 
{"title":"[1.1.1]螺旋桨中中心键的质疑:来自概率密度分析的见解。","authors":"Michel V. Heinz,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Arne Lüchow*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In the 1980s, the investigation of [1.1.1]propellane started to attract a lot of attention. The key question is the nature of the stabilization of its singlet state relative to its triplet state, sparking an intense debate about the existence of a central bond. In this work, this case is revisited with orbital-independent probability density analysis (PDA), which is based on the measurable many-electron probability density. The most probable electron positions and their exchange paths are studied for singlet [1.1.1], [2.1.1], [2.2.1], and [2.2.2]propellane as well as the triplet state in [1.1.1]propellane. The results are compared to those in ethane, cyclopropane, bicyclo[1.1.0]butane, and bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane. By analyzing the differences between singlet and triplet [1.1.1]propellane in comparison with other molecules, we conclude that the notion of a central bond is not justified and the stabilization of singlet [1.1.1]propellane arises solely from unusual many-electron exchanges involving the wing bonds.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":"129 39","pages":"8973–8981"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the Central Bond in [1.1.1]Propellane: Insights from Probability Density Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Michel V. Heinz,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Arne Lüchow*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In the 1980s, the investigation of [1.1.1]propellane started to attract a lot of attention. The key question is the nature of the stabilization of its singlet state relative to its triplet state, sparking an intense debate about the existence of a central bond. In this work, this case is revisited with orbital-independent probability density analysis (PDA), which is based on the measurable many-electron probability density. The most probable electron positions and their exchange paths are studied for singlet [1.1.1], [2.1.1], [2.2.1], and [2.2.2]propellane as well as the triplet state in [1.1.1]propellane. The results are compared to those in ethane, cyclopropane, bicyclo[1.1.0]butane, and bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane. By analyzing the differences between singlet and triplet [1.1.1]propellane in comparison with other molecules, we conclude that the notion of a central bond is not justified and the stabilization of singlet [1.1.1]propellane arises solely from unusual many-electron exchanges involving the wing bonds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":59,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A\",\"volume\":\"129 39\",\"pages\":\"8973–8981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪80年代,对[1.1.1]螺旋桨的研究开始引起人们的广泛关注。关键的问题是它的单线态相对于三重态的稳定性质,这引发了一场关于中心键存在的激烈辩论。本文利用基于可测多电子概率密度的轨道无关概率密度分析(PDA)对这种情况进行了重新研究。研究了单线态[1.1.1]、[2.1.1]、[2.2.1]和[2.2.2]推进剂以及[1.1.1]推进剂中的三重态最可能的电子位置及其交换路径。结果与乙烷、环丙烷、双环[1.1.0]丁烷和双环[1.1.1]戊烷进行了比较。通过分析单线态和三重态[1.1.1]推进剂与其他分子的区别,我们得出结论,中心键的概念是不合理的,单线态[1.1.1]推进剂的稳定完全是由涉及翼键的不寻常的多电子交换引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Questioning the Central Bond in [1.1.1]Propellane: Insights from Probability Density Analysis

Questioning the Central Bond in [1.1.1]Propellane: Insights from Probability Density Analysis

In the 1980s, the investigation of [1.1.1]propellane started to attract a lot of attention. The key question is the nature of the stabilization of its singlet state relative to its triplet state, sparking an intense debate about the existence of a central bond. In this work, this case is revisited with orbital-independent probability density analysis (PDA), which is based on the measurable many-electron probability density. The most probable electron positions and their exchange paths are studied for singlet [1.1.1], [2.1.1], [2.2.1], and [2.2.2]propellane as well as the triplet state in [1.1.1]propellane. The results are compared to those in ethane, cyclopropane, bicyclo[1.1.0]butane, and bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane. By analyzing the differences between singlet and triplet [1.1.1]propellane in comparison with other molecules, we conclude that the notion of a central bond is not justified and the stabilization of singlet [1.1.1]propellane arises solely from unusual many-electron exchanges involving the wing bonds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信