优化大麻样品制备以减少氯仿的使用:i -最优、d -最优和A-最优设计的比较

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Chaowalit Monton, Laksana Charoenchai, Jirapornchai Suksaeree, Thanapat Songsak
{"title":"优化大麻样品制备以减少氯仿的使用:i -最优、d -最优和A-最优设计的比较","authors":"Chaowalit Monton,&nbsp;Laksana Charoenchai,&nbsp;Jirapornchai Suksaeree,&nbsp;Thanapat Songsak","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to identify a safer solvent system to reduce toxic chloroform usage, consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol, and water, for the preparation of cannabis samples. A comparison among I-optimal, D-optimal, and A-optimal experimental designs for Charlotte's Angel and Hang Kra Rog Phu Phan cultivars was conducted. Results indicated that the I-optimal and D-optimal designs exhibited similar contour plot patterns and design spaces, which differed from those of the A-optimal design. The optimal solvent mixture that maximized both cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol for both cultivars was acetonitrile:methanol:water in the ratio 0.571:0.0890:0.340, demonstrating that this safer mixture performed comparably to the standard methanol:chloroform (9:1) system. The cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol contents extracted using the optimal mixture were not significantly different from those obtained with the chloroform-containing system, confirming its effectiveness. Furthermore, during a 28-day study period, cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol stored at 4 and -20°C remained stable, with no significant differences observed. In conclusion, the I-optimal design effectively optimized the cannabis sample preparation using a safer solvent mixture, reducing chloroform usage while maintaining comparable extraction efficiency and stable cannabinoid content.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Cannabis Sample Preparation to Reduce Chloroform Usage: A Comparison of I-Optimal, D-Optimal, and A-Optimal Designs\",\"authors\":\"Chaowalit Monton,&nbsp;Laksana Charoenchai,&nbsp;Jirapornchai Suksaeree,&nbsp;Thanapat Songsak\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jssc.70278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to identify a safer solvent system to reduce toxic chloroform usage, consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol, and water, for the preparation of cannabis samples. A comparison among I-optimal, D-optimal, and A-optimal experimental designs for Charlotte's Angel and Hang Kra Rog Phu Phan cultivars was conducted. Results indicated that the I-optimal and D-optimal designs exhibited similar contour plot patterns and design spaces, which differed from those of the A-optimal design. The optimal solvent mixture that maximized both cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol for both cultivars was acetonitrile:methanol:water in the ratio 0.571:0.0890:0.340, demonstrating that this safer mixture performed comparably to the standard methanol:chloroform (9:1) system. The cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol contents extracted using the optimal mixture were not significantly different from those obtained with the chloroform-containing system, confirming its effectiveness. Furthermore, during a 28-day study period, cannabidiol and ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol stored at 4 and -20°C remained stable, with no significant differences observed. In conclusion, the I-optimal design effectively optimized the cannabis sample preparation using a safer solvent mixture, reducing chloroform usage while maintaining comparable extraction efficiency and stable cannabinoid content.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"volume\":\"48 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70278\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定一种更安全的溶剂系统,以减少有毒氯仿的使用,由乙腈,甲醇和水的混合物组成,用于制备大麻样品。比较了夏绿蒂和杭克拉罗芙蓉品种的i -最优、d -最优和A-最优试验设计。结果表明,i型优化和d型优化设计与a型优化设计具有相似的等高线样图和设计空间;在两个品种中,大麻二酚和∆9-四氢大麻酚的最佳溶剂混合物为乙腈:甲醇:水,比例为0.571:0.0890:0.340,表明该混合物的安全性与标准甲醇:氯仿(9:1)体系相当。最佳混合物提取的大麻二酚和∆9-四氢大麻酚含量与含氯仿体系的含量无显著差异,证实了其有效性。此外,在28天的研究期间,大麻二酚和∆9-四氢大麻酚在4°C和-20°C下的储存保持稳定,没有观察到显著差异。综上所述,i -优化设计有效地优化了大麻样品的制备,使用了更安全的溶剂混合物,减少了氯仿的使用,同时保持了相当的提取效率和稳定的大麻素含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimizing Cannabis Sample Preparation to Reduce Chloroform Usage: A Comparison of I-Optimal, D-Optimal, and A-Optimal Designs

Optimizing Cannabis Sample Preparation to Reduce Chloroform Usage: A Comparison of I-Optimal, D-Optimal, and A-Optimal Designs

Optimizing Cannabis Sample Preparation to Reduce Chloroform Usage: A Comparison of I-Optimal, D-Optimal, and A-Optimal Designs

Optimizing Cannabis Sample Preparation to Reduce Chloroform Usage: A Comparison of I-Optimal, D-Optimal, and A-Optimal Designs

Optimizing Cannabis Sample Preparation to Reduce Chloroform Usage: A Comparison of I-Optimal, D-Optimal, and A-Optimal Designs

The aim of this study was to identify a safer solvent system to reduce toxic chloroform usage, consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol, and water, for the preparation of cannabis samples. A comparison among I-optimal, D-optimal, and A-optimal experimental designs for Charlotte's Angel and Hang Kra Rog Phu Phan cultivars was conducted. Results indicated that the I-optimal and D-optimal designs exhibited similar contour plot patterns and design spaces, which differed from those of the A-optimal design. The optimal solvent mixture that maximized both cannabidiol and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol for both cultivars was acetonitrile:methanol:water in the ratio 0.571:0.0890:0.340, demonstrating that this safer mixture performed comparably to the standard methanol:chloroform (9:1) system. The cannabidiol and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol contents extracted using the optimal mixture were not significantly different from those obtained with the chloroform-containing system, confirming its effectiveness. Furthermore, during a 28-day study period, cannabidiol and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol stored at 4 and -20°C remained stable, with no significant differences observed. In conclusion, the I-optimal design effectively optimized the cannabis sample preparation using a safer solvent mixture, reducing chloroform usage while maintaining comparable extraction efficiency and stable cannabinoid content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of separation science
Journal of separation science 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
408
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信