Bruce D. Dudley, Andy McKenzie, Jacob S. Diamond, Alice F. Hill
{"title":"互补降水同位素模型揭示了新西兰河流中年轻和新的水组分","authors":"Bruce D. Dudley, Andy McKenzie, Jacob S. Diamond, Alice F. Hill","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improved knowledge of catchment transit times can enhance our understanding of hydrological and biogeochemical processes occurring in the subsurface, and thus prediction of catchment responses to land use and global change. However, a lack of suitable precipitation tracer data in many areas worldwide hinders transit time assessment at large spatial scales. We evaluated variation in young water fractions (F<sub>yw</sub>—the fraction of streamflow less than 2.3 ± 0.8 months old) across 79 New Zealand catchments representing ~46% of New Zealand's total river discharge. F<sub>yw</sub> was calculated using two precipitation isotope models: a seasonal kriging model and a machine learning model (PINZ) trained to predict seasonal and non-seasonal variation. We also used data from PINZ to estimate monthly new water fractions (F<sub>new</sub>—the fraction of streamflow derived from precipitation that fell within the past month) using ensemble hydrograph separation. Our primary goal was to assess the reliability of the two precipitation isotope models for transit time estimation across New Zealand, where non-seasonal variation in precipitation stable isotope values is prominent in some regions. To evaluate whether F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> derived from the two precipitation isotope models captured meaningful variation in catchment hydrology, we tested for consistency of their associations with two established predictors of storage in the subsurface: catchment geology and baseflow recession constants. Our results across all sites indicate that an average of 18% of river flow was younger than ~2.3 months, with 11% younger than 1 month. F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> were similarly related to catchment geology and gradients of baseflow recession constants. Kriging provided more accurate F<sub>yw</sub> estimates than PINZ, which tended to underestimate extreme precipitation isotope values, leading to overestimates of F<sub>yw</sub>. However, the PINZ model offered reliable estimates of F<sub>new</sub> when robust estimation was used to reduce the influence of outliers; this held for sites where seasonal cycles were poorly defined, highlighting the potential for machine learning precipitation isotope models to support transit time estimation in regions with weak seasonal isotope cycles (e.g., in tropical or marine climates).</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementary Precipitation Isotope Models Reveal Young and New Water Fractions in New Zealand Rivers\",\"authors\":\"Bruce D. Dudley, Andy McKenzie, Jacob S. Diamond, Alice F. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Improved knowledge of catchment transit times can enhance our understanding of hydrological and biogeochemical processes occurring in the subsurface, and thus prediction of catchment responses to land use and global change. However, a lack of suitable precipitation tracer data in many areas worldwide hinders transit time assessment at large spatial scales. We evaluated variation in young water fractions (F<sub>yw</sub>—the fraction of streamflow less than 2.3 ± 0.8 months old) across 79 New Zealand catchments representing ~46% of New Zealand's total river discharge. F<sub>yw</sub> was calculated using two precipitation isotope models: a seasonal kriging model and a machine learning model (PINZ) trained to predict seasonal and non-seasonal variation. We also used data from PINZ to estimate monthly new water fractions (F<sub>new</sub>—the fraction of streamflow derived from precipitation that fell within the past month) using ensemble hydrograph separation. Our primary goal was to assess the reliability of the two precipitation isotope models for transit time estimation across New Zealand, where non-seasonal variation in precipitation stable isotope values is prominent in some regions. To evaluate whether F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> derived from the two precipitation isotope models captured meaningful variation in catchment hydrology, we tested for consistency of their associations with two established predictors of storage in the subsurface: catchment geology and baseflow recession constants. Our results across all sites indicate that an average of 18% of river flow was younger than ~2.3 months, with 11% younger than 1 month. F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> were similarly related to catchment geology and gradients of baseflow recession constants. Kriging provided more accurate F<sub>yw</sub> estimates than PINZ, which tended to underestimate extreme precipitation isotope values, leading to overestimates of F<sub>yw</sub>. However, the PINZ model offered reliable estimates of F<sub>new</sub> when robust estimation was used to reduce the influence of outliers; this held for sites where seasonal cycles were poorly defined, highlighting the potential for machine learning precipitation isotope models to support transit time estimation in regions with weak seasonal isotope cycles (e.g., in tropical or marine climates).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70265\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70265\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Complementary Precipitation Isotope Models Reveal Young and New Water Fractions in New Zealand Rivers
Improved knowledge of catchment transit times can enhance our understanding of hydrological and biogeochemical processes occurring in the subsurface, and thus prediction of catchment responses to land use and global change. However, a lack of suitable precipitation tracer data in many areas worldwide hinders transit time assessment at large spatial scales. We evaluated variation in young water fractions (Fyw—the fraction of streamflow less than 2.3 ± 0.8 months old) across 79 New Zealand catchments representing ~46% of New Zealand's total river discharge. Fyw was calculated using two precipitation isotope models: a seasonal kriging model and a machine learning model (PINZ) trained to predict seasonal and non-seasonal variation. We also used data from PINZ to estimate monthly new water fractions (Fnew—the fraction of streamflow derived from precipitation that fell within the past month) using ensemble hydrograph separation. Our primary goal was to assess the reliability of the two precipitation isotope models for transit time estimation across New Zealand, where non-seasonal variation in precipitation stable isotope values is prominent in some regions. To evaluate whether Fyw and Fnew derived from the two precipitation isotope models captured meaningful variation in catchment hydrology, we tested for consistency of their associations with two established predictors of storage in the subsurface: catchment geology and baseflow recession constants. Our results across all sites indicate that an average of 18% of river flow was younger than ~2.3 months, with 11% younger than 1 month. Fyw and Fnew were similarly related to catchment geology and gradients of baseflow recession constants. Kriging provided more accurate Fyw estimates than PINZ, which tended to underestimate extreme precipitation isotope values, leading to overestimates of Fyw. However, the PINZ model offered reliable estimates of Fnew when robust estimation was used to reduce the influence of outliers; this held for sites where seasonal cycles were poorly defined, highlighting the potential for machine learning precipitation isotope models to support transit time estimation in regions with weak seasonal isotope cycles (e.g., in tropical or marine climates).
期刊介绍:
Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.