互补降水同位素模型揭示了新西兰河流中年轻和新的水组分

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Bruce D. Dudley, Andy McKenzie, Jacob S. Diamond, Alice F. Hill
{"title":"互补降水同位素模型揭示了新西兰河流中年轻和新的水组分","authors":"Bruce D. Dudley,&nbsp;Andy McKenzie,&nbsp;Jacob S. Diamond,&nbsp;Alice F. Hill","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improved knowledge of catchment transit times can enhance our understanding of hydrological and biogeochemical processes occurring in the subsurface, and thus prediction of catchment responses to land use and global change. However, a lack of suitable precipitation tracer data in many areas worldwide hinders transit time assessment at large spatial scales. We evaluated variation in young water fractions (F<sub>yw</sub>—the fraction of streamflow less than 2.3 ± 0.8 months old) across 79 New Zealand catchments representing ~46% of New Zealand's total river discharge. F<sub>yw</sub> was calculated using two precipitation isotope models: a seasonal kriging model and a machine learning model (PINZ) trained to predict seasonal and non-seasonal variation. We also used data from PINZ to estimate monthly new water fractions (F<sub>new</sub>—the fraction of streamflow derived from precipitation that fell within the past month) using ensemble hydrograph separation. Our primary goal was to assess the reliability of the two precipitation isotope models for transit time estimation across New Zealand, where non-seasonal variation in precipitation stable isotope values is prominent in some regions. To evaluate whether F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> derived from the two precipitation isotope models captured meaningful variation in catchment hydrology, we tested for consistency of their associations with two established predictors of storage in the subsurface: catchment geology and baseflow recession constants. Our results across all sites indicate that an average of 18% of river flow was younger than ~2.3 months, with 11% younger than 1 month. F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> were similarly related to catchment geology and gradients of baseflow recession constants. Kriging provided more accurate F<sub>yw</sub> estimates than PINZ, which tended to underestimate extreme precipitation isotope values, leading to overestimates of F<sub>yw</sub>. However, the PINZ model offered reliable estimates of F<sub>new</sub> when robust estimation was used to reduce the influence of outliers; this held for sites where seasonal cycles were poorly defined, highlighting the potential for machine learning precipitation isotope models to support transit time estimation in regions with weak seasonal isotope cycles (e.g., in tropical or marine climates).</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementary Precipitation Isotope Models Reveal Young and New Water Fractions in New Zealand Rivers\",\"authors\":\"Bruce D. Dudley,&nbsp;Andy McKenzie,&nbsp;Jacob S. Diamond,&nbsp;Alice F. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Improved knowledge of catchment transit times can enhance our understanding of hydrological and biogeochemical processes occurring in the subsurface, and thus prediction of catchment responses to land use and global change. However, a lack of suitable precipitation tracer data in many areas worldwide hinders transit time assessment at large spatial scales. We evaluated variation in young water fractions (F<sub>yw</sub>—the fraction of streamflow less than 2.3 ± 0.8 months old) across 79 New Zealand catchments representing ~46% of New Zealand's total river discharge. F<sub>yw</sub> was calculated using two precipitation isotope models: a seasonal kriging model and a machine learning model (PINZ) trained to predict seasonal and non-seasonal variation. We also used data from PINZ to estimate monthly new water fractions (F<sub>new</sub>—the fraction of streamflow derived from precipitation that fell within the past month) using ensemble hydrograph separation. Our primary goal was to assess the reliability of the two precipitation isotope models for transit time estimation across New Zealand, where non-seasonal variation in precipitation stable isotope values is prominent in some regions. To evaluate whether F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> derived from the two precipitation isotope models captured meaningful variation in catchment hydrology, we tested for consistency of their associations with two established predictors of storage in the subsurface: catchment geology and baseflow recession constants. Our results across all sites indicate that an average of 18% of river flow was younger than ~2.3 months, with 11% younger than 1 month. F<sub>yw</sub> and F<sub>new</sub> were similarly related to catchment geology and gradients of baseflow recession constants. Kriging provided more accurate F<sub>yw</sub> estimates than PINZ, which tended to underestimate extreme precipitation isotope values, leading to overestimates of F<sub>yw</sub>. However, the PINZ model offered reliable estimates of F<sub>new</sub> when robust estimation was used to reduce the influence of outliers; this held for sites where seasonal cycles were poorly defined, highlighting the potential for machine learning precipitation isotope models to support transit time estimation in regions with weak seasonal isotope cycles (e.g., in tropical or marine climates).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70265\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70265\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高对流域过境时间的认识可以增强我们对地下发生的水文和生物地球化学过程的理解,从而预测流域对土地利用和全球变化的响应。然而,全球许多地区缺乏合适的降水示踪资料,阻碍了在大空间尺度上的传输时间评估。我们评估了新西兰79个集水区的年轻水组分(小于2.3±0.8个月的河流流量)的变化,这些集水区约占新西兰河流总流量的46%。Fyw使用两种降水同位素模型计算:季节性克里格模型和机器学习模型(PINZ),用于预测季节性和非季节性变化。我们还利用PINZ的数据,利用集合水线分离来估计每月的新水组分(fnew -来自过去一个月内降水的溪流流量的组分)。我们的主要目标是评估两种降水同位素模型在新西兰过境时间估计中的可靠性,在新西兰的一些地区,降水稳定同位素值的非季节性变化非常突出。为了评估来自两个降水同位素模型的Fyw和Fnew是否捕获了流域水文的有意义的变化,我们测试了它们与两个已建立的地下储水量预测指标(流域地质和基流衰退常数)之间的相关性。所有站点的结果表明,平均18%的河流流量小于2.3个月,11%的河流流量小于1个月。Fyw和Fnew与流域地质和基流衰退常数梯度相似。Kriging提供了比PINZ更准确的Fyw估计,PINZ倾向于低估极端降水同位素值,导致Fyw的高估。然而,当使用稳健估计来减少异常值的影响时,PINZ模型提供了可靠的Fnew估计;这适用于季节周期定义不明确的地点,突出了机器学习降水同位素模型在季节性同位素周期较弱的地区(例如热带或海洋气候)支持过境时间估计的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Complementary Precipitation Isotope Models Reveal Young and New Water Fractions in New Zealand Rivers

Complementary Precipitation Isotope Models Reveal Young and New Water Fractions in New Zealand Rivers

Improved knowledge of catchment transit times can enhance our understanding of hydrological and biogeochemical processes occurring in the subsurface, and thus prediction of catchment responses to land use and global change. However, a lack of suitable precipitation tracer data in many areas worldwide hinders transit time assessment at large spatial scales. We evaluated variation in young water fractions (Fyw—the fraction of streamflow less than 2.3 ± 0.8 months old) across 79 New Zealand catchments representing ~46% of New Zealand's total river discharge. Fyw was calculated using two precipitation isotope models: a seasonal kriging model and a machine learning model (PINZ) trained to predict seasonal and non-seasonal variation. We also used data from PINZ to estimate monthly new water fractions (Fnew—the fraction of streamflow derived from precipitation that fell within the past month) using ensemble hydrograph separation. Our primary goal was to assess the reliability of the two precipitation isotope models for transit time estimation across New Zealand, where non-seasonal variation in precipitation stable isotope values is prominent in some regions. To evaluate whether Fyw and Fnew derived from the two precipitation isotope models captured meaningful variation in catchment hydrology, we tested for consistency of their associations with two established predictors of storage in the subsurface: catchment geology and baseflow recession constants. Our results across all sites indicate that an average of 18% of river flow was younger than ~2.3 months, with 11% younger than 1 month. Fyw and Fnew were similarly related to catchment geology and gradients of baseflow recession constants. Kriging provided more accurate Fyw estimates than PINZ, which tended to underestimate extreme precipitation isotope values, leading to overestimates of Fyw. However, the PINZ model offered reliable estimates of Fnew when robust estimation was used to reduce the influence of outliers; this held for sites where seasonal cycles were poorly defined, highlighting the potential for machine learning precipitation isotope models to support transit time estimation in regions with weak seasonal isotope cycles (e.g., in tropical or marine climates).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信