基于专利和文献分析的技术成熟度评估框架——以地下压缩空气和储氢发电为例

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Liangchao Huang, Zhengmeng Hou, Jianhua Liu, Hans-Peter Beck, Lin Wu, Qichen Wang, Yilin Guo, Tianle Shi, Ru Zhang
{"title":"基于专利和文献分析的技术成熟度评估框架——以地下压缩空气和储氢发电为例","authors":"Liangchao Huang,&nbsp;Zhengmeng Hou,&nbsp;Jianhua Liu,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Beck,&nbsp;Lin Wu,&nbsp;Qichen Wang,&nbsp;Yilin Guo,&nbsp;Tianle Shi,&nbsp;Ru Zhang","doi":"10.1155/er/9255306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technological maturity serves as a critical indicator for evaluating the current state of technology development and forecasting future trends. It has been widely applied in high-tech fields, defense, and strategic emerging industries. This paper develops a multidimensional technology maturity assessment framework based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing maturity assessment methods and relevant application studies. The proposed model correlates computed values with the nine levels of technology readiness levels (TRLs) and the four stages of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), providing a quantitative supplement to these classifications. Utilizing this evaluation model, the maturity levels of five underground compressed air and hydrogen storage power generation (UCHPG) technologies were assessed. The results, as of 2023, reveal that compressed air energy storage (CAES) has attained the highest TRL of 9. Conversely, hydrogen energy storage and fuel cell (HES-FC) systems achieved a TRL of 7, hydrogen-heated CAES (HH-CAES) and hydrogen energy storage and gas turbine (HES-GT) systems both reached a TRL of 6, while advanced adiabatic CAES (AA-CAES) obtained a lower TRL of 5. To validate the proposed assessment model, a comparative analysis was conducted with recent literature on the TRL classifications of these five technologies. The findings indicate that the multicriteria technology maturity evaluation model proposed in this paper is reliable, addressing the limitations of single-criterion assessment methods and providing a more comprehensive evaluation of technology maturity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/9255306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Technology Maturity Assessment Based on Patent and Literature Analysis: A Case Study of Underground Compressed Air and Hydrogen Storage Power Generation\",\"authors\":\"Liangchao Huang,&nbsp;Zhengmeng Hou,&nbsp;Jianhua Liu,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Beck,&nbsp;Lin Wu,&nbsp;Qichen Wang,&nbsp;Yilin Guo,&nbsp;Tianle Shi,&nbsp;Ru Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/er/9255306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Technological maturity serves as a critical indicator for evaluating the current state of technology development and forecasting future trends. It has been widely applied in high-tech fields, defense, and strategic emerging industries. This paper develops a multidimensional technology maturity assessment framework based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing maturity assessment methods and relevant application studies. The proposed model correlates computed values with the nine levels of technology readiness levels (TRLs) and the four stages of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), providing a quantitative supplement to these classifications. Utilizing this evaluation model, the maturity levels of five underground compressed air and hydrogen storage power generation (UCHPG) technologies were assessed. The results, as of 2023, reveal that compressed air energy storage (CAES) has attained the highest TRL of 9. Conversely, hydrogen energy storage and fuel cell (HES-FC) systems achieved a TRL of 7, hydrogen-heated CAES (HH-CAES) and hydrogen energy storage and gas turbine (HES-GT) systems both reached a TRL of 6, while advanced adiabatic CAES (AA-CAES) obtained a lower TRL of 5. To validate the proposed assessment model, a comparative analysis was conducted with recent literature on the TRL classifications of these five technologies. The findings indicate that the multicriteria technology maturity evaluation model proposed in this paper is reliable, addressing the limitations of single-criterion assessment methods and providing a more comprehensive evaluation of technology maturity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/9255306\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/9255306\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/9255306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术成熟度是评价技术发展现状和预测未来趋势的重要指标。在高新技术、国防、战略性新兴产业等领域得到广泛应用。本文在综合评价现有技术成熟度评价方法和相关应用研究的基础上,构建了一个多维度的技术成熟度评价框架。该模型将计算值与技术准备水平(TRLs)的九个等级和创造性问题解决理论(TRIZ)的四个阶段相关联,为这些分类提供了定量补充。利用该评价模型,对5种地下压缩空气储氢发电技术的成熟度进行了评价。结果显示,截至2023年,压缩空气储能(CAES)达到了最高的TRL 9。相反,氢储能和燃料电池(hs - fc)系统的TRL为7,氢加热CAES (hs -CAES)和氢储能和燃气轮机(hs - gt)系统的TRL均为6,而先进绝热CAES (aaa -CAES)的TRL较低,为5。为了验证所提出的评估模型,与最近关于这五种技术的TRL分类的文献进行了比较分析。研究结果表明,本文提出的多准则技术成熟度评价模型是可靠的,解决了单准则评价方法的局限性,提供了更全面的技术成熟度评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Framework for Technology Maturity Assessment Based on Patent and Literature Analysis: A Case Study of Underground Compressed Air and Hydrogen Storage Power Generation

A Framework for Technology Maturity Assessment Based on Patent and Literature Analysis: A Case Study of Underground Compressed Air and Hydrogen Storage Power Generation

Technological maturity serves as a critical indicator for evaluating the current state of technology development and forecasting future trends. It has been widely applied in high-tech fields, defense, and strategic emerging industries. This paper develops a multidimensional technology maturity assessment framework based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing maturity assessment methods and relevant application studies. The proposed model correlates computed values with the nine levels of technology readiness levels (TRLs) and the four stages of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), providing a quantitative supplement to these classifications. Utilizing this evaluation model, the maturity levels of five underground compressed air and hydrogen storage power generation (UCHPG) technologies were assessed. The results, as of 2023, reveal that compressed air energy storage (CAES) has attained the highest TRL of 9. Conversely, hydrogen energy storage and fuel cell (HES-FC) systems achieved a TRL of 7, hydrogen-heated CAES (HH-CAES) and hydrogen energy storage and gas turbine (HES-GT) systems both reached a TRL of 6, while advanced adiabatic CAES (AA-CAES) obtained a lower TRL of 5. To validate the proposed assessment model, a comparative analysis was conducted with recent literature on the TRL classifications of these five technologies. The findings indicate that the multicriteria technology maturity evaluation model proposed in this paper is reliable, addressing the limitations of single-criterion assessment methods and providing a more comprehensive evaluation of technology maturity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信