基于增强术后恢复的移动应用程序的评估,以支持接受结肠直肠癌手术的患者:一项试点研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Pia Buch Nørgaard, Marian Christin Petersen
{"title":"基于增强术后恢复的移动应用程序的评估,以支持接受结肠直肠癌手术的患者:一项试点研究","authors":"Pia Buch Nørgaard,&nbsp;Marian Christin Petersen","doi":"10.1155/ecc/8896217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Aims and Objectives:</b> The aim is to evaluate the effect of a recently developed mobile application consisting of information, tasks, and gamification has had for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients undergoing colorectal surgery are recommended to follow enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines. Yet, patients do not always follow ERAS recommendations. Patients express that they would like to have information about their course, that information material must be available at different times, and that too many papers and pamphlets can seem confusing and overwhelming.</p><p><b>Design:</b> In this comparative nonrandomized pilot study, a mobile application is evaluated. Thirty-eight adult patients divided into intervention and control groups were included the study. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Both groups answered questionnaires before discharge after surgery. Demographic data, The Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire Subsequently (PCSQ-PRE_24), intake of protein drink, and the degree of mobilization were collected. Four patients from the intervention group participated in a focus group interview. The STROBE cohort checklist was used.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The study showed significant difference in favor of the intervention group in PCSQ-PRE_24: subtheme understanding and involvement in care processes <i>p</i> = 0.043 and total score <i>p</i> = 0.034 as well as intake of protein drink showed significant difference <i>p</i> = 0.012. There was no significant difference in terms of mobilization. The patients stated that the mobile application was easy to use and made them secure through their surgical procedure.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The results from this pilot study showed that patients undergoing colorectal surgery benefit from a tool in the form of a mobile application that can guide them through their surgical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/8896217","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Mobile Application Based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Recommendations to Support Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Pia Buch Nørgaard,&nbsp;Marian Christin Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ecc/8896217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Aims and Objectives:</b> The aim is to evaluate the effect of a recently developed mobile application consisting of information, tasks, and gamification has had for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients undergoing colorectal surgery are recommended to follow enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines. Yet, patients do not always follow ERAS recommendations. Patients express that they would like to have information about their course, that information material must be available at different times, and that too many papers and pamphlets can seem confusing and overwhelming.</p><p><b>Design:</b> In this comparative nonrandomized pilot study, a mobile application is evaluated. Thirty-eight adult patients divided into intervention and control groups were included the study. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Both groups answered questionnaires before discharge after surgery. Demographic data, The Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire Subsequently (PCSQ-PRE_24), intake of protein drink, and the degree of mobilization were collected. Four patients from the intervention group participated in a focus group interview. The STROBE cohort checklist was used.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The study showed significant difference in favor of the intervention group in PCSQ-PRE_24: subtheme understanding and involvement in care processes <i>p</i> = 0.043 and total score <i>p</i> = 0.034 as well as intake of protein drink showed significant difference <i>p</i> = 0.012. There was no significant difference in terms of mobilization. The patients stated that the mobile application was easy to use and made them secure through their surgical procedure.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The results from this pilot study showed that patients undergoing colorectal surgery benefit from a tool in the form of a mobile application that can guide them through their surgical procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/8896217\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/8896217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/8896217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目的:目的是评估最近开发的由信息、任务和游戏化组成的移动应用程序对接受结直肠手术的患者的影响。背景:建议接受结直肠手术的患者遵循术后增强恢复(ERAS)指南。然而,患者并不总是遵循ERAS的建议。患者表示,他们希望了解自己的病程,信息材料必须在不同的时间提供,而太多的文件和小册子似乎令人困惑和压倒性的。设计:在这个比较的非随机试点研究中,评估了一个移动应用程序。38名成年患者被分为干预组和对照组。采用定量和定性相结合的方法。方法:两组患者均在术后出院前进行问卷调查。收集人口统计学资料、结肠直肠癌手术准备问卷(PCSQ-PRE_24)、蛋白饮料摄入量、运动程度。干预组4例患者参加焦点小组访谈。采用STROBE队列检查表。结果:干预组在PCSQ-PRE_24的子主题理解和护理过程参与p = 0.043,总得分p = 0.034,蛋白饮料摄入p = 0.012方面存在显著差异。在动员方面没有显著差异。患者表示,该移动应用程序易于使用,并使他们在手术过程中保持安全。结论:这项初步研究的结果表明,接受结直肠手术的患者受益于一种移动应用程序形式的工具,可以指导他们完成手术过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of a Mobile Application Based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Recommendations to Support Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Pilot Study

Evaluation of a Mobile Application Based on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Recommendations to Support Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Pilot Study

Aims and Objectives: The aim is to evaluate the effect of a recently developed mobile application consisting of information, tasks, and gamification has had for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Background: Patients undergoing colorectal surgery are recommended to follow enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines. Yet, patients do not always follow ERAS recommendations. Patients express that they would like to have information about their course, that information material must be available at different times, and that too many papers and pamphlets can seem confusing and overwhelming.

Design: In this comparative nonrandomized pilot study, a mobile application is evaluated. Thirty-eight adult patients divided into intervention and control groups were included the study. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used.

Methods: Both groups answered questionnaires before discharge after surgery. Demographic data, The Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire Subsequently (PCSQ-PRE_24), intake of protein drink, and the degree of mobilization were collected. Four patients from the intervention group participated in a focus group interview. The STROBE cohort checklist was used.

Results: The study showed significant difference in favor of the intervention group in PCSQ-PRE_24: subtheme understanding and involvement in care processes p = 0.043 and total score p = 0.034 as well as intake of protein drink showed significant difference p = 0.012. There was no significant difference in terms of mobilization. The patients stated that the mobile application was easy to use and made them secure through their surgical procedure.

Conclusion: The results from this pilot study showed that patients undergoing colorectal surgery benefit from a tool in the form of a mobile application that can guide them through their surgical procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信