13年记录显示潜在生物能源作物土壤碳积累持续时间和深度的差异

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
I. B. Kantola, E. Blanc-Betes, A. von Haden, M. D. Masters, B. Blakely, C. J. Bernacchi, E. H. DeLucia
{"title":"13年记录显示潜在生物能源作物土壤碳积累持续时间和深度的差异","authors":"I. B. Kantola,&nbsp;E. Blanc-Betes,&nbsp;A. von Haden,&nbsp;M. D. Masters,&nbsp;B. Blakely,&nbsp;C. J. Bernacchi,&nbsp;E. H. DeLucia","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Six years after replacing a maize/soybean cropping system, perennial grasses miscanthus (<i>Miscanthus</i> × <i>giganteus</i>) and switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i>), and a 28-species restored prairie increased particulate organic carbon in surface soils without increasing soil organic carbon (SOC). To resolve potential changes in the quantity and distribution of SOC, soils were resampled after seven to thirteen years to measure bulk density, carbon (C) content, and stable C isotopes to a depth of 1 m. SOC stocks increased between 1.75 and 2.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> in all perennial crops between 2008 and 2016 (nine growing seasons). Despite relatively low litter inputs and belowground biomass, the highest rate of SOC accrual was in restored prairie (2.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), followed by miscanthus (2.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) and switchgrass (1.75 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). The change in SOC in maize/soybean was not significant. After 2016, total SOC decreased in maize/soybean and miscanthus, resulting in slower overall rates of SOC accumulation over the full sampling period for miscanthus (0.8 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). The rate of SOC accumulation was greatest below 50 cm depth for restored prairie and switchgrass but in the top 10 cm for miscanthus. Stable isotope analysis showed <sup>13</sup>C enrichment in all depths of switchgrass soils, an indication of new organic C accumulation, but mixed results in all other crops. Planting perennial crops on land formerly in an annual maize/soybean cropping system can slow or reverse soil carbon losses, with the greatest increases in SOC from species-rich prairie.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 13-Year Record Indicates Differences in the Duration and Depth of Soil Carbon Accrual Among Potential Bioenergy Crops\",\"authors\":\"I. B. Kantola,&nbsp;E. Blanc-Betes,&nbsp;A. von Haden,&nbsp;M. D. Masters,&nbsp;B. Blakely,&nbsp;C. J. Bernacchi,&nbsp;E. H. DeLucia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Six years after replacing a maize/soybean cropping system, perennial grasses miscanthus (<i>Miscanthus</i> × <i>giganteus</i>) and switchgrass (<i>Panicum virgatum</i>), and a 28-species restored prairie increased particulate organic carbon in surface soils without increasing soil organic carbon (SOC). To resolve potential changes in the quantity and distribution of SOC, soils were resampled after seven to thirteen years to measure bulk density, carbon (C) content, and stable C isotopes to a depth of 1 m. SOC stocks increased between 1.75 and 2.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> in all perennial crops between 2008 and 2016 (nine growing seasons). Despite relatively low litter inputs and belowground biomass, the highest rate of SOC accrual was in restored prairie (2.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), followed by miscanthus (2.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) and switchgrass (1.75 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). The change in SOC in maize/soybean was not significant. After 2016, total SOC decreased in maize/soybean and miscanthus, resulting in slower overall rates of SOC accumulation over the full sampling period for miscanthus (0.8 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). The rate of SOC accumulation was greatest below 50 cm depth for restored prairie and switchgrass but in the top 10 cm for miscanthus. Stable isotope analysis showed <sup>13</sup>C enrichment in all depths of switchgrass soils, an indication of new organic C accumulation, but mixed results in all other crops. Planting perennial crops on land formerly in an annual maize/soybean cropping system can slow or reverse soil carbon losses, with the greatest increases in SOC from species-rich prairie.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70080\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在取代玉米/大豆种植制度6年后,多年生牧草芒草(miscanthus × giganteus)和柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum)以及28种恢复草原增加了表层土壤的颗粒有机碳,但没有增加土壤有机碳(SOC)。为了确定土壤有机碳的数量和分布可能发生的变化,研究人员在7 ~ 13年后重新采样土壤,测量土壤的容重、碳(C)含量和稳定碳同位素,采样深度为1 m。2008年至2016年(9个生长季节),所有多年生作物的有机碳储量增加了1.75至2.5 Mg ha−1年−1年。尽管凋落物输入和地下生物量相对较少,但恢复草原土壤有机碳积累速率最高(2.5 Mg ha−1年−1年−1),其次是芒草(2.0 Mg ha−1年−1年−1)和柳枝稷(1.75 Mg ha−1年−1)。玉米/大豆有机碳含量变化不显著。2016年以后,玉米/大豆和芒草的总有机碳含量下降,导致芒草在整个采样期内(0.8 Mg ha−1年−1)有机碳积累的总体速率减慢。恢复草原和柳枝稷的土壤有机碳积累速率在50 cm以下最高,而芒草在10 cm以下最高。稳定同位素分析表明,柳枝稷土壤在所有深度都有13C富集,表明有机碳的新积累,但在所有其他作物中结果喜忧参半。在原为一年生玉米/大豆种植系统的土地上种植多年生作物可以减缓或逆转土壤碳损失,物种丰富的草原土壤有机碳增加最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A 13-Year Record Indicates Differences in the Duration and Depth of Soil Carbon Accrual Among Potential Bioenergy Crops

A 13-Year Record Indicates Differences in the Duration and Depth of Soil Carbon Accrual Among Potential Bioenergy Crops

Six years after replacing a maize/soybean cropping system, perennial grasses miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and a 28-species restored prairie increased particulate organic carbon in surface soils without increasing soil organic carbon (SOC). To resolve potential changes in the quantity and distribution of SOC, soils were resampled after seven to thirteen years to measure bulk density, carbon (C) content, and stable C isotopes to a depth of 1 m. SOC stocks increased between 1.75 and 2.5 Mg ha−1 year−1 in all perennial crops between 2008 and 2016 (nine growing seasons). Despite relatively low litter inputs and belowground biomass, the highest rate of SOC accrual was in restored prairie (2.5 Mg ha−1 year−1), followed by miscanthus (2.0 Mg ha−1 year−1) and switchgrass (1.75 Mg ha−1 year−1). The change in SOC in maize/soybean was not significant. After 2016, total SOC decreased in maize/soybean and miscanthus, resulting in slower overall rates of SOC accumulation over the full sampling period for miscanthus (0.8 Mg ha−1 year−1). The rate of SOC accumulation was greatest below 50 cm depth for restored prairie and switchgrass but in the top 10 cm for miscanthus. Stable isotope analysis showed 13C enrichment in all depths of switchgrass soils, an indication of new organic C accumulation, but mixed results in all other crops. Planting perennial crops on land formerly in an annual maize/soybean cropping system can slow or reverse soil carbon losses, with the greatest increases in SOC from species-rich prairie.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信