{"title":"沟通孤岛:海上风电规划和许可流程的治理网络方法","authors":"Tiffany Smythe , Shannon Howley , Emily Diamond , David Bidwell","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective communication about offshore wind and other new energy infrastructure is necessary to achieve nations' energy policy goals. It is also uniquely challenging, particularly in the United States, given the early stage of development and the multi-layered, multi-faceted offshore wind energy governance context. This paper applied a communication approach to the offshore wind energy governance network to assess how network attributes shape communication dynamics and challenges for two offshore wind developments in the northeastern U.S. We employed social network analysis and thematic analysis to characterize and analyze network structure and influential and missing actors, in order to understand communication patterns shaping these projects' planning and permitting. Whole network results revealed a low-density, decentralized structure, which elucidates thematic analysis findings of the network's unwieldiness and a communication vacuum problem. The network comprises one core and multiple peripheral clusters shaped by sector, geography and/or attitudes; this is supported by thematic analysis findings that communities are isolated in silos. The most influential actors were the two project developers and the lead permitting agency. However, thematic analysis results suggest they may not be performing bridging functions or facilitating information flow. Missing actors included Tribes, and sectors with lower influence included local governments, fishers, stakeholder groups, and scientific organizations. The network's unwieldiness may explain stakeholder isolation and limited engagement with key constituencies. Results inform multiple recommendations for research and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104328"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication silos: A governance network approach to the offshore wind planning and permitting process\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Smythe , Shannon Howley , Emily Diamond , David Bidwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Effective communication about offshore wind and other new energy infrastructure is necessary to achieve nations' energy policy goals. It is also uniquely challenging, particularly in the United States, given the early stage of development and the multi-layered, multi-faceted offshore wind energy governance context. This paper applied a communication approach to the offshore wind energy governance network to assess how network attributes shape communication dynamics and challenges for two offshore wind developments in the northeastern U.S. We employed social network analysis and thematic analysis to characterize and analyze network structure and influential and missing actors, in order to understand communication patterns shaping these projects' planning and permitting. Whole network results revealed a low-density, decentralized structure, which elucidates thematic analysis findings of the network's unwieldiness and a communication vacuum problem. The network comprises one core and multiple peripheral clusters shaped by sector, geography and/or attitudes; this is supported by thematic analysis findings that communities are isolated in silos. The most influential actors were the two project developers and the lead permitting agency. However, thematic analysis results suggest they may not be performing bridging functions or facilitating information flow. Missing actors included Tribes, and sectors with lower influence included local governments, fishers, stakeholder groups, and scientific organizations. The network's unwieldiness may explain stakeholder isolation and limited engagement with key constituencies. Results inform multiple recommendations for research and practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004098\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Communication silos: A governance network approach to the offshore wind planning and permitting process
Effective communication about offshore wind and other new energy infrastructure is necessary to achieve nations' energy policy goals. It is also uniquely challenging, particularly in the United States, given the early stage of development and the multi-layered, multi-faceted offshore wind energy governance context. This paper applied a communication approach to the offshore wind energy governance network to assess how network attributes shape communication dynamics and challenges for two offshore wind developments in the northeastern U.S. We employed social network analysis and thematic analysis to characterize and analyze network structure and influential and missing actors, in order to understand communication patterns shaping these projects' planning and permitting. Whole network results revealed a low-density, decentralized structure, which elucidates thematic analysis findings of the network's unwieldiness and a communication vacuum problem. The network comprises one core and multiple peripheral clusters shaped by sector, geography and/or attitudes; this is supported by thematic analysis findings that communities are isolated in silos. The most influential actors were the two project developers and the lead permitting agency. However, thematic analysis results suggest they may not be performing bridging functions or facilitating information flow. Missing actors included Tribes, and sectors with lower influence included local governments, fishers, stakeholder groups, and scientific organizations. The network's unwieldiness may explain stakeholder isolation and limited engagement with key constituencies. Results inform multiple recommendations for research and practice.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.