实施非手术管理/器官保存在加拿大局部晚期直肠癌:临床实践的全国调查

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Kristopher Dennis , Victoria Ivankovic , Doris Goubran , Eliane Paglicaucan , Mariam Alsobaei , Nicole Alcasid , Mary Farnand , Megan Delisle
{"title":"实施非手术管理/器官保存在加拿大局部晚期直肠癌:临床实践的全国调查","authors":"Kristopher Dennis ,&nbsp;Victoria Ivankovic ,&nbsp;Doris Goubran ,&nbsp;Eliane Paglicaucan ,&nbsp;Mariam Alsobaei ,&nbsp;Nicole Alcasid ,&nbsp;Mary Farnand ,&nbsp;Megan Delisle","doi":"10.1016/S0167-8140(25)04706-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>Non-operative management/organ preservation (NOM/ OP) strategies can achieve oncologic outcomes similar to those involving total mesorectal excision (TME), and they are being increasingly offered to patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer. Our study aimed to describe the implementation of these strategies in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>Through non-probabilistic convenience sampling we recruited a clinical expert representative from each of the 44 Canadian centres that offer radiotherapy, systemic therapy and surgery. Representatives completed an electronic survey to describe NOM/OP strategies for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer at their centres in terms of availability, patient selection, treatment protocols, response assessments, surveillance, quality assurance resources and perceived challenges. A primary OP strategy was defined as one where neoadjuvant therapy is administered with the explicit initial goal of achieving a complete clinical response (cCR) or a near-complete clinical response (nCR), thereby avoiding an immediate TME. A secondary OP strategy was defined as one where a cCR or nCR allows for previously unplanned avoidance of an immediate TME due to an initial explicit goal of proceeding with surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>From June to August 2023, 40/44(91%) of representatives responded: 24/40(60%) radiation oncologists, 13/40(32.5%) surgeons and 3/40(7.5%) medical oncologists. All provinces were represented: Atlantic (NFL/PEI/NS/NB) 4/40(10%), Quebec 10/40(25%), Ontario 15/40(37.5%), Prairies (MB/SK/AB) 5/40(12.5%), British Columbia 6/40(15%). Of the responding centres, 31/40(77.5%) offered some form of NOM/OP, with 20/40(50%) offering both primary and secondary, 11/40(27.5%) offering only secondary, 8/40(20%) offering neither and 1/40(2.5%) not clarifying. Of the 31 centres offering NOM/OP, 58.6% always/frequently did so after a cCR (17/29 responses) and 14.3% always/frequently did so after a nCR (4/28 responses). Of the 20 centres offering primary OP, 17/20(85%) always/frequently used long course chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy and 6/20(30%) always/ frequently used long course chemoradiation alone. Standardized criteria for response assessments were used by 18/20(90%) centres for MRI (with 12/20, 60% having synoptic templates) and by 12/20(60%) centres for endoscopy (with only 1/20, 5% having a synoptic template). Among all respondents, the most commonly reported challenges to implementing primary OP were access to MRI (21/40, 52.5%), clinic time/space for the number of required assessments (18/40, 45%), access to timely surgery when required (16/40, 40%), lack of comfort/familiarity with long-term outcomes of supporting evidence (15/40, 37.5%), and staff capacity for the number of required assessments (14/40, 35%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>Canadian centres are increasingly using non-operative management / organ preservation strategies, but variability exists in their availability, implementation and structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"210 ","pages":"Page S21"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTATION OF NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT / ORGAN PRESERVATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL CANCER IN CANADA: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF CLINICAL PRACTICE\",\"authors\":\"Kristopher Dennis ,&nbsp;Victoria Ivankovic ,&nbsp;Doris Goubran ,&nbsp;Eliane Paglicaucan ,&nbsp;Mariam Alsobaei ,&nbsp;Nicole Alcasid ,&nbsp;Mary Farnand ,&nbsp;Megan Delisle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0167-8140(25)04706-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>Non-operative management/organ preservation (NOM/ OP) strategies can achieve oncologic outcomes similar to those involving total mesorectal excision (TME), and they are being increasingly offered to patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer. Our study aimed to describe the implementation of these strategies in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>Through non-probabilistic convenience sampling we recruited a clinical expert representative from each of the 44 Canadian centres that offer radiotherapy, systemic therapy and surgery. Representatives completed an electronic survey to describe NOM/OP strategies for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer at their centres in terms of availability, patient selection, treatment protocols, response assessments, surveillance, quality assurance resources and perceived challenges. A primary OP strategy was defined as one where neoadjuvant therapy is administered with the explicit initial goal of achieving a complete clinical response (cCR) or a near-complete clinical response (nCR), thereby avoiding an immediate TME. A secondary OP strategy was defined as one where a cCR or nCR allows for previously unplanned avoidance of an immediate TME due to an initial explicit goal of proceeding with surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>From June to August 2023, 40/44(91%) of representatives responded: 24/40(60%) radiation oncologists, 13/40(32.5%) surgeons and 3/40(7.5%) medical oncologists. All provinces were represented: Atlantic (NFL/PEI/NS/NB) 4/40(10%), Quebec 10/40(25%), Ontario 15/40(37.5%), Prairies (MB/SK/AB) 5/40(12.5%), British Columbia 6/40(15%). Of the responding centres, 31/40(77.5%) offered some form of NOM/OP, with 20/40(50%) offering both primary and secondary, 11/40(27.5%) offering only secondary, 8/40(20%) offering neither and 1/40(2.5%) not clarifying. Of the 31 centres offering NOM/OP, 58.6% always/frequently did so after a cCR (17/29 responses) and 14.3% always/frequently did so after a nCR (4/28 responses). Of the 20 centres offering primary OP, 17/20(85%) always/frequently used long course chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy and 6/20(30%) always/ frequently used long course chemoradiation alone. Standardized criteria for response assessments were used by 18/20(90%) centres for MRI (with 12/20, 60% having synoptic templates) and by 12/20(60%) centres for endoscopy (with only 1/20, 5% having a synoptic template). Among all respondents, the most commonly reported challenges to implementing primary OP were access to MRI (21/40, 52.5%), clinic time/space for the number of required assessments (18/40, 45%), access to timely surgery when required (16/40, 40%), lack of comfort/familiarity with long-term outcomes of supporting evidence (15/40, 37.5%), and staff capacity for the number of required assessments (14/40, 35%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>Canadian centres are increasingly using non-operative management / organ preservation strategies, but variability exists in their availability, implementation and structure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Page S21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814025047061\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814025047061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非手术治疗/器官保存(NOM/ OP)策略可以达到与全肠系膜切除(TME)相似的肿瘤预后,并且越来越多地提供给局部晚期直肠癌患者。我们的研究旨在描述这些策略在加拿大的实施情况。材料和方法:通过非概率方便抽样,我们从加拿大44个提供放射治疗、全身治疗和手术的中心分别招募了一名临床专家代表。代表们完成了一项电子调查,从可用性、患者选择、治疗方案、反应评估、监测、质量保证资源和感知挑战等方面描述了他们中心局部晚期直肠癌患者的NOM/OP策略。主要手术策略被定义为新辅助治疗的实施,其明确的初始目标是实现完全临床反应(cCR)或接近完全临床反应(nCR),从而避免立即发生TME。次要手术策略被定义为cCR或nCR允许由于进行手术的初始明确目标而事先意外避免立即TME的策略。结果:2023年6 - 8月,有40/44(91%)的代表回应:24/40(60%)放射肿瘤学家,13/40(32.5%)外科医生,3/40(7.5%)内科肿瘤学家。所有省份都有代表:大西洋(NFL/PEI/NS/NB) 4/40(10%),魁北克10/40(25%),安大略省15/40(37.5%),草原(MB/SK/AB) 5/40(12.5%),不列颠哥伦比亚省6/40(15%)。在回应的中心中,31/40(77.5%)提供某种形式的NOM/OP, 20/40(50%)提供初级和二级,11/40(27.5%)只提供二级,8/40(20%)不提供,1/40(2.5%)不澄清。在31个提供NOM/OP的中心中,58.6%总是/经常在cCR(17/29个答复)后这样做,14.3%总是/经常在nCR(4/28个答复)后这样做。在20个提供原发性手术的中心中,17/20(85%)总是/经常使用长期放化疗,然后是巩固化疗,6/20(30%)总是/经常使用长期放化疗。18/20(90%)的MRI中心(12/20,60%)使用了标准化的反应评估标准,12/20(60%)的内窥镜中心(只有1/ 20.5%)使用了症状模板。在所有受访者中,实施初级手术最常见的挑战是获得MRI(21/40, 52.5%),所需评估数量的临床时间/空间(18/40,45%),在需要时及时获得手术(16/40,40%),对支持证据的长期结果缺乏舒适/熟悉(15/40,37.5%),以及工作人员能力所需评估数量(14/40,35%)。结论:加拿大中心越来越多地采用非手术管理/器官保存策略,但其可用性、实施和结构存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPLEMENTATION OF NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT / ORGAN PRESERVATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL CANCER IN CANADA: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Purpose:

Non-operative management/organ preservation (NOM/ OP) strategies can achieve oncologic outcomes similar to those involving total mesorectal excision (TME), and they are being increasingly offered to patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer. Our study aimed to describe the implementation of these strategies in Canada.

Materials and Methods:

Through non-probabilistic convenience sampling we recruited a clinical expert representative from each of the 44 Canadian centres that offer radiotherapy, systemic therapy and surgery. Representatives completed an electronic survey to describe NOM/OP strategies for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer at their centres in terms of availability, patient selection, treatment protocols, response assessments, surveillance, quality assurance resources and perceived challenges. A primary OP strategy was defined as one where neoadjuvant therapy is administered with the explicit initial goal of achieving a complete clinical response (cCR) or a near-complete clinical response (nCR), thereby avoiding an immediate TME. A secondary OP strategy was defined as one where a cCR or nCR allows for previously unplanned avoidance of an immediate TME due to an initial explicit goal of proceeding with surgery.

Results:

From June to August 2023, 40/44(91%) of representatives responded: 24/40(60%) radiation oncologists, 13/40(32.5%) surgeons and 3/40(7.5%) medical oncologists. All provinces were represented: Atlantic (NFL/PEI/NS/NB) 4/40(10%), Quebec 10/40(25%), Ontario 15/40(37.5%), Prairies (MB/SK/AB) 5/40(12.5%), British Columbia 6/40(15%). Of the responding centres, 31/40(77.5%) offered some form of NOM/OP, with 20/40(50%) offering both primary and secondary, 11/40(27.5%) offering only secondary, 8/40(20%) offering neither and 1/40(2.5%) not clarifying. Of the 31 centres offering NOM/OP, 58.6% always/frequently did so after a cCR (17/29 responses) and 14.3% always/frequently did so after a nCR (4/28 responses). Of the 20 centres offering primary OP, 17/20(85%) always/frequently used long course chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy and 6/20(30%) always/ frequently used long course chemoradiation alone. Standardized criteria for response assessments were used by 18/20(90%) centres for MRI (with 12/20, 60% having synoptic templates) and by 12/20(60%) centres for endoscopy (with only 1/20, 5% having a synoptic template). Among all respondents, the most commonly reported challenges to implementing primary OP were access to MRI (21/40, 52.5%), clinic time/space for the number of required assessments (18/40, 45%), access to timely surgery when required (16/40, 40%), lack of comfort/familiarity with long-term outcomes of supporting evidence (15/40, 37.5%), and staff capacity for the number of required assessments (14/40, 35%).

Conclusions:

Canadian centres are increasingly using non-operative management / organ preservation strategies, but variability exists in their availability, implementation and structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信