印度尼西亚抗生素滥用的贫困和非贫困差距:布林德-瓦哈卡分解分析

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni, Bunga Astria Paramashanti, Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih, Asep Kusnali, Syarifah Nuraini, Debri Rizki Faisal
{"title":"印度尼西亚抗生素滥用的贫困和非贫困差距:布林德-瓦哈卡分解分析","authors":"Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni,&nbsp;Bunga Astria Paramashanti,&nbsp;Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih,&nbsp;Asep Kusnali,&nbsp;Syarifah Nuraini,&nbsp;Debri Rizki Faisal","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem considered</h3><div>Antibiotic misuse is a significant public health concern. Moreover, the gap between poor and non-poor groups in Indonesia remains understudied. Identifying the factors contributing to this disparity is key for effective intervention strategies. This study aims to quantify the contributing factors explaining the gap in antibiotic misuse between the poor and the non-poor in Indonesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from the 2023 Indonesia Health Survey, which included 446,605 individuals aged 15 years and older in Indonesia. The main effect was antibiotic misuse—buying medications without a prescription from practitioners. Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse determinants were examined using Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition, which separates differences between groups into those explained by observed factors and those unexplained by them.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The gap of antibiotic misuse between poor and non-poor groups was 6.0 percentage points (p &lt; 0.001). The between-group differences in the predictors of study participants (endowments) contributed 0.051 (85.0 %) to the gap, whereas the between-group differences in effects of the predictors (coefficients) contributed 0.009 (15.0 %) towards the gap. The predictors that contributed most towards the gap due to endowments (explained component) were household economic status, knowledge of antibiotic use, antibiotic procurement source, region, and insurance ownership, and due to coefficients were place of residence, insurance ownership, drug literacy, knowledge of antibiotic use, and region.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Endowments like economic status and antibiotic knowledge explain much of the antibiotic usage discrepancy between poor and non-poor groups. Economic, health education, and healthcare interventions may narrow this gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 102172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse in Indonesia: A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni,&nbsp;Bunga Astria Paramashanti,&nbsp;Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih,&nbsp;Asep Kusnali,&nbsp;Syarifah Nuraini,&nbsp;Debri Rizki Faisal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem considered</h3><div>Antibiotic misuse is a significant public health concern. Moreover, the gap between poor and non-poor groups in Indonesia remains understudied. Identifying the factors contributing to this disparity is key for effective intervention strategies. This study aims to quantify the contributing factors explaining the gap in antibiotic misuse between the poor and the non-poor in Indonesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from the 2023 Indonesia Health Survey, which included 446,605 individuals aged 15 years and older in Indonesia. The main effect was antibiotic misuse—buying medications without a prescription from practitioners. Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse determinants were examined using Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition, which separates differences between groups into those explained by observed factors and those unexplained by them.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The gap of antibiotic misuse between poor and non-poor groups was 6.0 percentage points (p &lt; 0.001). The between-group differences in the predictors of study participants (endowments) contributed 0.051 (85.0 %) to the gap, whereas the between-group differences in effects of the predictors (coefficients) contributed 0.009 (15.0 %) towards the gap. The predictors that contributed most towards the gap due to endowments (explained component) were household economic status, knowledge of antibiotic use, antibiotic procurement source, region, and insurance ownership, and due to coefficients were place of residence, insurance ownership, drug literacy, knowledge of antibiotic use, and region.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Endowments like economic status and antibiotic knowledge explain much of the antibiotic usage discrepancy between poor and non-poor groups. Economic, health education, and healthcare interventions may narrow this gap.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素滥用是一个重大的公共卫生问题。此外,印度尼西亚贫困和非贫困群体之间的差距仍未得到充分研究。确定造成这种差异的因素是有效干预策略的关键。本研究旨在量化解释印度尼西亚穷人和非穷人之间抗生素滥用差距的促成因素。方法:我们使用来自2023年印度尼西亚健康调查的数据,其中包括印度尼西亚446,605名15岁及以上的个体。其主要影响是抗生素滥用——在没有医生处方的情况下购买药物。使用Blinder-Oaxaca分解方法检查了抗生素滥用决定因素的贫穷和非贫穷差距,该方法将群体之间的差异分为由观察到的因素解释的差异和由这些因素解释的差异。结果贫困组与非贫困组抗生素滥用差异为6.0个百分点(p < 0.001)。研究参与者预测因子(禀赋)的组间差异对差距贡献0.051(85.0%),而预测因子(系数)效应的组间差异对差距贡献0.009(15.0%)。由于禀赋(解释成分)对差距贡献最大的预测因子是家庭经济状况、抗生素使用知识、抗生素采购来源、地区和保险所有权,由于系数是居住地、保险所有权、药物素养、抗生素使用知识和地区。结论贫困人群与非贫困人群抗生素使用差异的主要原因是经济状况和抗生素知识等禀赋。经济、健康教育和保健干预措施可能会缩小这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse in Indonesia: A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis

Problem considered

Antibiotic misuse is a significant public health concern. Moreover, the gap between poor and non-poor groups in Indonesia remains understudied. Identifying the factors contributing to this disparity is key for effective intervention strategies. This study aims to quantify the contributing factors explaining the gap in antibiotic misuse between the poor and the non-poor in Indonesia.

Methods

We used data from the 2023 Indonesia Health Survey, which included 446,605 individuals aged 15 years and older in Indonesia. The main effect was antibiotic misuse—buying medications without a prescription from practitioners. Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse determinants were examined using Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition, which separates differences between groups into those explained by observed factors and those unexplained by them.

Results

The gap of antibiotic misuse between poor and non-poor groups was 6.0 percentage points (p < 0.001). The between-group differences in the predictors of study participants (endowments) contributed 0.051 (85.0 %) to the gap, whereas the between-group differences in effects of the predictors (coefficients) contributed 0.009 (15.0 %) towards the gap. The predictors that contributed most towards the gap due to endowments (explained component) were household economic status, knowledge of antibiotic use, antibiotic procurement source, region, and insurance ownership, and due to coefficients were place of residence, insurance ownership, drug literacy, knowledge of antibiotic use, and region.

Conclusion

Endowments like economic status and antibiotic knowledge explain much of the antibiotic usage discrepancy between poor and non-poor groups. Economic, health education, and healthcare interventions may narrow this gap.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信