Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni, Bunga Astria Paramashanti, Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih, Asep Kusnali, Syarifah Nuraini, Debri Rizki Faisal
{"title":"印度尼西亚抗生素滥用的贫困和非贫困差距:布林德-瓦哈卡分解分析","authors":"Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni, Bunga Astria Paramashanti, Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih, Asep Kusnali, Syarifah Nuraini, Debri Rizki Faisal","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem considered</h3><div>Antibiotic misuse is a significant public health concern. Moreover, the gap between poor and non-poor groups in Indonesia remains understudied. Identifying the factors contributing to this disparity is key for effective intervention strategies. This study aims to quantify the contributing factors explaining the gap in antibiotic misuse between the poor and the non-poor in Indonesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from the 2023 Indonesia Health Survey, which included 446,605 individuals aged 15 years and older in Indonesia. The main effect was antibiotic misuse—buying medications without a prescription from practitioners. Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse determinants were examined using Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition, which separates differences between groups into those explained by observed factors and those unexplained by them.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The gap of antibiotic misuse between poor and non-poor groups was 6.0 percentage points (p < 0.001). The between-group differences in the predictors of study participants (endowments) contributed 0.051 (85.0 %) to the gap, whereas the between-group differences in effects of the predictors (coefficients) contributed 0.009 (15.0 %) towards the gap. The predictors that contributed most towards the gap due to endowments (explained component) were household economic status, knowledge of antibiotic use, antibiotic procurement source, region, and insurance ownership, and due to coefficients were place of residence, insurance ownership, drug literacy, knowledge of antibiotic use, and region.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Endowments like economic status and antibiotic knowledge explain much of the antibiotic usage discrepancy between poor and non-poor groups. Economic, health education, and healthcare interventions may narrow this gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 102172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse in Indonesia: A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni, Bunga Astria Paramashanti, Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih, Asep Kusnali, Syarifah Nuraini, Debri Rizki Faisal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem considered</h3><div>Antibiotic misuse is a significant public health concern. Moreover, the gap between poor and non-poor groups in Indonesia remains understudied. Identifying the factors contributing to this disparity is key for effective intervention strategies. This study aims to quantify the contributing factors explaining the gap in antibiotic misuse between the poor and the non-poor in Indonesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from the 2023 Indonesia Health Survey, which included 446,605 individuals aged 15 years and older in Indonesia. The main effect was antibiotic misuse—buying medications without a prescription from practitioners. Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse determinants were examined using Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition, which separates differences between groups into those explained by observed factors and those unexplained by them.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The gap of antibiotic misuse between poor and non-poor groups was 6.0 percentage points (p < 0.001). The between-group differences in the predictors of study participants (endowments) contributed 0.051 (85.0 %) to the gap, whereas the between-group differences in effects of the predictors (coefficients) contributed 0.009 (15.0 %) towards the gap. The predictors that contributed most towards the gap due to endowments (explained component) were household economic status, knowledge of antibiotic use, antibiotic procurement source, region, and insurance ownership, and due to coefficients were place of residence, insurance ownership, drug literacy, knowledge of antibiotic use, and region.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Endowments like economic status and antibiotic knowledge explain much of the antibiotic usage discrepancy between poor and non-poor groups. Economic, health education, and healthcare interventions may narrow this gap.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse in Indonesia: A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis
Problem considered
Antibiotic misuse is a significant public health concern. Moreover, the gap between poor and non-poor groups in Indonesia remains understudied. Identifying the factors contributing to this disparity is key for effective intervention strategies. This study aims to quantify the contributing factors explaining the gap in antibiotic misuse between the poor and the non-poor in Indonesia.
Methods
We used data from the 2023 Indonesia Health Survey, which included 446,605 individuals aged 15 years and older in Indonesia. The main effect was antibiotic misuse—buying medications without a prescription from practitioners. Poor and non-poor gaps in antibiotic misuse determinants were examined using Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition, which separates differences between groups into those explained by observed factors and those unexplained by them.
Results
The gap of antibiotic misuse between poor and non-poor groups was 6.0 percentage points (p < 0.001). The between-group differences in the predictors of study participants (endowments) contributed 0.051 (85.0 %) to the gap, whereas the between-group differences in effects of the predictors (coefficients) contributed 0.009 (15.0 %) towards the gap. The predictors that contributed most towards the gap due to endowments (explained component) were household economic status, knowledge of antibiotic use, antibiotic procurement source, region, and insurance ownership, and due to coefficients were place of residence, insurance ownership, drug literacy, knowledge of antibiotic use, and region.
Conclusion
Endowments like economic status and antibiotic knowledge explain much of the antibiotic usage discrepancy between poor and non-poor groups. Economic, health education, and healthcare interventions may narrow this gap.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.