立体定向消融体放射治疗局部复发性前列腺癌的可行性

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Amandeep Taggar , Andrea Deabreu , John Hudson , Hans Chung , Gerard Morton , Andrew Loblaw
{"title":"立体定向消融体放射治疗局部复发性前列腺癌的可行性","authors":"Amandeep Taggar ,&nbsp;Andrea Deabreu ,&nbsp;John Hudson ,&nbsp;Hans Chung ,&nbsp;Gerard Morton ,&nbsp;Andrew Loblaw","doi":"10.1016/S0167-8140(25)04741-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>Salvage stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging option for radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). To mitigate the increased risk of rectal toxicity, the use of a rectal spacer is an attractive option. However, increased fibrosis in previously irradiated tissue can make spacer placement a challenge. We aimed to assess the feasibility of successful rectal spacer placement in patients receiving SBRT for radio-recurrent PCa.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>This is a single institution Phase-I/II feasibility study. All patients had histologically confirmed locally recurrent PCa without any evidence of distant metastasis. All patients received 25 Gy to the whole gland and 35 Gy to the recurrent lesion in 5 weekly fractions following placement of a rectal spacer. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of spacer placement, defined as the ability to successfully deploy the spacer without complications. Secondary endpoints included acute and late toxicity (graded per CTCAE v5.0), quality of life using EPIC and IPSS as well as biochemical disease-free survival-based on PSA kinetics.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Between 2022-2024, 10 patients were enrolled. Median age and PSA at recurrence were 68.1 years (IQR: 66.1-72.7) and 3.45 (IQR: 3.2-4.8), respectively. Six and 4 patients had ISUP Grade group 2 and 3 disease. Rectal spacer placement was successfully performed in 9 of the 10 patients (90%). Spacer placement was unsuccessful in 1 patient due to inability to hydrodissect. No acute or late complications were reported with spacer placement. Radiation related acute Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were observed in 10% and 30% of patients, respectively. No acute Grade ≥3 toxicities were reported (Table 1). At a median follow-up of 19.6 months, PSA kinetics was available for 8 patients, and all were alive without evidence of local or distant failure. The PSA nadir achieved a median value of 0.07 ng/mL at a median time of 12.6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>Rectal spacer placement in conjunction with SBRT for radio-recurrent prostate cancer was feasible in most patients, with no acute or late complications. This treatment option provides acceptable toxicity and encouraging early oncologic outcomes. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess long-term efficacy and safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"210 ","pages":"Pages S35-S36"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FEASIBILITY OF INTEGRATING RECTAL HYDROGEL SPACER FOR SALVAGE TREATMENT USING STEREOTACTIC ABLATIVE BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER\",\"authors\":\"Amandeep Taggar ,&nbsp;Andrea Deabreu ,&nbsp;John Hudson ,&nbsp;Hans Chung ,&nbsp;Gerard Morton ,&nbsp;Andrew Loblaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0167-8140(25)04741-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>Salvage stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging option for radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). To mitigate the increased risk of rectal toxicity, the use of a rectal spacer is an attractive option. However, increased fibrosis in previously irradiated tissue can make spacer placement a challenge. We aimed to assess the feasibility of successful rectal spacer placement in patients receiving SBRT for radio-recurrent PCa.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><div>This is a single institution Phase-I/II feasibility study. All patients had histologically confirmed locally recurrent PCa without any evidence of distant metastasis. All patients received 25 Gy to the whole gland and 35 Gy to the recurrent lesion in 5 weekly fractions following placement of a rectal spacer. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of spacer placement, defined as the ability to successfully deploy the spacer without complications. Secondary endpoints included acute and late toxicity (graded per CTCAE v5.0), quality of life using EPIC and IPSS as well as biochemical disease-free survival-based on PSA kinetics.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Between 2022-2024, 10 patients were enrolled. Median age and PSA at recurrence were 68.1 years (IQR: 66.1-72.7) and 3.45 (IQR: 3.2-4.8), respectively. Six and 4 patients had ISUP Grade group 2 and 3 disease. Rectal spacer placement was successfully performed in 9 of the 10 patients (90%). Spacer placement was unsuccessful in 1 patient due to inability to hydrodissect. No acute or late complications were reported with spacer placement. Radiation related acute Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were observed in 10% and 30% of patients, respectively. No acute Grade ≥3 toxicities were reported (Table 1). At a median follow-up of 19.6 months, PSA kinetics was available for 8 patients, and all were alive without evidence of local or distant failure. The PSA nadir achieved a median value of 0.07 ng/mL at a median time of 12.6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>Rectal spacer placement in conjunction with SBRT for radio-recurrent prostate cancer was feasible in most patients, with no acute or late complications. This treatment option provides acceptable toxicity and encouraging early oncologic outcomes. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess long-term efficacy and safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S35-S36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814025047413\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814025047413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:挽救性立体定向消融体放疗(SBRT)是放射复发性前列腺癌(PCa)的一种新选择。为了减轻直肠毒性增加的风险,使用直肠垫片是一个有吸引力的选择。然而,先前辐照组织中纤维化的增加会使间隔器的放置成为一个挑战。我们的目的是评估在接受SBRT治疗放射复发性前列腺癌的患者中成功放置直肠间隔器的可行性。材料和方法:这是一项单机构i /II期可行性研究。所有患者均经组织学证实为局部复发性前列腺癌,无远处转移迹象。所有患者在放置直肠间隔器后,每5周接受25 Gy的全腺照射和35 Gy的复发病灶照射。主要终点是隔离剂放置的可行性,定义为成功放置隔离剂而不产生并发症的能力。次要终点包括急性和晚期毒性(按CTCAE v5.0分级),使用EPIC和IPSS的生活质量以及基于PSA动力学的生化无病生存。结果:在2022-2024年间,10名患者入组。复发时的中位年龄和PSA分别为68.1岁(IQR: 66.1-72.7)和3.45岁(IQR: 3.2-4.8)。6例和4例患者为ISUP分级2组和3组疾病。10例患者中有9例(90%)成功放置直肠垫片。1例患者由于无法进行水解剖,植入垫片失败。垫片放置无急性或晚期并发症报道。放射相关的急性2级或以上胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性分别在10%和30%的患者中观察到。无急性≥3级毒性报告(表1)。在19.6个月的中位随访中,有8例患者的PSA动力学可用,所有患者都存活,没有局部或远处衰竭的证据。PSA最低点的中位值为0.07 ng/mL,中位时间为12.6个月。结论:直肠间隔置入联合SBRT治疗放射复发性前列腺癌在大多数患者中是可行的,无急性或晚期并发症。这种治疗方案提供了可接受的毒性和鼓励早期肿瘤预后。需要更长时间的随访来评估长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FEASIBILITY OF INTEGRATING RECTAL HYDROGEL SPACER FOR SALVAGE TREATMENT USING STEREOTACTIC ABLATIVE BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER

Purpose:

Salvage stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging option for radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). To mitigate the increased risk of rectal toxicity, the use of a rectal spacer is an attractive option. However, increased fibrosis in previously irradiated tissue can make spacer placement a challenge. We aimed to assess the feasibility of successful rectal spacer placement in patients receiving SBRT for radio-recurrent PCa.

Materials and Methods:

This is a single institution Phase-I/II feasibility study. All patients had histologically confirmed locally recurrent PCa without any evidence of distant metastasis. All patients received 25 Gy to the whole gland and 35 Gy to the recurrent lesion in 5 weekly fractions following placement of a rectal spacer. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of spacer placement, defined as the ability to successfully deploy the spacer without complications. Secondary endpoints included acute and late toxicity (graded per CTCAE v5.0), quality of life using EPIC and IPSS as well as biochemical disease-free survival-based on PSA kinetics.

Results:

Between 2022-2024, 10 patients were enrolled. Median age and PSA at recurrence were 68.1 years (IQR: 66.1-72.7) and 3.45 (IQR: 3.2-4.8), respectively. Six and 4 patients had ISUP Grade group 2 and 3 disease. Rectal spacer placement was successfully performed in 9 of the 10 patients (90%). Spacer placement was unsuccessful in 1 patient due to inability to hydrodissect. No acute or late complications were reported with spacer placement. Radiation related acute Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were observed in 10% and 30% of patients, respectively. No acute Grade ≥3 toxicities were reported (Table 1). At a median follow-up of 19.6 months, PSA kinetics was available for 8 patients, and all were alive without evidence of local or distant failure. The PSA nadir achieved a median value of 0.07 ng/mL at a median time of 12.6 months.

Conclusions:

Rectal spacer placement in conjunction with SBRT for radio-recurrent prostate cancer was feasible in most patients, with no acute or late complications. This treatment option provides acceptable toxicity and encouraging early oncologic outcomes. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信