A. Cernuda García , E.O. Turienzo Santos , T. Díaz Vico , A. Mesa Álvarez , R. Rodríguez Uría , M. Moreno Gijón , L.M. Sanz Álvarez
{"title":"多层螺旋ct在选择腹膜癌患者作为细胞减少手术和腹腔内热化疗候选者中的作用:使用腹膜癌指数的放射学和外科评分之间的一致性","authors":"A. Cernuda García , E.O. Turienzo Santos , T. Díaz Vico , A. Mesa Álvarez , R. Rodríguez Uría , M. Moreno Gijón , L.M. Sanz Álvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2025.101585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI > 20 as a predictor of unresectability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":"67 5","pages":"Article 101585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of MDCT for selection of peritoneal carcinomatosis patients as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Concordance between radiological and surgical scores using the Peritoneal Cancer Index\",\"authors\":\"A. Cernuda García , E.O. Turienzo Santos , T. Díaz Vico , A. Mesa Álvarez , R. Rodríguez Uría , M. Moreno Gijón , L.M. Sanz Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rxeng.2025.101585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI > 20 as a predictor of unresectability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510725001077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510725001077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of MDCT for selection of peritoneal carcinomatosis patients as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Concordance between radiological and surgical scores using the Peritoneal Cancer Index
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.
Methods
Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI > 20 as a predictor of unresectability.
Results
50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).
Conclusion
MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.