多层螺旋ct在选择腹膜癌患者作为细胞减少手术和腹腔内热化疗候选者中的作用:使用腹膜癌指数的放射学和外科评分之间的一致性

A. Cernuda García , E.O. Turienzo Santos , T. Díaz Vico , A. Mesa Álvarez , R. Rodríguez Uría , M. Moreno Gijón , L.M. Sanz Álvarez
{"title":"多层螺旋ct在选择腹膜癌患者作为细胞减少手术和腹腔内热化疗候选者中的作用:使用腹膜癌指数的放射学和外科评分之间的一致性","authors":"A. Cernuda García ,&nbsp;E.O. Turienzo Santos ,&nbsp;T. Díaz Vico ,&nbsp;A. Mesa Álvarez ,&nbsp;R. Rodríguez Uría ,&nbsp;M. Moreno Gijón ,&nbsp;L.M. Sanz Álvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2025.101585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI &gt; 20 as a predictor of unresectability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":"67 5","pages":"Article 101585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of MDCT for selection of peritoneal carcinomatosis patients as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Concordance between radiological and surgical scores using the Peritoneal Cancer Index\",\"authors\":\"A. Cernuda García ,&nbsp;E.O. Turienzo Santos ,&nbsp;T. Díaz Vico ,&nbsp;A. Mesa Álvarez ,&nbsp;R. Rodríguez Uría ,&nbsp;M. Moreno Gijón ,&nbsp;L.M. Sanz Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rxeng.2025.101585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI &gt; 20 as a predictor of unresectability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510725001077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510725001077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过分析腹膜癌(PC)指数中放射学(rPCI)评分与外科(sPCI)评分的相关程度,评价多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)选择腹膜癌(PC)患者进行减胞手术和腹腔内热化疗(CRS + HIPEC)的准确性。方法2014年5月1日至2018年5月31日进行观察性、回顾性、单中心研究。采用一致性相关系数(CCC)将MDCT评估的计算rPCI与sPCI进行比较。使用Bland-Altman方法绘制两个观测值与平均值的差值,置信区间(CI)为95%。我们将sPCI的截断点设为15,并考虑rPCI的敏感性和特异性[gt; 20]作为不可切除性的预测因子,以此评估肿瘤体积是否会影响CCC。结果50例患者接受手术治疗。平均sPCI为11.8 (9.5),rPCI为11.0 (10.2),CCC为0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97)。35例spci20患者的CCC敏感性为0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-0.92),特异性为0.40 (95% CI: 0.05-0.85)。阳性预测值为0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 ~ 0.98),阴性预测值为0.20 (95% CI: 0.03 ~ 0.56)。结论经放射科专家解释的mdct对CRS + HIPEC候选患者的选择是可靠的;然而,rPCI值不能单独视为全面治疗的禁忌症。较大的肿瘤体积通常导致rPCI和sPCI的一致性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of MDCT for selection of peritoneal carcinomatosis patients as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Concordance between radiological and surgical scores using the Peritoneal Cancer Index

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) as candidates for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), through an analysis of the degree of correlation between the radiological (rPCI) and surgical (sPCI) scores in the PC index.

Methods

Observational, retrospective, single-centre study between 1 May 2014 and 31 May 2018. Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman method was used to plot the difference between the two observations against their mean with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. We assessed whether tumour volume affects the CCC by setting a cut-off point of sPCI at 15 and considering a sensitivity and specificity of rPCI > 20 as a predictor of unresectability.

Results

50 patients underwent surgery. Mean sPCI was 11.8 (9.5) and rPCI was 11.0 (10.2), with a CCC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.97). The CCC in the 35 patients with sPCI 20 had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.92) and a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85). The positive predictive value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80–0.98), while the negative predictive value was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.03–0.56).

Conclusion

MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable for the selection of patients as candidates for CRS + HIPEC; however, the rPCI value cannot be considered in isolation as a contraindication to full treatment. Greater tumour volume usually leads to a worse concordance between rPCI and sPCI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信