{"title":"批判性思维教育减少中学生的阴谋和超自然信仰:第一阶段试验","authors":"Denis Caroti , Jais Adam-Troian , Manon Theraud , Virginie Bagneux","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unfounded beliefs (UB), specifically paranormal and conspiracy beliefs, are not in accordance with knowledge and evidence of contemporary science and lead to public health risks (e.g., vaccine hesitancy) and societal hazards (e.g., anti-democratic attitudes). Effective educational interventions for K-12 contexts remain scarce. This phase I randomized-controlled trial evaluated a critical thinking (CT) intervention among secondary school students in France (8th and 9th graders, n = 135). The intervention, consisting of an 8-hour standardized CT education intervention, delivered in eight weekly 1-hour sessions, aimed to improve rational judgment by targeting cognitive processes linked to UB (e.g., overreliance on intuition, ontological confusions). Compared to a control group, children receiving the intervention showed reduced conspiracy beliefs post-intervention (d = 0.56) and at follow-up (d = 0.53). Paranormal beliefs showed a smaller immediate reduction (d = 0.49) but returned to baseline after one month. This is the first randomized trial demonstrating a feasible, standardized CT intervention reducing both paranormal and conspiracy beliefs in secondary school students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical thinking education to decrease conspiracy and paranormal beliefs among secondary school students: A phase I trial\",\"authors\":\"Denis Caroti , Jais Adam-Troian , Manon Theraud , Virginie Bagneux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Unfounded beliefs (UB), specifically paranormal and conspiracy beliefs, are not in accordance with knowledge and evidence of contemporary science and lead to public health risks (e.g., vaccine hesitancy) and societal hazards (e.g., anti-democratic attitudes). Effective educational interventions for K-12 contexts remain scarce. This phase I randomized-controlled trial evaluated a critical thinking (CT) intervention among secondary school students in France (8th and 9th graders, n = 135). The intervention, consisting of an 8-hour standardized CT education intervention, delivered in eight weekly 1-hour sessions, aimed to improve rational judgment by targeting cognitive processes linked to UB (e.g., overreliance on intuition, ontological confusions). Compared to a control group, children receiving the intervention showed reduced conspiracy beliefs post-intervention (d = 0.56) and at follow-up (d = 0.53). Paranormal beliefs showed a smaller immediate reduction (d = 0.49) but returned to baseline after one month. This is the first randomized trial demonstrating a feasible, standardized CT intervention reducing both paranormal and conspiracy beliefs in secondary school students.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000785\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000785","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical thinking education to decrease conspiracy and paranormal beliefs among secondary school students: A phase I trial
Unfounded beliefs (UB), specifically paranormal and conspiracy beliefs, are not in accordance with knowledge and evidence of contemporary science and lead to public health risks (e.g., vaccine hesitancy) and societal hazards (e.g., anti-democratic attitudes). Effective educational interventions for K-12 contexts remain scarce. This phase I randomized-controlled trial evaluated a critical thinking (CT) intervention among secondary school students in France (8th and 9th graders, n = 135). The intervention, consisting of an 8-hour standardized CT education intervention, delivered in eight weekly 1-hour sessions, aimed to improve rational judgment by targeting cognitive processes linked to UB (e.g., overreliance on intuition, ontological confusions). Compared to a control group, children receiving the intervention showed reduced conspiracy beliefs post-intervention (d = 0.56) and at follow-up (d = 0.53). Paranormal beliefs showed a smaller immediate reduction (d = 0.49) but returned to baseline after one month. This is the first randomized trial demonstrating a feasible, standardized CT intervention reducing both paranormal and conspiracy beliefs in secondary school students.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.