基于分层mpc的协同驾驶前向避碰安全共享控制

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Haoqi Yan , Yue Qu , Renjie Li , Wenyu Li , Hongqing Chu , Junjie Zhao , Guangyuan Yu , Fei Ma , Shengbo Eben Li , Jingliang Duan
{"title":"基于分层mpc的协同驾驶前向避碰安全共享控制","authors":"Haoqi Yan ,&nbsp;Yue Qu ,&nbsp;Renjie Li ,&nbsp;Wenyu Li ,&nbsp;Hongqing Chu ,&nbsp;Junjie Zhao ,&nbsp;Guangyuan Yu ,&nbsp;Fei Ma ,&nbsp;Shengbo Eben Li ,&nbsp;Jingliang Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human–machine shared control plays a vital role in enhancing driving safety through collision avoidance assistance. Existing collaborative controllers typically integrate risk assessment and control computation within one Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework, which can lead to computational challenges when incorporating essential nonlinear vehicle dynamics for accurate trajectory evaluation. To address this issue, we propose a novel safe shared control scheme with two key components: First, a trajectory generator produces multiple smooth, collision-free candidate trajectories considering both obstacle avoidance and vehicle stability constraints. Second, a hierarchical MPC module evaluates and executes these trajectories through a dual-layer structure. The upper layer uses a linear model to compute control inputs and then evaluates them with a nonlinear vehicle dynamics model for risk assessment, while the lower layer calculates the actual control commands based on a simplified linear model by tracking the selected optimal trajectory. This separation of trajectory generation, risk evaluation, and control computation significantly enhances both computational efficiency and safety assurance. A series of collision avoidance experiments was conducted on a driving simulator to evaluate the proposed method. Results show that the proposed method significantly enhances safety in human–machine shared control driving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106581"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hierarchical MPC-based safe shared control for forward collision avoidance in collaborative driving\",\"authors\":\"Haoqi Yan ,&nbsp;Yue Qu ,&nbsp;Renjie Li ,&nbsp;Wenyu Li ,&nbsp;Hongqing Chu ,&nbsp;Junjie Zhao ,&nbsp;Guangyuan Yu ,&nbsp;Fei Ma ,&nbsp;Shengbo Eben Li ,&nbsp;Jingliang Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Human–machine shared control plays a vital role in enhancing driving safety through collision avoidance assistance. Existing collaborative controllers typically integrate risk assessment and control computation within one Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework, which can lead to computational challenges when incorporating essential nonlinear vehicle dynamics for accurate trajectory evaluation. To address this issue, we propose a novel safe shared control scheme with two key components: First, a trajectory generator produces multiple smooth, collision-free candidate trajectories considering both obstacle avoidance and vehicle stability constraints. Second, a hierarchical MPC module evaluates and executes these trajectories through a dual-layer structure. The upper layer uses a linear model to compute control inputs and then evaluates them with a nonlinear vehicle dynamics model for risk assessment, while the lower layer calculates the actual control commands based on a simplified linear model by tracking the selected optimal trajectory. This separation of trajectory generation, risk evaluation, and control computation significantly enhances both computational efficiency and safety assurance. A series of collision avoidance experiments was conducted on a driving simulator to evaluate the proposed method. Results show that the proposed method significantly enhances safety in human–machine shared control driving.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125003430\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125003430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人机共享控制通过防撞辅助技术对提高驾驶安全起着至关重要的作用。现有的协同控制器通常将风险评估和控制计算集成在一个模型预测控制(MPC)框架中,这在整合必要的非线性车辆动力学以进行准确的轨迹评估时可能会导致计算挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种新的安全共享控制方案,该方案包含两个关键组件:首先,一个轨迹生成器生成多个光滑的、无碰撞的候选轨迹,同时考虑了避障和车辆稳定性约束。其次,分层MPC模块通过双层结构评估和执行这些轨迹。上层采用线性模型计算控制输入,然后利用非线性车辆动力学模型对其进行评估,进行风险评估;下层采用简化的线性模型,通过跟踪选定的最优轨迹,计算实际控制命令。这种轨迹生成、风险评估和控制计算的分离极大地提高了计算效率和安全保证。在驾驶模拟器上进行了一系列的避碰实验,对该方法进行了验证。结果表明,该方法显著提高了人机共享控制驾驶的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hierarchical MPC-based safe shared control for forward collision avoidance in collaborative driving
Human–machine shared control plays a vital role in enhancing driving safety through collision avoidance assistance. Existing collaborative controllers typically integrate risk assessment and control computation within one Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework, which can lead to computational challenges when incorporating essential nonlinear vehicle dynamics for accurate trajectory evaluation. To address this issue, we propose a novel safe shared control scheme with two key components: First, a trajectory generator produces multiple smooth, collision-free candidate trajectories considering both obstacle avoidance and vehicle stability constraints. Second, a hierarchical MPC module evaluates and executes these trajectories through a dual-layer structure. The upper layer uses a linear model to compute control inputs and then evaluates them with a nonlinear vehicle dynamics model for risk assessment, while the lower layer calculates the actual control commands based on a simplified linear model by tracking the selected optimal trajectory. This separation of trajectory generation, risk evaluation, and control computation significantly enhances both computational efficiency and safety assurance. A series of collision avoidance experiments was conducted on a driving simulator to evaluate the proposed method. Results show that the proposed method significantly enhances safety in human–machine shared control driving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信